Literature DB >> 18448267

Development and validation of a standardized method for contouring the brachial plexus: preliminary dosimetric analysis among patients treated with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

William H Hall1, Michael Guiou, Nancy Y Lee, Arthur Dublin, Samir Narayan, Srinivasan Vijayakumar, James A Purdy, Allen M Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols have proposed a limiting dose to the brachial plexus for patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer, essentially no recommendations exist for the delineation of this structure for treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using anatomic texts, radiologic data, and magnetic resonance imaging, a standardized method for delineating the brachial plexus on 3-mm axial computed tomography images was devised. A neuroradiologist assisted with identification of the brachial plexus and adjacent structures. This organ at risk was then contoured on 10 consecutive patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Dose-volume histogram curves were generated by applying the proposed brachial plexus contour to the initial treatment plan.
RESULTS: The total dose to the planning target volume ranged from 60 to 70 Gy (median, 70). The mean brachial plexus volume was 33 +/- 4 cm(3) (range, 25.1-39.4). The mean irradiated volumes of the brachial plexus were 50 Gy (17 +/- 3 cm(3)), 60 Gy (6 +/- 3 cm(3)), 66 Gy (2 +/- 1 cm(3)), 70 Gy (0 +/- 1 cm(3)). The maximal dose to the brachial plexus was 69.9 Gy (range, 62.3-76.9) and was >/=60 Gy, >/=66 Gy, and >/=70 Gy in 100%, 70%, and 30% of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique provides a precise and accurate method for delineating the brachial plexus organ at risk on treatment planning computed tomography scans. Our dosimetric analysis suggest that for patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer, brachial plexus routinely receives doses in excess of historic and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448267     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  32 in total

1.  Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its relationship to tumor and nodal stage.

Authors:  Minh Tam Truong; Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Lawrence Orlina; John Willins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Dose constraints to prevent radiation-induced brachial plexopathy in patients treated for lung cancer.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Jinzhong Yang; Ryan Williamson; Michelle L McBurney; Jeremy Erasmus; Pamela K Allen; Mandar Karhade; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Daniel Gomez; James Cox; Lei Dong; James Welsh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Organ-sparing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  XiaoShen Wang; ChaoSu Hu; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An increased risk of an excessive dose to the brachial plexus adjacent to gross nodal disease.

Authors:  Guosheng Feng; Heming Lu; Yuan Liang; Huasheng Chen; Liuyang Shu; Shui Lu; Jianfang Zhu; Weiwei Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Reliability and accuracy assessment of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed guidelines for brachial plexus contouring.

Authors:  Joris Van de Velde; Tom Vercauteren; Werner De Gersem; Johan Wouters; Katrien Vandecasteele; Philippe Vuye; Frank Vanpachtenbeke; Katharina D'Herde; Ingrid Kerckaert; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Comparison of CT-volumed supraclavicular fossa radiotherapy planning and conventional simulator-planned defined by bony landmarks for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Murray Brunt; Susan Lupton; Karen Thorley; Lynda Pearce; Julia Handley
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-28

7.  Brachial plexopathy after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nele Platteaux; Piet Dirix; Robert Hermans; Sandra Nuyts
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Volumetric tumor burden and its effect on brachial plexus dosimetry in head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Minh Tam Truong
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.482

9.  Delineating brachial plexus, cochlea, pharyngeal constrictor muscles and optic chiasm in head and neck radiotherapy: a CT-based model atlas.

Authors:  Domenico Genovesi; Francesca Perrotti; Marianna Trignani; Angelo Di Pilla; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Antonietta Augurio; Monica Di Tommaso; Massimo Caulo; Massimo Savastano; Armando Tartaro; Antonio Raffaele Cotroneo; Giampiero Ausili Cèfaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases.

Authors:  Xingyu Wu; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Dewey Odhner; Gargi V Pednekar; Charles B Simone; David McLaughlin; Chavanon Apinorasethkul; Ontida Apinorasethkul; John Lukens; Dimitris Mihailidis; Geraldine Shammo; Paul James; Akhil Tiwari; Lisa Wojtowicz; Joseph Camaratta; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.