| Literature DB >> 22291724 |
Mayumi Tsuji1, Tetsuo Ando, Takao Kitano, Junji Wakamiya, Chihaya Koriyama, Suminori Akiba.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate potential health risk and benefits of fish consumption, the association of fish consumption with total mercury levels in red blood cells (RBCs) and serum eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) concentrations was examined. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study subjects were 269 Japanese (98 men and 171 women) living in a remote island of Kagoshima, and their blood was drawn in 1994.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22291724 PMCID: PMC3265098 DOI: 10.1155/2012/849305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Age specific concentrations of total mercury, EPA, and HDL-EPA.
| Age |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <69 | 70–74 | 75–79 | >80 | ||
| Hg in red blood cells | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | |
| Mean∗2 (ng/g) | 41.9 | 33.9 | 28.2 | 23.7 | <0.001 |
| 95% CI | 33.3–53.4 | 28.6–40.5 | 22.2–36.5 | 17.8–32.4 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 70 | 29 | 30 | 42 | |
| Mean∗2 (ng/g) | 24.3 | 21.7 | 17.6 | 21.7 | 0.114 |
| 95% CI | 20.6 –29.0 | 16.4–29.5 | 13.7–23.0 | 18.0–26.4 | |
|
| |||||
| EPA in sera | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | |
| Mean∗2 (mg/L) | 68.3 | 60.2 | 56.3 | 34.4 | 0.001 |
| 95% CI | 54.0–87.6 | 45.3–81.7 | 42.8–75.5 | 25.4–48.0 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 70 | 29 | 30 | 42 | |
| Mean∗2 (mg/L) | 57.3 | 57.2 | 54.5 | 48.2 | 0.070 |
| 95% CI | 51.4–64.1 | 47.6–69.3 | 46.1–64.8 | 41.3–56.6 | |
|
| |||||
| EPA in the HDL fraction of sera | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 26 | 24 | 24 | 21 | |
| Mean∗2 (mg/L) | 25.0 | 22.6 | 26.1 | 15.9 | 0.076 |
| 95% CI | 19.9–32.0 | 16.8–32.0 | 20.0–35.6 | 12.0–21.7 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 71 | 30 | 29 | 40 | |
| Mean∗2 (mg/L) | 21.1 | 23.8 | 20.8 | 19.1 | 0.350 |
| 95% CI | 18.8–23.7 | 20.2–28.2 | 17.1–25.6 | 16.1–22.9 | |
∗1: The continuous P for trend was calculated by treating age as a continuous variable.
∗2: Geometric mean.
RBC mercury concentration and serum EPA and HDL-EPA levels in association with weekly fish consumption.
| Weekly fish consumption∗1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | >7 |
| |
| Hg levels in RBC | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 14 | 34 | 23 | 21 | |
| Mean Hg∗3 (ng/g) | 50.1 | 41.7 | 35.7 | 51.9 | 0.643 |
| 95% CI | 35.0–71.7 | 32.2–53.8 | 26.5– 48.3 | 38.1–70.8 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 21 | 79 | 45 | 20 | |
| Mean Hg∗3 (ng/g) | 22.1 | 25.2 | 24.1 | 35.1 | 0.035 |
| 95% CI | 15.9–30.7 | 21.2–30.1 | 19.5– 29.7 | 26.1–47.2 | |
|
| |||||
| Serum EPA levels | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 14 | 34 | 23 | 21 | |
| Mean EPA∗3 (mg/L) | 55.9 | 74.5 | 68.3 | 78.2 | 0.207 |
| 95% CI | 36.5–85.8 | 54.9–101.2 | 47.8–97.7 | 54.0– 113.2 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 21 | 79 | 45 | 20 | |
| Mean EPA∗3 (mg/L) | 59.0 | 57.5 | 60.6 | 63.2 | 0.582 |
| 95% CI | 45.8–75.8 | 50.7–65.3 | 52.1–70.4 | 51.2–78.0 | |
|
| |||||
| EPA levels in serum HDL fraction | |||||
| Men | |||||
|
| 14 | 34 | 23 | 21 | |
| Mean∗3 (mg/L) | 21.2 | 23.5 | 29.6 | 33.2 | 0.014 |
| 95% CI | 14.1–31.8 | 17.6–31.5 | 21.0–41.8 | 23.3–47.3 | |
| Women | |||||
|
| 21 | 79 | 45 | 20 | |
| Mean∗3 (mg/L) | 17.9 | 21.4 | 22.8 | 25.0 | 0.073 |
| 95% CI | 13.5–23.7 | 18.6–24.7 | 19.3–27.0 | 19.8–31.5 | |
∗1: Raw fish (times/week) + fish-paste products (times/week) + dry-fish (times/week).
∗2: When calculating P values, age was always included in the models as a covariate. Trend of association was assessed by a regression model assigning consecutive integers to the levels of the weekly fish consumption.
∗3: Geometric mean.
Total mercury concentration (ng/g) in red blood cells by EPA and HDL-EPA levels.
| Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBC Hg levels | RBC Hg levels | |||||
|
| Mean∗1 (ng/g) | 95% CI |
| Mean∗1 (ng/g) | 95% CI | |
| EPA levels in sera (mg/L) | ||||||
| <40 | 26 | 39.0 | 28.3–53.8 | 36 | 21.2 | 16.6–27.0 |
| 40– | 27 | 33.1 | 24.6–44.6 | 55 | 24.7 | 20.2–30.4 |
| 60– | 11 | 54.7 | 38.9–76.9 | 46 | 27.2 | 22.1–33.4 |
| 80+ | 33 | 44.9 | 34.5–58.4 | 32 | 33.1 | 25.7–42.5 |
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| EPA levels in HDL fraction of sera (mg/L) | ||||||
| <15 | 23 | 43.8 | 31.6–60.7 | 32 | 21.6 | 17.0–27.4 |
| 15– | 26 | 39.8 | 29.8–53.2 | 78 | 24.2 | 20.3–28.8 |
| 25– | 12 | 45.7 | 31.1–67.2 | 30 | 31.8 | 24.6–41.0 |
| 35+ | 34 | 46.1 | 35.4–60.2 | 30 | 35.1 | 27.2–45.4 |
|
|
| |||||
∗1: Geometric mean.
∗2: When calculating P values, age was always included in the models as a covariate. The continuous P for trend was calculated by treating the EPA level as a continuous variable.
The results of logistic regression analysis regarding the sex difference of the forms of fish consumed.
| Men | Women | OR (95% CI)∗1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekly fish consumption |
|
| |||
| Raw fish | |||||
| −1 | 4 | 14 | 1 (reference) | ||
| 2+ | 96 | 169 | 2.0 (0.6–6.0) |
| |
| Fish-paste products | |||||
| −1 | 76 | 144 | 1 (reference) | ||
| 2+ | 24 | 39 | 1.1 (0.6–2.0) |
| |
| Dry fish | |||||
| −1 | 54 | 46 | 1 (reference) | ||
| 2+ | 46 | 65 | 1.5 (0.9–2.5) |
|
∗1: When calculating P values, age was always included in the models as a covariate.