Literature DB >> 22290624

A fragment-based approach to the SAMPL3 Challenge.

John L Kulp1, Seth N Blumenthal, Qiang Wang, Richard L Bryan, Frank Guarnieri.   

Abstract

The success of molecular fragment-based design depends critically on the ability to make predictions of binding poses and of affinity ranking for compounds assembled by linking fragments. The SAMPL3 Challenge provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art fragment-based design methodology with respect to these requirements. In this article, we present results derived from linking fragments to predict affinity and pose in the SAMPL3 Challenge. The goal is to demonstrate how incorporating different aspects of modeling protein-ligand interactions impact the accuracy of the predictions, including protein dielectric models, charged versus neutral ligands, ΔΔGs solvation energies, and induced conformational stress. The core method is based on annealing of chemical potential in a Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GC/MC) simulation. By imposing an initially very high chemical potential and then automatically running a sequence of simulations at successively decreasing chemical potentials, the GC/MC simulation efficiently discovers statistical distributions of bound fragment locations and orientations not found reliably without the annealing. This method accounts for configurational entropy, the role of bound water molecules, and results in a prediction of all the locations on the protein that have any affinity for the fragment. Disregarding any of these factors in affinity-rank prediction leads to significantly worse correlation with experimentally-determined free energies of binding. We relate three important conclusions from this challenge as applied to GC/MC: (1) modeling neutral ligands--regardless of the charged state in the active site--produced better affinity ranking than using charged ligands, although, in both cases, the poses were almost exactly overlaid; (2) simulating explicit water molecules in the GC/MC gave better affinity and pose predictions; and (3) applying a ΔΔGs solvation correction further improved the ranking of the neutral ligands. Using the GC/MC method under a variety of parameters in the blinded SAMPL3 Challenge provided important insights to the relevant parameters and boundaries in predicting binding affinities using simulated annealing of chemical potential calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22290624     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9546-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  21 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Improved Treatment of Ligands and Coupling Effects in Empirical Calculation and Rationalization of pKa Values.

Authors:  Chresten R Søndergaard; Mats H M Olsson; Michał Rostkowski; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions.

Authors:  Mats H M Olsson; Chresten R Søndergaard; Michal Rostkowski; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase.

Authors:  David A Pearlman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Practical aspects of the SAMPL challenge: providing an extensive experimental data set for the modeling community.

Authors:  Janet Newman; Vincent J Fazio; Tom T Caradoc-Davies; Kim Branson; Thomas S Peat
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2009-12

8.  Compound Design by Fragment-Linking.

Authors:  Osamu Ichihara; John Barker; Richard J Law; Mark Whittaker
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.353

9.  Conformational memories with variable bond angles.

Authors:  Robert M Whitnell; Dow P Hurst; Patricia H Reggio; Frank Guarnieri
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Impact of linker strain and flexibility in the design of a fragment-based inhibitor.

Authors:  Suhman Chung; Jared B Parker; Mario Bianchet; L Mario Amzel; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 15.040

View more
  9 in total

1.  Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of renin inhibitors guided by simulated annealing of chemical potential simulations.

Authors:  Ian S Cloudsdale; John K Dickson; Thomas E Barta; Brian S Grella; Emilie D Smith; John L Kulp; Frank Guarnieri; John L Kulp
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Shuai Liu; Nathan M Lim; Karisa L Wymer; Alexander L Perryman; Stefano Forli; Nanjie Deng; Justin Su; Kim Branson; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl.

Authors:  Matthew J Bick; Per J Greisen; Kevin J Morey; Mauricio S Antunes; David La; Banumathi Sankaran; Luc Reymond; Kai Johnsson; June I Medford; David Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Hot-spot identification on a broad class of proteins and RNA suggest unifying principles of molecular recognition.

Authors:  John L Kulp; Ian S Cloudsdale; John L Kulp; Frank Guarnieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fragment-based design of small molecule PCSK9 inhibitors using simulated annealing of chemical potential simulations.

Authors:  Frank Guarnieri; John L Kulp; John L Kulp; Ian S Cloudsdale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.

Authors:  Harold Grosjean; Mehtap Işık; Anthony Aimon; David Mobley; John Chodera; Frank von Delft; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.179

8.  Multipose binding in molecular docking.

Authors:  Kalina Atkovska; Sergey A Samsonov; Maciej Paszkowski-Rogacz; M Teresa Pisabarro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Evaluation of log P, pKa, and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Nicolas Tielker; Yingying Zhang; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Karol Francisco; Carlo Ballatore; Stefan M Kast; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.