| Literature DB >> 22292935 |
Jing Shi1, Demao Yao, Wei Liu, Na Wang, Hongjun Lv, Guanjun Zhang, Meiju Ji, Li Xu, Nongyue He, Bingyin Shi, Peng Hou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway plays a fundamental role in cell proliferation and survival in human tumorigenesis, including gastric cancer. PIK3CA mutations and amplification are two major causes of overactivation of this pathway in human cancers. However, until this work, there was no sound investigation on the association of PIK3CA mutations and amplification with clinical outcome in gastric cancer, particularly the latter.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22292935 PMCID: PMC3299648 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Association of PIK3CA mutations and amplification with clinicopathologic variables
| Variable | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |||
| No.of patients | 8 | 105 | 88 | 43 | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 5 | 82 | 0.57 | 68 | 34 | 0.82 |
| Female | 3 | 23 | 20 | 9 | ||
| Age, years | ||||||
| Mean | 55.5 | 59.1 | 0.47 | 58.6 | 61.4 | 0.25 |
| SD | 19.8 | 12.7 | 13.3 | 12.1 | ||
| Tumor localization | ||||||
| gastric cardia | 0 | 26 | 0.98 | 23 | 12 | 0.66 |
| gastric body | 5 | 24 | 22 | 12 | ||
| gastric antrum | 3 | 55 | 43 | 19 | ||
| Tumor size (cm3) | ||||||
| ≤ 3 | 3 | 35 | 0.68 | 29 | 14 | 0.88 |
| 3-5 | 3 | 35 | 32 | 15 | ||
| > 5 | 2 | 35 | 27 | 14 | ||
| Differentiation | ||||||
| well/moderate | 1 | 44 | 0.21 | 33 | 23 | 0.08 |
| poor/undifferentiation | 7 | 61 | 55 | 20 | ||
| Tumor invasion | ||||||
| T1 | 2 | 14 | 0.96 | 9 | 5 | 0.59 |
| T2 | 0 | 17 | 15 | 8 | ||
| T3 | 6 | 72 | 62 | 30 | ||
| T4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| I | 2 | 27 | 0.91 | 20 | 10 | 0.86 |
| II | 1 | 14 | 15 | 6 | ||
| III | 5 | 58 | 49 | 25 | ||
| IV | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Residual tumor | ||||||
| Yes | 1 | 12 | 1.00 | 12 | 2 | 0.10 |
| No | 7 | 93 | 76 | 41 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis (LNM) | ||||||
| Yes | 5 | 65 | 1.00 | 57 | 24 | 0.32 |
| No | 3 | 40 | 31 | 19 | ||
| No. of LNM | ||||||
| N0 | 3 | 40 | 0.63 | 31 | 19 | 0.20 |
| N1 (1-6) | 4 | 36 | 32 | 16 | ||
| N2 (7-15) | 1 | 23 | 20 | 7 | ||
| N3 (≥ 16) | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | ||
| Survival status | ||||||
| Dead | 3 | 53 | 0.73 | 51 | 15 | 0.01* |
| Alive | 5 | 52 | 37 | 28 | ||
* Significant at P < 0.05
Figure 1Copy number of the . Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to analyze the copy number of PIK3CA gene in a large cohort of gastric cancers and normal gastric tissues. Details are as described in Methods. Horizonal lines indicate a 95% confidence interval for the sample mean. T, tumor tissues; N, normal gastric tissues.
Figure 2Immunohistostaining of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt): correlation of . (A) Representative samples of immunohistostaining on gastric cancer histologic slides using anti-p-Akt antibodies. Increasing extent of specific staining (brown color) in association with increasing PIK3CA copies (number inside brackets). (B) Association of immunohistostaining (IHS) score of p-Akt with PIK3CA copies on 13 randomly selected gastric cancer samples.
PIK3CA mutations and amplification in gastric cancer--multivariable models assessing tumor size, differentiation, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis and survival status (OR† and 95%CI)
| Factors | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tumor size1 | 0.80 (0.29-2.21) | 0.88 (0.50-1.54) |
| Differentiation2 | 5.53 (0.65-47.4) | 1.85 (0.86-4.02) |
| Tumor stage3 | 1.19 (0.33-4.35) | 0.60 (0.31-1.17) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.32 (0.13-13.6) | 1.44 (0.45-4.58) |
| Survival status4 | 0.41 (0.07-2.41) | 3.50 (1.36-9.00)* |
* Significant at P < 0.05
† OR: odds ratio with 95% confidence interval
1 Tumor size (≤ 3 cm; > 3 cm and ≤ 5 cm; > 5)
2 Differentiation (well or moderate; poor or no differentiation)
3 Tumor stage (I; II; III; IV)
4 Survival status (alive; dead)
Figure 3Effect of residual tumor after surgery on poor survival in gastric cancer. Clinical outcome was evaluated according to the presence of residual tumor after surgery in a number of gastric cancers. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show that the patients with residual tumor after surgery had significantly shorter survival times than the patients without residual tumor (P = 0.01). +, the patients with residual tumor after surgery; -, the patients without residual tumor after surgery.
Figure 4Association of . Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival was performed according to the presence of PIK3CA mutations or amplification in a large cohort of gastric cancers. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves show that PIK3CA mutations were not associated with poor survival of the patients. (B) The patients with PIK3CA amplification had poorer survival than the patients without PIK3CA amplification. (C) PIK3CA amplification was extremely significantly associated with poor survival in the patients who had early-stage tumors (P = 0.004). (D) PIK3CA amplification was marginally significantly associated with poor survival in the patients who had late-stage tumors (P = 0.06). PIK3CA Mu, PIK3CA mutations; PIK3CA Am, PIK3CA amplification; +, harboring PIK3CA mutations or amplification; -, the lack of PIK3CA mutations or amplification.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of clinical variables on overall survival
| Variable | HR† | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.59 | 1.39-4.82 | 0.003 | |
| Age1 | 1.28 | 0.98-1.67 | 0.07 |
| Differentiation2 | 1.16 | 0.66-2.05 | 0.61 |
| Lymph node metastasis3 | 2.70 | 1.01-7.21 | 0.047 |
| TNM stage4 | 2.07 | 1.17-3.65 | 0.01 |
† HR: Hazard Ratio
1 Age (per 10 years)
2 Differentiation (well or moderate; poor or no differentiation)
3 Lymph node metastasis (Yes vs. No)
4 Tumor stage (I; II; III; IV)