Achieving a cure for HIV infection: do we have reasons to be optimistic?

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996 has transformed a lethal disease to a chronic pathology with a dramatic decrease in mortality and morbidity of AIDS-related symptoms in infected patients. However, HAART has not allowed the cure of HIV infection, the main obstacle to HIV eradication being the existence of quiescent reservoirs. Several other problems have been encountered with HAART (such as side effects, adherence to medication, emergence of resistance and cost of treatment), and these motivate the search for new ways to treat these patients. Recent advances hold promise for the ultimate cure of HIV infection, which is the topic of this review. Besides these new strategies aiming to eliminate the virus, efforts must be made to improve current HAART. We believe that the cure of HIV infection will not be attained in the short term and that a strategy based on purging the reservoirs has to be associated with an aggressive HAART strategy.

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), identified 28 years ago,[1] remains a global health threat responsible for a worldwide pandemic with an estimated 33 million people infected.[2] More than 7000 new HIV infections occur each day, and the number of newly diagnosed infections remains far greater than the number of people (around 50%) who have access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Advances have been made in treating AIDS since the introduction of HAART in 1996. This has transformed a lethal disease into a chronic pathology, with a dramatic decrease of mortality and morbidity of AIDS-related symptoms in infected patients.[3,4]

Why is achieving a cure important?

To date, the only way to treat patients infected with HIV relies on a combination of drugs that acts at different stages of the viral life cycle, preventing the virus from replicating. These molecules target four stages of the cycle: viral entry, reverse transcription of the viral genome, integration into the genome of the host cell and maturation of viral proteins. This therapy can reduce plasma virus levels below detection limits (≤50 copies/mL). However, with very sensitive but expensive and technically challenging methods, a residual viraemia is still detected in patients on HAART.[5-8] Moreover, HIV RNA typically returns to a measurable plasma level in less than 2 weeks when HAART is interrupted, suggesting that even long-term suppression of HIV-1 replication by HAART fails to totally eliminate HIV-1. These two latter phenomena are mainly due to the existence of HIV reservoirs.[6,9-13] The existence of integrated latent viruses or virus replicating at a very low level in different cellular reservoirs is an obstacle to the eradication of the virus, and thus the total recovery of patients, and requires strict adherence to lifelong treatment.[14-21] In addition, these cellular reservoirs are often found in tissue sanctuaries, such as the brain, where drug penetration may be several orders of magnitude lower than in other tissues.[16,18] Viral clearance from other reservoirs, such as from chronically infected macrophages, is also difficult since reverse transcriptase inhibitors are usually ineffective and protease inhibitors have significantly lower activities in these cells than in lymphocytes.[22,23] Moreover, emergence of many side effects may require the cessation of treatment.[24] Furthermore, the development of many types of resistance, related to the extreme mutability of the virus and in part to treatment interruptions, has been described in the literature.[25-28] Another major concern is related to non-AIDS events and non-AIDS mortality in patients having a residual viraemia and a normal CD4+ count, a situation also described in some HIV non-progressors. Owing to the residual viraemia, patients develop chronic inflammation that leads to several complications, for instance, cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, faster evolution of viral hepatitis and cancer.[29-33]

Last but not least, a major problem related to HAART is the cost of the treatment. Even the cost associated with the cheaper generic forms of the drugs far exceeds the abilities of many resource-limited countries in providing treatment. The cost of this treatment will be increasingly important in the future, with an overall global budget requirement to address this problem from today to 2031 being estimated at US$397–727 billion.[34] Since, to date, no effective HIV-1 vaccine is available,[35-38] it appears crucial to improve HAART and to develop new strategies to cure HIV.[39,40]

Which cure is needed: a functional or a sterilizing cure?

