Literature DB >> 22300574

Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its relationship to tumor and nodal stage.

Minh Tam Truong1, Paul B Romesser, Muhammad M Qureshi, Nataliya Kovalchuk, Lawrence Orlina, John Willins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine tumor factors contributing to brachial plexus (BP) dose in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when the BP is routinely contoured as an organ at risk (OAR) for IMRT optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2004 to 2011, a total of 114 HNC patients underwent IMRT to a total dose of 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions, with the right and left BP prospectively contoured as separate OARs in 111 patients and the ipsilateral BP contoured in 3 patients (total, 225 BP). Staging category T4 and N2/3 disease were present in 34 (29.8%) and 74 (64.9%) patients, respectively. During IMRT optimization, the intent was to keep the maximum BP dose to ≤60 Gy, but prioritizing tumor coverage over achieving the BP constraints. BP dose parameters were compared with tumor and nodal stage.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 16.2 months, 43 (37.7%) patients had ≥24 months of follow-up with no brachial plexopathy reported. Mean BP volume was 8.2 ± 4.5 cm(3). Mean BP maximum dose was 58.1 ± 12.2 Gy, and BP mean dose was 42.2 ± 11.3 Gy. The BP maximum dose was ≤60, ≤66, and ≤70 Gy in 122 (54.2%), 185 (82.2%), and 203 (90.2%) BP, respectively. For oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx sites, the mean BP maximum dose was 58.4 Gy and 63.4 Gy in T0-3 and T4 disease, respectively (p = 0.002). Mean BP maximum dose with N0/1 and N2/3 disease was 52.8 Gy and 60.9 Gy, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In head-and-neck IMRT, dose constraints for the BP are difficult to achieve to ≤60 to 66 Gy with T4 disease of the larynx, hypopharynx, and oropharynx or N2/3 disease. The risk of brachial plexopathy is likely very small in HNC patients undergoing IMRT, although longer follow-up is required.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22300574      PMCID: PMC5014352          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy: review. Complication without a cure.

Authors:  Clark Schierle; Jonathan M Winograd
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.873

2.  Radiation-induced brachial plexus injury: follow-up of two different fractionation schedules.

Authors:  S Powell; J Cooke; C Parsons
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation.

Authors:  B Emami; J Lyman; A Brown; L Coia; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; B Shank; L J Solin; M Wesson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy: MR and clinical findings.

Authors:  B C Bowen; A Verma; A H Brandon; J A Fiedler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Development and validation of a standardized method for contouring the brachial plexus: preliminary dosimetric analysis among patients treated with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  William H Hall; Michael Guiou; Nancy Y Lee; Arthur Dublin; Samir Narayan; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; James A Purdy; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Validating the RTOG-endorsed brachial plexus contouring atlas: an evaluation of reproducibility among patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Sun K Yi; William H Hall; Mathew Mathai; Arthur B Dublin; Vishal Gupta; James A Purdy; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy increases dose to the brachial plexus compared with conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A M Chen; W H Hall; B-Q Li; M Guiou; C Wright; M Mathai; A Dublin; J A Purdy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Brachial plexus contouring with CT and MR imaging in radiation therapy planning for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Minh Tam Truong; Rohini N Nadgir; Ariel E Hirsch; Rathan M Subramaniam; Jimmy W Wang; Rebecca Wu; Melin Khandekar; A Omer Nawaz; Osamu Sakai
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  New developments in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypoxia targeting.

Authors:  Nancy Y Lee; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.929

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Volumetric tumor burden and its effect on brachial plexus dosimetry in head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Minh Tam Truong
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  Cervical nodal level V can safely be omitted in the treatment of locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with definitive IMRT.

Authors:  Stanley Gutiontov; Jonathan Leeman; Benjamin Lok; Paul Romesser; Nadeem Riaz; C Jillian Tsai; Nancy Lee; Sean McBride
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  A dosimetric evaluation on applying RTOG-based and CT/MRI-based delineation methods to brachial plexus in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Chi-Him Li; Vincent Wc Wu; George Chiu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tarita O Thomas; Tamer Refaat; Mehee Choi; Ian Bacchus; Sean Sachdev; Alfred W Rademaker; Vythialingam Sathiaseelan; Achilles Karagianis; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Constraining the brachial plexus does not compromise regional control in oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert W Mutter; Benjamin H Lok; Pinaki R Dutta; Nadeem Riaz; Jeremy Setton; Sean L Berry; Anuj Goenka; Zhigang Zhang; Shyam S Rao; Suzanne L Wolden; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  The radiation dose tolerance of the brachial plexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Yan; Weidong Kong; Andrew Kerr; Michael Brundage
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14

7.  Dosimetric benefits of placing dose constraints on the brachial plexus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hailan Jiang; Heming Lu; Hong Yuan; Huixian Huang; Yinglin Wei; Yanxian Zhang; Xu Liu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Early transient radiation-induced brachial plexopathy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Evrim Metcalfe; Durmus Etiz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-03-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.