Literature DB >> 14988033

Unconscious odor detection could not be due to odor itself.

Laurence Jacquot1, Julie Monnin, Gérard Brand.   

Abstract

Unconscious odor detection has been demonstrated but the mechanisms implied in this process have been poorly studied. In so far, most odorants activate both olfactory and trigeminal systems, it is relevant to explore how each system could be involved in the unconscious detection processes. This study used three methods to determine the detection thresholds for three odorants. The results showed that (1). psychophysical were lower than self-evaluated thresholds whatever the odorant; (2). an odorant with trigeminal component had the ability to produce an autonomic (skin conductance response-SCR) activation with lower concentrations than psychophysical and self-evaluated thresholds; on the contrary, an odorant, which stimulates only the olfactory system, induces an autonomic activation only with higher concentrations than psychophysical and self-evaluated thresholds. These findings suggest that unconscious odor detection could be due to the trigeminal component of odorants.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14988033     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  8 in total

1.  Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Charles J Wysocki; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Olfaction in the psychosis prodrome: electrophysiological and behavioral measures of odor detection.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shelly Ben-David; Shiva Fekri; Gerard E Bruder; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Transitivity of odor preferences: constant and particularities in hedonic perception.

Authors:  Gérard Brand; Virginie Haaz; Laurence Jacquot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The smell of death: evidence that putrescine elicits threat management mechanisms.

Authors:  Arnaud Wisman; Ilan Shrira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Consequences of a human TRPA1 genetic variant on the perception of nociceptive and olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schütz; Bruno G Oertel; Dirk Heimann; Alexandra Doehring; Carmen Walter; Violeta Dimova; Gerd Geisslinger; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pulse Width Modulation Applied to Olfactory Stimulation for Intensity Tuning.

Authors:  Patrice Andrieu; Pierre-Édouard Billot; Jean-Louis Millot; Tijani Gharbi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Somatosensory Response to Trigeminal Stimulation: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.

Authors:  Christine I Hucke; Marlene Pacharra; Jörg Reinders; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Real and Imagined Smellscapes.

Authors:  PerMagnus Lindborg; Kongmeng Liew
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.