A sterilizing cure requires the total eradication of all HIV-infected cells, including quiescent reservoirs. On the other hand, a functional cure aims to mimic a situation encountered in some special patients called ‘elite controllers’ who are able to control viral replication and have less than 50 copies/mL of the virus without any treatment. Although a sterilizing cure would be the most appropriate and desirable, it may be difficult or impossible to really achieve. Only one reported case, the German case, is known in the literature that suggests a possible eradication of the virus.[41] A functional cure appears more feasible since it seems impossible to get rid of HIV from latent cells and from sanctuaries. We have to keep in mind however that the chronic inflammation described in patients under HAART has also been described in some elite controllers who have presented with residual viraemia and higher immune activation compared with healthy patients.[42-44] It is very likely that these patients will develop more non-AIDS events compared with those who are uninfected or actually cured.

How might we achieve a cure?

The best scenario would be to eradicate the virus from all infected cells. Even though this appears very difficult, we should be able to drastically decrease the HIV reservoirs by identifying and then eliminating them. Residual on-going viral replication, whatever its origin, also has to be reduced to preclude non-AIDS events.

In this article we will discuss new strategies under investigation that aim to eradicate HIV from infected patients. First we will discuss a recently described case that showed a possible eradication of HIV following transplantation of CCR5-deficient haematopoietic stem cells. This strategy may open new avenues to cure HIV-infected patients. We will also discuss novel strategies based on purging reservoirs followed by aggressive HAART. This approach has already been used in several clinical trials. Finally, we believe that HAART has to be improved and/or intensified; however, we have to keep in mind that HAART alone will not allow for a cure.

The critical role of CCR5 in maintaining HIV-1 infection

A proof of concept

A report of a German patient being transplanted with stem cells from a donor who carried the Δ32 CCR5 mutation and then controlled his HIV infection has highlighted the critical role of CCR5 in maintaining HIV infection.[45] It is well known that HIV-1 enters cells by using CD4 receptors and CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptors and persons homozygotic for a 32 bp deletion in the gene coding for CCR5 are resistant to HIV-1 infection.[46,47] It is noteworthy that the origin of the CCR5-Δ32-containing ancestral haplotype is recent (estimated range of 275–1875 years) and might be related to a historic strong selective event such as an epidemic of a pathogen that, like HIV-1, utilizes CCR5. This hypothetical epidemic has increased the frequency of this mutation in ancestral Caucasian populations.[48] Hutter understood the significance of the CCR5 mutation and suggested that transplantation of stem cells originating from a donor homozygotic for the mutation could effectively eradicate the virus. After the relapse of leukaemia in the German patient with HIV there was no other choice but to transplant allogeneic stem cells to this person. The patient, as suggested by Hutter, received Δ32 CCR5 mutant stem cells. Following the medical intervention, the patient has stopped HAART and HIV RNA has remained below 1 copy/mL for now over 4 years. In a recent paper this group showed evidence even for a possible cure of HIV-1 infection in this patient. Indeed, they demonstrated reconstitution of both circulating and mucosal CD4+ T cells that do not express CCR5 while the patient remained free of the virus. Moreover, they also found evidence that long-lived cells such as macrophages became Δ32 CCR5. Since these cells are reservoirs for the virus along with CD4+ T memory cells, it appears that the size of the viral reservoir has decreased. This result was unexpected since the patient's CD4+ memory cells are still susceptible to productive infection by lymphotropic (CXCR4-tropic) HIV. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has allowed the eradication of long-lived reservoirs, which has prevented HIV rebound during the process of immune reconstitution following stem cell transplantation. Although this specific case is a real success, stem cell transplantation as a general strategy to cure infected patients is not yet feasible due to the high mortality of this treatment (20%–30%). This report constitutes a proof of concept and opens the development of new strategies targeting the CCR5 coreceptor.

