Literature DB >> 24474895

Slight changes in the mechanical stimulation affects osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells in co-culture.

Anke Kadow-Romacker1, Georg N Duda1, Nicole Bormann1, Gerhard Schmidmaier2, Britt Wildemann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells are responsible for coordinated bone maintenance, illustrated by a balanced formation and resorption. Both parameters appear to be influenced by mechanical constrains acting on each of these cell types individually. We hypothesized that the interactions between both cell types are also influenced by mechanical stimulation.
METHODS: Co-cultures of osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells were stimulated with 1,100 µstrain, 0.1 or 0.3 Hz for 1-5 min/day over 5 days. Two different setups depending on the differentiation of the osteoclast-like cells were used: i) differentiation assay for the fusion of pre-osteoclasts to osteoclasts, ii) resorption assay to determine the activity level of osteoclast-like cells.
RESULTS: In the differentiation assay (co-culture of osteoblasts with unfused osteoclast precursor cells) the mechanical stimulation resulted in a significant decrease of collagen-1 and osteocalcin produced by osteoblast-like cells. Significantly more TRAP-iso5b was measured after stimulation for 3 min with 0.1 Hz, indicating enhanced osteoclastogenesis. In the resorption assay (co-culture of osteoblasts with fused osteoclasts) the stimulation for 3 min with 0.3 Hz significantly increased the resorption activity of osteoclasts measured by the pit formation and the collagen resorption. The same mechanical stimulation resulted in an increased collagen-1 production by the osteoblast-like cells. The ratio of RANKL/OPG was not different between the groups.
CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that already small changes in duration or frequency of mechanical stimulation had significant consequences for the behavior of osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells in co-culture, which partially depend on the differentiation status of the osteoclast-like cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-culture; Differentiation; Mechanical stimulation; Osteoblast-like cells; Osteoclast-like cells

Year:  2013        PMID: 24474895      PMCID: PMC3901596          DOI: 10.1159/000356284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother        ISSN: 1660-3796            Impact factor:   3.747


  31 in total

1.  Mechanical strain effect on bone-resorbing activity and messenger RNA expressions of marker enzymes in isolated osteoclast culture.

Authors:  K Kurata; T Uemura; A Nemoto; T Tateishi; T Murakami; H Higaki; H Miura; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Lidan You; Sara Temiyasathit; Peling Lee; Chi Hyun Kim; Padmaja Tummala; Wei Yao; Wade Kingery; Amanda M Malone; Ronald Y Kwon; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Osteocytes subjected to fluid flow inhibit osteoclast formation and bone resorption.

Authors:  S Djien Tan; Teun J de Vries; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Cornelis M Semeins; Vincent Everts; Jenneke Klein-Nulend
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Development of an osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture derived by human bone marrow stromal cells and human monocytes for biomaterials testing.

Authors:  C Heinemann; S Heinemann; H Worch; T Hanke
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  Regulation of synthesis of osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand in normal human osteoblasts via the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by the application of cyclic tensile strain.

Authors:  Akinori Kusumi; Hirotaka Sakaki; Tomomi Kusumi; Mitsuo Oda; Kenji Narita; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Kohsei Kubota; Hisashi Satoh; Hiroto Kimura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Mechanical stimulation effects on functional end effectors in osteoblastic MG-63 cells.

Authors:  M M Saunders; A F Taylor; C Du; Z Zhou; V D Pellegrini; H J Donahue
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Characterization of osteoclasts derived from CD14+ monocytes isolated from peripheral blood.

Authors:  Mette Grøndahl Sørensen; Kim Henriksen; Sophie Schaller; Dennis Bang Henriksen; Finn Cilius Nielsen; Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel; Morten Asser Karsdal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss.

Authors:  J Ignacio Aguirre; Lilian I Plotkin; Scott A Stewart; Robert S Weinstein; A Michael Parfitt; Stavros C Manolagas; Teresita Bellido
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Oscillatory fluid flow-induced shear stress decreases osteoclastogenesis through RANKL and OPG signaling.

Authors:  Chi Hyun Kim; Lidan You; Clare E Yellowley; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Heparin enhances osteoclastic bone resorption by inhibiting osteoprotegerin activity.

Authors:  Atsushi Irie; Masamichi Takami; Hideo Kubo; Naoko Sekino-Suzuki; Kohji Kasahara; Yutaka Sanai
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  5 in total

1.  Advanced therapy medicinal products - a multiple challenge.

Authors:  Axel Pruss; Henk Garritsen
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Effect of temporal onsets of mechanical loading on bone formation inside a tissue engineering scaffold combined with cell therapy.

Authors:  T C Hausherr; K Nuss; E Thein; S Krähenbühl; L A Applegate; D P Pioletti
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: A systematic review and map of available literature.

Authors:  Stefan J A Remmers; Bregje W M de Wildt; Michelle A M Vis; Eva S R Spaander; Rob B M de Vries; Keita Ito; Sandra Hofmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  From the Clinical Problem to the Basic Research-Co-Culture Models of Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Sheng Zhu; Sabrina Ehnert; Marc Rouß; Victor Häussling; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Tao Chen; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The Interaction of BMP2-Induced Defect Healing in Rat and Fixator Stiffness Modulates Matrix Alignment and Contraction.

Authors:  Carolin Schwarz; Claus-Eric Ott; Dag Wulsten; Erik Brauer; Sophie Schreivogel; Ansgar Petersen; Kerstin Hassanein; Linda Roewer; Tanja Schmidt; Bettina M Willie; Georg N Duda
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-04-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.