Literature DB >> 2229673

Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users.

C J Brown1, P J Abbas, B Gantz.   

Abstract

This study describes a method for recording the electrically evoked, whole-nerve action potential (EAP) in users of the Ineraid cochlear implant. The method is an adaptation of one originally used by Charlet de Sauvage et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 615-627 (1983)] in guinea pigs. The response, recorded from 11 subjects, consists of a single negative peak that occurs with a latency of approximately 0.4 ms. EAP input/output functions are steeply sloping and monotonic. Response amplitudes ranging up to 160 micro V have been recorded. Slope of the EAP input/output function correlates modestly (approximately 0.6-0.69) with results of tests measuring word recognition skills. The refractory properties of the auditory nerve were also assessed. Differences across subjects were found in the rate of recovery from the refractory state. These findings imply that there may be difference across subjects in the accuracy with which rapid temporal cues can be coded at the level of the auditory nerve. Reasonably strong correlations (approximately 0.74-0.85) have been found between the magnitude of the slope of these recovery curves and performance on tests of word recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229673     DOI: 10.1121/1.399716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  [Refractory behaviour of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve].

Authors:  A Morsnowski; B Charasse; L Collet; M Killian; J Müller-Deile
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Carolyn J Brown; Christine P Etler; Sara O'Brien; Li-Kuei Chiou; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Tara Vongpaisal; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd; Andrew J King; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.