Literature DB >> 21585507

Relationships between language structure and language learning: the suffixing preference and grammatical categorization.

Michelle C St Clair1, Padraic Monaghan, Michael Ramscar.   

Abstract

It is a reasonable assumption that universal properties of natural languages are not accidental. They occur either because they are underwritten by genetic code, because they assist in language processing or language learning, or due to some combination of the two. In this paper we investigate one such language universal: the suffixing preference across the world's languages, whereby inflections tend to be added to the end of words. A corpus analysis of child-directed speech in English found that suffixes were more accurate at cuing the grammatical category of the root word than were prefixes. An artificial language experiment found that there was a learning advantage for suffixes over prefixes in terms of grammatical categorization within an artificial language. The results are consistent with an account of language universals that originate in general purpose learning mechanisms.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21585507     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  21 in total

1.  Testing the limits of long-distance learning: learning beyond a three-segment window.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-02-03

2.  Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking.

Authors:  Maryia Fedzechkina; Elissa L Newport; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  How arbitrary is language?

Authors:  Padraic Monaghan; Richard C Shillcock; Morten H Christiansen; Simon Kirby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Culture shapes the evolution of cognition.

Authors:  Bill Thompson; Simon Kirby; Kenny Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How Linearity and Structural Complexity Interact and Affect the Recognition of Italian Derived Words.

Authors:  Franca Ferrari Bridgers; Natalie Kacinik
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

6.  Tuning in to non-adjacencies: Exposure to learnable patterns supports discovering otherwise difficult structures.

Authors:  Martin Zettersten; Christine E Potter; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-07-02

7.  Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair "morpheme" learning.

Authors:  Amy S Finn; Carla L Hudson Kam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals.

Authors:  Jennifer Culbertson; Elissa L Newport
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-22

9.  Tracking Multiple Statistics: Simultaneous Learning of Object Names and Categories in English and Mandarin Speakers.

Authors:  Chi-Hsin Chen; Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe; Chih-Yi Wu; Hintat Cheung; Chen Yu
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-26

10.  Highlighting: a mechanism relevant for word learning.

Authors:  Hanako Yoshida; Joseph Michael Burling
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.