CCR5 gene therapy

Among new treatments, CCR5 gene therapy could be a potential treatment to cure HIV (Figure 1). In preclinical trials, HIV-1-infected mice engrafted with zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)-modified CD4+ T cells had lower viral loads and higher CD4+ T cell counts than mice engrafted with wild-type CD4+ T cells, consistent with the potential to reconstitute immune function in individuals with HIV/AIDS by the maintenance of an HIV-resistant CD4+ T cell population.[49,50] Preliminary results of two Phase 1 clinical trials using this attractive approach were presented at the 2011 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI).[51,52] Lalezari presented data on transformed CD4+ T cells. The wild-type CD4+ T cells were obtained from six patients who had been living with HIV infection for >20 years. Participants chosen had continued low CD4+ T cell counts (ranging from 200 to 500 cells/mm3), despite receiving antiretroviral therapy, which reduced HIV viral load to an undetectable level. Both studies showed a successful and tolerated engraftment of the transformed CD4+ T cells. At the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), data from another clinical trial was also presented in which six subjects having initially >450 CD4+ T cells/mm3 under HAART[53] were followed for 12 weeks after infusion of ex vivo transformed CD4+ T cells. Only one patient in this clinical trial became undetectable for the virus. However, this patient entered the clinical study with one Δ32 CCR5 mutation. Therefore a functional cure with this gene therapy was not attained. As explained during this conference, only 5% of the total CD4+ T cells were transformed, in contrast to the 100% in the German patient who benefited from stem cell transplantation. There is hope however that this small fraction of cells will rise in the body, since it is expected that the CCR5+ cells infected by HIV-1 will die over time. It is possible that CCR5− mutants will be selected and will replace the normal CCR5+ cells, since the release of virus from these CCR5+ cells will not be able to infect the transfused population of CCR5− mutants. A much longer follow-up is needed to confirm these expectations.

Figure 1.

Promising new approaches to cure patients of HIV-1: molecular mechanisms at the macrophage level. Beside increasing the pool of new molecules and improving the currently used ones in HAART, new approaches are required to reach a full recovery from HIV-1 infection. To date, HAART can only control and prevent viral replication, but fails to achieve total viral clearance. New potential strategies include virus eradication through gene therapy and clearance of the viral reservoirs. The first strategy derived from the observation of the Δ32 CCR5 bone marrow transplanted German patient, who seems to be free of HIV-1 infection. Owing to the high risk associated with surgery and the impossibility of using this method in a large number of patients, gene therapy could be a way to disrupt the CCR5-mediated infection in order to mimic the previous results of the German patient (1). The second strategy relies on associating the current HAART with molecules activating the viral transcription and/or targeting host proteins favouring HIV-1 latency. On the one hand, the early stage of viral replication requires the transcription activator NF-κB, thus cytokines such as TNF-α may allow the recovery of full viral transcription in latent reservoirs (2). On the other hand, chromatin-modifying enzymes have been associated with HIV-1 transcription extinction through fine modifications of the epigenetic code on the viral promoter. Limiting DNA methylation of the CpG islands (3), increasing activation marks, such as acetylation of histones from Nuc-1 (4), and/or avoiding marks associated with heterochromatin, such as simultaneous trimethylation of lysine 4 and lysine 9 (5,6) of histone H3 in Nuc-1 may revert the latently infected state back to productively infected macrophages. This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC.

The long-term control of HIV by the German patient who received a transplant of CCR5-deficient haematopoietic stem cells holds promise for a real cure,[54] but due to its toxicity, it is not a realistic one as claimed by Lewin and Rouzioux.[55] Further investigations in order to understand the mechanism by which HIV was eradicated have to be performed. It would also be interesting to repeat this approach in other patients, which will help us to make further conclusions.[56] It even raises questions such as why there is no HIV rebound from long-lived viral reservoirs producing CXCR4-tropic viruses or what the role is of the transplantation procedure itself[45,55] in the eradication of the virus. The debate, regarding whether the treatment of the German patient represents a sterilizing cure or not, is far from over.[57] Gene therapy (including CCR5 gene therapy) is indeed a very attractive approach to cure HIV-1 infection, but it is not for immediate use, even though considerable progress in gene delivery has been made.[58,59] Moreover, the debate as to whether or not this gene therapy will lead to a sterilizing cure is still open.[60]

