Literature DB >> 21536393

Validating the RTOG-endorsed brachial plexus contouring atlas: an evaluation of reproducibility among patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.

Sun K Yi1, William H Hall, Mathew Mathai, Arthur B Dublin, Vishal Gupta, James A Purdy, Allen M Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate interobserver variability for contouring the brachial plexus as an organ-at-risk (OAR) and to analyze its potential dosimetric consequences in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-endorsed brachial plexus contouring atlas, three radiation oncologists independently delineated the OAR on treatment planning computed-tomography (CT) axial scans from 5 representative patients undergoing IMRT to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy for head-and-neck cancer. Dose-volume histograms for the brachial plexus were calculated, and interobserver differences were quantified by comparing various dosimetric statistics. Qualitative analysis was performed by visually assessing the overlapping contours on a single beam's eye view.
RESULTS: Brachial plexus volumes for the 5 patients across observers were 26 cc (18-35 cc), 25 cc (21-30 cc), 29 cc (28-32 cc), 29 cc (23-38 cc), and 29 cc (23-34 cc). On qualitative analysis, minimal variability existed except at the inferolateral portion of the OAR, where slight discrepancies were noted among the physicians. Maximum doses to the brachial plexus ranged from 71.6 to 72.6 Gy, 75.2 to 75.8 Gy, 69.1 to 71.0 Gy, 76.4 to 76.9 Gy, and 70.6 to 71.4 Gy. Respective volumes receiving doses greater than 60 Gy (V60) were 8.6 to 10.9 cc, 6.2 to 8.1 cc, 8.2 to 11.6 cc, 8.3 to 10.5 cc, and 5.6 to 9.8 cc.
CONCLUSION: The RTOG-endorsed brachial plexus atlas provides a consistent set of guidelines for contouring this OAR with essentially no learning curve. Adoption of these contouring guidelines in the clinical setting is encouraged.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536393     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

1.  Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its relationship to tumor and nodal stage.

Authors:  Minh Tam Truong; Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Lawrence Orlina; John Willins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An increased risk of an excessive dose to the brachial plexus adjacent to gross nodal disease.

Authors:  Guosheng Feng; Heming Lu; Yuan Liang; Huasheng Chen; Liuyang Shu; Shui Lu; Jianfang Zhu; Weiwei Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Reliability and accuracy assessment of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed guidelines for brachial plexus contouring.

Authors:  Joris Van de Velde; Tom Vercauteren; Werner De Gersem; Johan Wouters; Katrien Vandecasteele; Philippe Vuye; Frank Vanpachtenbeke; Katharina D'Herde; Ingrid Kerckaert; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Volumetric tumor burden and its effect on brachial plexus dosimetry in head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Muhammad M Qureshi; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Minh Tam Truong
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  Delineating brachial plexus, cochlea, pharyngeal constrictor muscles and optic chiasm in head and neck radiotherapy: a CT-based model atlas.

Authors:  Domenico Genovesi; Francesca Perrotti; Marianna Trignani; Angelo Di Pilla; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Antonietta Augurio; Monica Di Tommaso; Massimo Caulo; Massimo Savastano; Armando Tartaro; Antonio Raffaele Cotroneo; Giampiero Ausili Cèfaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Automatic contouring of brachial plexus using a multi-atlas approach for lung cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jinzhong Yang; Arya Amini; Ryan Williamson; Lifei Zhang; Yongbin Zhang; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; James Cox; James Welsh; Laurence Court; Lei Dong
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  A dosimetric evaluation on applying RTOG-based and CT/MRI-based delineation methods to brachial plexus in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Chi-Him Li; Vincent Wc Wu; George Chiu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk.

Authors:  Charlotte L Brouwer; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Edwin van den Heuvel; Joop C Duppen; Arash Navran; Henk P Bijl; Olga Chouvalova; Fred R Burlage; Harm Meertens; Johannes A Langendijk; Aart A van 't Veld
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tarita O Thomas; Tamer Refaat; Mehee Choi; Ian Bacchus; Sean Sachdev; Alfred W Rademaker; Vythialingam Sathiaseelan; Achilles Karagianis; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Early transient radiation-induced brachial plexopathy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Evrim Metcalfe; Durmus Etiz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.