Literature DB >> 22297180

Using low tube voltage (80kVp) quadruple phase liver CT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: two-year experience and comparison with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced liver MRI.

Chang Hee Lee1, Kyeong Ah Kim, Jongmee Lee, Yang Shin Park, Jae Woong Choi, Cheol Min Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the diagnostic performance of quadruple phase low tube voltage liver CT through the comparison with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced liver MRI for the detection of HCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-obese patients (38 men, eight women) with 68 HCCs underwent quadruple-phase CT at 16 MDCT (using low tube voltage, 80kVp; moderately high tube current, 280mAs) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3T MRI. Three observers independently and randomly reviewed the CT and MR images on a tumor-by-tumor basis. The diagnostic accuracy of these techniques for detecting HCC was assessed using alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were evaluated. The mean effective doses for the low dose CT were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The areas under the ROC curves were 0.963, 0.959, and 0.941 for low dose CT and 0.981, 0.982, and 0.976 for MRI. Differences in Az of the two techniques for each observer were not statistically significant (P>.05). Differences in sensitivity and positive predictive values between the two techniques for each observer were not also statistically significant: sensitivity (86.8%, 82.4%, 85.3% for CT and 95.6%, 94.1%, 91.2% for MRI) and positive predictive values (92.2%, 90.3%, 89.2% for CT and 92.9%, 92.8%, 92.5% for MRI). Six HCCs (8.8%) in five patients were observed only on hepatobiliary phase of MRI, and all were smaller than 1.5cm. The mean effective dose for CT was approximately 10.2mSv.
CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple-phase low-dose liver CT (80kVp, 280mAs) had relatively good diagnostic performance for detecting HCC in non-obese patients. Because no significant difference was observed between low-dose CT and MRI, the use of low-dose liver CT can be justified based on its reduced radiation effects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22297180     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimal Modalities for HCC Surveillance in a High-Incidence Region.

Authors:  Young Chang; Jeong-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-01-13

2.  Value of liver computed tomography with iodixanol 270, 80 kVp and iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Diomidis Botsikas; Isabelle Barnaure; Sylvain Terraz; Christoph D Becker; Anastasia Kalovidouri; Xavier Montet
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 3.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Vanja Giljaca; Agostino Colli; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Damir Miletic; Davor Štimac
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

4.  Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic-acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MR imaging at 3T: comparing high and low flip angle.

Authors:  Mina Song; Hyeon Je Cho; Yun Ku Cho; Mi Young Kim; Sang Ik Noh; Soo Hyun Yang
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Diagnostic performance and image quality of low-tube voltage and low-contrast medium dose protocol with hybrid iterative reconstruction for hepatic dynamic CT.

Authors:  Shintaro Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Tatsuya Shimizu; Marie Luise Kromrey; Yoshihito Aikawa; Daiki Tamada; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Is 3-Tesla Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging superior to 64-slice contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Bettina Maiwald; Donald Lobsien; Thomas Kahn; Patrick Stumpp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quantitative washout in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing TACE: an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis?

Authors:  Lukas Müller; Felix Hahn; Florian Jungmann; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Fabian Stoehr; Moritz C Halfmann; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jan Hinrichs; Timo A Auer; Christoph Düber; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Reduction of the radiation dose and the amount of contrast material in hepatic dynamic CT using low tube voltage and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional.

Authors:  Atsushi Nakamoto; Kiyohito Yamamoto; Makoto Sakane; Go Nakai; Akira Higashiyama; Hiroshi Juri; Shushi Yoshikawa; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Jun Liu; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.