Purging viral reservoirs

The main drawback of HAART is that it is unable to purge the virus from quiescent reservoirs, i.e. truly latent cells,[61-63] and/or from cells with cryptic on-going HIV replication,[7,64,65] or from sanctuaries such as the brain.[66-68] Resting memory CD4+ T cells are the major cellular and the best characterized reservoirs in the natural host.[6,7,69-71] The presence of latent proviral HIV-1 DNA in this cell population has definitely been proven.[69]

Other reservoirs than resting CD4+ T cells have also been proposed.[16,18-20] Genetic studies showed that during rebound viraemia (due to HAART interruption) the virus could be detected from reservoirs other than CD4+ T cells.[62,72,73] It has been proposed that peripheral blood monocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages in the lymph nodes and haematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow can be infected latently and therefore contribute to viral persistence.[14-17,19,61,74] It is still debated whether or not viral persistence in these latter reservoirs is due to true latency or to a low-level on-going replication.[75,76]

Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying HIV persistence is a prerequisite to devise novel treatments aiming to purge these reservoirs. Several recent reviews describe in more detail the mechanisms of HIV persistence with implications for the development of new therapeutic strategies.[18,20,40,77-79] Before using strategies that aim at purging the reservoir in combination with an intensified HAART, we need: (i) to identify and characterize the molecular actors involved in the persistence of latency, which relies on the chromatin environment; and (ii) to understand the mechanisms of reactivation in order to prevent it.

Persistence of latency

Once HIV-1 DNA has integrated into the host genome, and latency has been established, maintenance of HIV-1 latency depends on the chromatin environment. The chromatin organization of the HIV-1 promoter with precisely positioned nucleosomes[80,81] has been well described. Nuc-1, a nucleosome located immediately downstream of the transcription initiation site, impedes long terminal repeat (LTR) activity. Epigenetic modifications and disruption of Nuc-1 are a prerequisite of activation of LTR-driven transcription and viral expression.[82] It was recently found that recruitment of deacetylases and methylases on the LTR was associated with epigenetic modifications (deacetylation of H3K9 followed by H3K9 trimethylation and recruitment of HP1 proteins) in CD4+ T cells. In these experiments, the methylase Suv39H1 and the HP1γ proteins were knocked down by small interfering RNA (siRNA). The depletion of these factors increased the level of HIV-1 expression.[83]

Epigenetic modifications of the LTR have also been described in microglial cells, the CNS-resident macrophages. These cells are major targets for HIV-1 and constitute latently infected cellular reservoirs in the brain.[84] Previous work from our laboratory has shown that a COUP-TF interacting protein 2 (CTIP2), a recently cloned transcriptional repressor that can associate with members of the COUP-TF family,[85] inhibits HIV-1 replication in human microglial cells.[86,87] Subsequently we showed that CTIP2 inhibited HIV-1 gene transcription in these cells by recruiting a chromatin-modifying complex.[88] As demonstrated in T lymphocytes, our work suggests a concomitant recruitment of histone deacetylases HDAC1, HDAC2 and methylase SUV39H1 to the viral promoter by CTIP2. Ordered histone modifications would allow HP1 binding, heterochromatin formation and, as a consequence, HIV silencing. The heterochromatin formation at the HIV-1 promoter has been linked to post-integration latency, and this suggests that transcriptional repressors such as CTIP2 are involved in the establishment and maintenance of viral persistence and post-integration latency in the brain.

The corepressor CTIP2 has an even more pleiotropic action by regulating the expression of genes of infected cells. Recruited to the cellular cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CDKN1A/p21waf (p21) promoter, CTIP2 silences p21 gene transcription by inducing epigenetic modifications, as described above, for the HIV-1 promoter. This effect indirectly favours HIV-1 latency since activation of the p21 gene stimulates viral expression in macrophages.[89] Moreover, CTIP2 counteracts HIV-1 Vpr, which is required for p21 expression. We suggest that all these factors contribute together to HIV-1 transcriptional latency in microglial cells.[90] The picture regarding the importance of p21 in the replicative cycle of HIV-1 is far more complicated since p21 has been described as a restriction factor in macrophages and in resting CD4 T cells.[91,92] The protein p21 might have different effects on HIV-1 infection of macrophages depending on the targeted viral life cycle step, and therefore on the time since infection.[93]

