Literature DB >> 22296676

Optimized nLC-MS workflow for laser capture microdissected breast cancer tissue.

René B H Braakman1, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst, Ning Qing Liu, Christoph Stingl, Lennard J M Dekker, Theo M Luider, John W M Martens, John A Foekens, Arzu Umar.   

Abstract

Reliable sample preparation is of utmost importance for comparative proteome analysis, particularly when investigating minute amounts of clinical specimens, such as laser capture microdissected tumor tissue. In this study, we present an optimized nanoLC-MS workflow specifically for the analysis of laser capture microdissected breast cancer tissue. Analytical performance of different laser capture microdissection (LCM) functions available on the PALM system, time dependent trypsin digestion efficiency, effect of sample preparation and digestion time on peptide modification, semi-tryptic peptides and missed cleavages were evaluated. Our results show that microdissection from uncoated glass slides results in protein degradation; that protease and phosphatase inhibitors do not result in detectable improvement in number of peptides or semi-tryptic peptides; and that digestion time longer than four hours drastically reduces the number of missed cleavages, but also increases the number of unexpectedly modified peptides. Overalkylation was the most dominant side-reaction, which significantly increased overnight (P=0.05). The latter effect could almost completely be reverted by the use of a quenching agent (P=0.001). Taken together, our results show that it is of importance to carefully control sample handling steps so that reliable protein identification and quantitation can be performed within comparative proteomics studies using LCM. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Proteomics: The clinical link.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22296676     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  16 in total

Review 1.  Approaches for targeted proteomics and its potential applications in neuroscience.

Authors:  Sumit Sethi; Dipti Chourasia; Ishwar S Parhar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Microdissected pancreatic cancer proteomes reveal tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Tessa Ys Le Large; Giulia Mantini; Laura L Meijer; Thang V Pham; Niccola Funel; Nicole Ct van Grieken; Bart Kok; Jaco Knol; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven; Sander R Piersma; Connie R Jimenez; G Kazemier; Elisa Giovannetti; Maarten F Bijlsma
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  SNaPP: Simplified Nanoproteomics Platform for Reproducible Global Proteomic Analysis of Nanogram Protein Quantities.

Authors:  Eric L Huang; Paul D Piehowski; Daniel J Orton; Ronald J Moore; Wei-Jun Qian; Cameron P Casey; Xiaofei Sun; Sudhansu K Dey; Kristin E Burnum-Johnson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Elucidating the Molecular Composition of Cartilage by Proteomics.

Authors:  Ming-Feng Hsueh; Areej Khabut; Sven Kjellström; Patrik Önnerfjord; Virginia Byers Kraus
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Proteomic Profiling in the Brain of CLN1 Disease Model Reveals Affected Functional Modules.

Authors:  Saara Tikka; Evanthia Monogioudi; Athanasios Gotsopoulos; Rabah Soliymani; Francesco Pezzini; Enzo Scifo; Kristiina Uusi-Rauva; Jaana Tyynelä; Marc Baumann; Anu Jalanko; Alessandro Simonati; Maciej Lalowski
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Workflow for combined proteomics and glycomics profiling from histological tissues.

Authors:  Lilla Turiák; Chun Shao; Le Meng; Kshitij Khatri; Nancy Leymarie; Qi Wang; Harry Pantazopoulos; Deborah R Leon; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Technologies for systems-level analysis of specific cell types in plants.

Authors:  Dongxue Wang; E Shannon Mills; Roger B Deal
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.729

8.  Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Mass Limited Tissue Samples for Spatially Resolved Tissue Profiling.

Authors:  Paul D Piehowski; Rui Zhao; Ronald J Moore; Geremy Clair; Charles Ansong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

Review 9.  Advances in microscale separations towards nanoproteomics applications.

Authors:  Lian Yi; Paul D Piehowski; Tujin Shi; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Global proteomic characterization of microdissected estrogen receptor positive breast tumors.

Authors:  Tommaso De Marchi; Ning Qing Liu; Christoph Sting; Marcel Smid; Mila Tjoa; René B H Braakman; Theo M Luider; John A Foekens; John W M Martens; Arzu Umar
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.