We have also identified a new actor involved in the maintenance of HIV-1 latency in microglial cells, the lysine-specific demethylase (LSD1).[94] We notably showed that LSD1 repressed HIV-1 transcription and viral expression in a synergistic manner with CTIP2 and reported that recruitment of LSD1 at the HIV-1 proximal promoter is associated with both H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 epigenetic marks. Association of both H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 epigenetic marks with LSD1 recruitment may thus constitute a new level of eukaryotic gene regulation. These observations are consistent with the discovery that H3K4 methylation at certain chromatin loci may prevent gene expression.[95] Interestingly, such a gene repression linked to H3K4me3 has been proposed to prevent the expression of cryptic promoters.[95,96] This is strengthened by the finding that HIV-1 preferentially integrates into active genes and therefore could be considered as a cryptic gene.

Surprisingly, LSD1 has been associated with activation of HIV transcription in CD4+ T cells through demethylation of K51 Tat.[97] However, in microglial cells the mechanisms underlying LSD1-mediated increase of H3K4 trimethylation is different and might rely on the ability of LSD1 to anchor other factors at the promoter rather than its own enzymatic activity. Indeed, H3K4 trimethylation was associated with the recruitment of LSD1, hSET1 and WDR5 at the Sp1 binding sites of the HIV-1 LTR. Moreover, reactivation of HIV-1 proviruses correlated with the release of LSD1, hSET1 and WDR5 from the viral promoter and with a reduced H3K4 trimethylation. In contrast to CD4+ T cells, LSD1 is involved in the maintenance of HIV-1 latency in microglial cells by favouring a local heterochromatin structure. These two studies reporting a dual role of LSD1 through different mechanisms in two main HIV-1 targets point to the complexity of HIV latency and raise the question of how effective the use of inhibitors of LSD1 would be for full HIV-1 reactivation. Indeed, targeting LSD1 for full reactivation in microglial cells might not work in lymphocytes. Instead, in the latter cells an induction of HIV latency is expected.[98] Further investigation of the epigenetic regulation of HIV latency is therefore needed in order to design efficient drugs targeting viral reservoirs.

Another field of interest is DNA methylation, which has been involved in DNA silencing and latency.[99] It is now well established that DNA CpG methylation plays an important role in maintaining HIV-1 latency,[100,101] despite previous controversies.[102] Therefore DNA methylase inhibitors, such as 5-azacytidine, could be useful in strategies aiming to reactivate reservoirs. It is noteworthy that only a few percent of the latent viruses are methylated on their DNA, but these reservoirs of latent viruses are highly resistant to reactivation. Achieving a cure would probably require the treatment of many different types of latency simultaneously by a combination therapy approach.

Preventing reactivation

Several mechanisms acting at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level are at work in order to preclude HIV reactivation in latent reservoirs. Affecting these mechanisms may open new ways to purge reservoirs. Sequestration of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) in the cytoplasm of latent cells is one of these mechanisms.[103] T cell activation with tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) allows translocation to the nucleus of NF-κB, which then binds to the LTR and activates the early phase (Tat independent) virus transcription (Figure 1). Besides TNF-α, many other factors have been involved in HIV reactivation, including interleukins (IL) IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, interferon γ (IFN-γ) and CD154,[104-109] and could be used to purge the reservoirs. Among mechanisms acting at the post-transcriptional level, regulation of the exportation of viral RNAs by the poly track binding protein (PTB) seems to be important in memory CD4+ T cells.[110] Another important mechanism that acts at the post-transcriptional level involves microRNAs (miRNAs). These are single-stranded RNAs of 19–25 nucleotides involved in various biological processes in eukaryotic cells.[111,112] miRNAs interact with a complementary sequence in the 3′-untranscribed region (UTR) of target mRNAs by partial sequence matching, which leads either to mRNA degradation or, more often, to translational inhibition.[112] miRNAs are involved in the regulation of virus expression as well.[113] Recently it was shown that miRNAs regulate the expression of the histone acetyltransferase Tat cofactor PCAF and HIV replication.[114] In a recent paper, Huang et al. reported an enrichment of miRNAs in clusters, which has been observed only in resting CD4+ T cells and not in active CD4+ T cells.[115] They found that several of the miRNA clusters inhibited HIV replication, and suggested that miRNAs contribute to HIV latency in resting primary CD4+ T cells. They proposed to use specific antagomirs (anti-miRNA antisense) raised against these miRNA in order to reactivate latent CD4+ T cells.[116] However, as discussed by Sun and Rossi, the use of antagomirs to reactivate latently infected cells could be toxic for uninfected cells.[117] The feasibility of using miRNAs for HIV treatment is premature and will need far more investigation.

Implications for therapies based on purging reservoirs

Original strategies based on the combination of a purge of the reservoirs and intensifying HAART aim to eradicate the virus from infected patients. Understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in latency will allow us to devise new strategies that will facilitate the reactivation of all the reservoirs.

One strategy, known as ‘Immune Activation Therapy’, aims to activate T cells[118-121] (Figure 1). Many physiological stimuli that effectively activated T cells passed preclinical studies, but all failed in clinical studies.[122] IL-7 held promise since this cytokine is known to be essential for the maintenance of T cell homeostasis. Indeed, there are two subsets of memory T cells:[10] central memory T cells (Tcm), which are maintained through T cell survival and low-level driven proliferation and can persist for decades, and transitional memory T cells (Ttm), which persist, in contrast, by homeostatic proliferation of infected cells and could be reduced by using drugs preventing memory T cells from dividing. Interestingly, an IL-7-driven proliferation of Ttm cells can induce HIV expression from quiescent resting cells without the death of the infected cells. This cytokine might therefore be tested for its ability to reactivate expression of latent HIV in order to purge this quiescent HIV reservoir.[123-125] A clinical trial using IL-7 in order to reduce the size of the latent reservoir is currently running (ERAMUNE led by C. Katlama; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Another profound therapeutic implication, put forward by Chomont et al.,[10] is that the size of the pool of CD4+ Tcm cells infected by HIV-1 should decrease with early treatment interventions.[126] Indeed, these memory Tcm cells (and the CD8+ T cells) are thought to be very important in the control of HIV infection, as shown in elite controllers.[127,128] Since IL-7 is also involved in CD8+ T cell function and T cell survival,[129-131] an early treatment that combines HAART and IL-7 will certainly help patients to control their HIV-1 infection (i.e. to get a functional cure), but might not allow the eradication of the virus (i.e. to get a sterilizing cure).

A second strategy aiming to develop rational therapeutics to flush out HIV from latency relies on the knowledge of its epigenetic regulation[132] (Figure 1). Several potential interesting candidates have emerged, such as the histone deacetylase (HDAC),[88] the histone methyltransferase,[83,88,133] DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs)[100,101] and proteins from the SWI/SNF chromatin complexes.[134,135] A switch from latent to active transcription has been described following treatment with several HDAC inhibitors such as trichostatin, trapoxin, valproic acid and sodium butyrate.[136-141] Valproic acid has been described to effectively reactivate latent HIV reservoirs in a first clinical trial,[142,143] but two other clinical trials did not confirm this.[144,145] Failure of this first clinical trial might be due to the ineffectiveness of valproic acid in inhibiting HDAC3 activity in CD4 T cells.[146] Indeed, several other HDACs, including HDAC3, contribute to the repression of HIV-1 LTR expression.[147-149] Further investigations are needed using inhibitors against newly identified epigenetic regulators of HIV latency such as chaetocine (a histone methyl transferase inhibitor) or the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, including well-characterized nucleotide analogue methylation inhibitors (5-azacytidine, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, 5-fluoro-2′-deoxycytidine and zebularidine) and non-nucleoside DNA methylation inhibitors (procaine, procainamide, hydralazine and RG108).[78,150] Purging of latent reservoirs could also be achieved by inhibiting regulatory processes that prevent reactivation.[151] The p-TEFb activator HMBA is a promising molecule currently under study. In pilot studies it was able to reactivate latently infected cells and prevent re-infection by down-regulating CD4 receptor expression.[152]

There are several encouraging new directions in the purge of reservoirs that are based on a combination therapy approach,[153] as already used in clinical trials to treat cancer.[154-156] Such an approach has been found to be promising since the association of an HDAC inhibitor or a DNA methylation inhibitor with prostratin has a synergistic effect on the activation of HIV-1 expression.[101,157] The main benefit of this synergistic effect is that we might use drugs at suboptimal concentrations that would be sufficient to reactivate the virus but would have fewer side effects. We believe that the most promising strategy to purge the reservoirs relies on combinations of such drugs, which would be able to force viral gene expression at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels.

Finally, an alternative option has been proposed, which is not based on virus reactivation, but on rendering the virus unable to replicate in latent cells without inducing cell death.[158] This original ‘genome editing therapy’ is based on the recognition of essential sequences within HIV-1, such as the pol gene by zinc finger endonuclease. Such a therapy has already been proposed to disrupt the CCR5 gene, as described previously.[159]

Improving HAART

Why is it important to improve HAART?

There are several reasons why HAART should be improved. One is the existence of a residual viraemia in patients undergoing HAART. The origin of this viraemia is still debated. There are two theories explaining this residual viraemia: (i) long-lived cells containing latent HIV provirus that can produce HIV at low levels following reactivation; and (ii) low-level cryptic on-going replication despite therapy. Latency is best described as a lack of proviral gene expression. In contrast, on-going replication requires continuous viral gene expression without cytopathic effects. Ineffective treatment in cells supporting on-going replication could result from poor drug penetration into sanctuaries such as the brain, where infected microglial cells are located,[160] or from cell-to-cell transfer of the virus.[161] It is important to distinguish between these two theories, since the therapeutic approaches they suggest are essentially different. The theory of on-going replication suggests that drug resistance to treatments might develop. In this case treatment intensification and the design of new anti HIV-1 molecules are needed in the long term. On the other hand, if viruses are released in bursts from stable reservoirs, multidrug resistance does not develop, however, HAART alone is ineffective as well. Several studies have looked at the efficiency of such intensification of HAART on residual viraemia and only one failed to reduce it.[55,162] The second reason to improve HAART is related to the ‘shock and kill’ strategy discussed above. HAART by itself is not able to achieve a cure, but is still needed (to kill) in association with HIV reactivation from quiescent cells (to shock). Finally, emergence of drug resistances, toxicity and compliance with treatment are all obstacles to the current management of HIV-1 infection and therefore need improvement of HAART.[163]

How can we improve HAART?

Current management of HIV-1 treatment is based on seven classes of antiretrovirals: nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), entry/fusion inhibitors (EIs), coreceptor inhibitors (CRIs) and integrase inhibitors (INIs).[164] The therapy of HIV-1-infected patients is based on a combination of three or more drugs from two or more classes.[165]

We believe that new drugs should target other steps of the HIV-1 cycle such as transcription, since there is no drug currently available targeting this step. An increasing number of studies suggest that inhibitors of cellular LTR-binding factors, such as NF-κB and Sp1, repress LTR-driven transcription.[166-170] Recently it has been shown that proteins of the DING family are good candidates to repress HIV-1 gene transcription.[171-173] Indeed, the inhibitory effect of the human DING protein named HPBP (human phosphate binding protein) on HIV-1 replication is very strong,[173] even compared with other canonical drugs currently used in HAART.[174] HPBP is also a potent anti-HIV-1 drug in peripheral blood lymphocytes and in primary macrophages, which is not true for several other anti-HIV-1 drugs. Very interestingly, HPBP, which targets transcription, is as effective against drug-resistant HIV strains as wild-type strains, highlighting the potential therapeutic advantage of HPBP. Moreover, such drugs could also be used to cope with chronic inflammation, which leads to non-AIDS events.[175] We believe that this protein or its derivatives are potentially interesting molecules and deserve further study. As suggested for X-DING-CD4,[172] proteins belonging to the DING protein family might have a role in the innate response to infections, including HIV-1.

Finally, the use of nanotechnology involving structures 1–100 nm in size is an exciting approach since it will make it possible to reduce toxicity and facilitate treatment adherence.[176] Indeed, these nano-delivery systems will permit: (i) modulation of drug release; (ii) protection of drugs from metabolism; and (iii) specific targeting of infected cells, even those located in sanctuaries. In corollary, this approach will allow improved bioavailability and therefore reduce toxicity.[177-179] Among new nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems are liposomes, polymeric micelles, dendrimers and nanosuspensions. Potential uses of these molecules have been reviewed.[176] This elegant approach will surely improve gene therapy, immunotherapy, vaccinology and microbicides.[180]

When to start antiretroviral therapy?

Today there is no real consensus on when HAART should be started. Until now, generally HAART was started when the CD4+ T cell count was below 350 cells/mm3, however, several observations have pointed to a substantial benefit in reduced mortality if treatment is started at an earlier stage with no consideration of CD4+ T cell count.[181,182] This is in agreement with the finding that starting treatment earlier reduced the size of the latently infected reservoirs, as discussed above. Another major concern with starting treatment earlier is that it should reduce the outcome of non-AIDS events and non-AIDS mortality.[183] The cost of the treatment, drug toxicities and non-adherence to the treatment by healthy patients has led some regulatory organizations in Europe not to recommend initiation of HAART in asymptomatic patients or patients having more than 350 CD4+ T cells/mm3.

Conclusions

Are there reasons to be optimistic that a cure for HIV infection may be achieved? From our point of view the answer is ‘yes’, but this will not be achieved in the short term. Advances in some fields are very exciting and offer new opportunities to achieve a cure. For example, using gene therapy to confer HIV resistance (including the CCR5 gene therapy) is a valuable approach compared with chemotherapy, which has several drawbacks, including toxicities, development of resistance and cost. Several gene therapy trials are currently under way,[58] but it is premature to make definitive conclusions regarding the feasibility of these therapies. The ‘holy grail’ for clinicians will be to achieve a sterilizing cure with total eradication of the virus from the body, but we might only get a functional cure, with few patients who control HIV-1 infection (the elite controllers). The major concern with a functional cure will be to drastically reduce the viraemia in order to prevent non-AIDS events. The ‘shock and kill’ strategy has also emerged as an exciting potential way to eliminate the virus. Here, too, we might be able to achieve only a functional cure. The German case is the only case where a possible sterilizing cure has occurred, incidentally indicating a weakness of HIV. Today, however, we are limited by a lack of technology to clearly demonstrate that this patient is definitively cured. The war against this virus is far from over and will need much more work. This review has focused on current therapeutic strategies that could lead in the long term to a cure. From a military point of view, this latter strategy constitutes the first front line. However, to win a war you usually need to open a second front line, and this one is research leading to the development of an HIV vaccine. Even if in practice this approach is not yet working, efforts in this direction must be made, but might require new avenues in HIV immunology research.[36,184-186] Undoubtedly research aiming at a therapeutic cure will benefit from research aiming to develop a vaccine, and vice versa. Reasons to be optimistic come mainly from the intensive efforts made in different fields of research, i.e. a multidisciplinary approach, including immunologists, virologists, molecular biologists, clinicians, pharmacologists, chemists, physicists and mathematicians, who have already opened new ways and elaborated new concepts for therapies that are currently being tested in clinical trials.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) (to O. R., C. S. and R. R.), Sidaction Ligue contre le cancer (to O. R. and C. S.) and Institut Universitaire de France (to O. R.). A. J. is a fellow supported by the “Région Alsace”. V. L. D. is supported by a doctoral grant from the French Ministry of Research. S. A. is supported by a doctoral grant from the Pakistan Ministry of Research.

Transparency declarations

None to declare.