Literature DB >> 22290071

Pupil dynamics in Chinese subjects with angle closure.

Ce Zheng1, Carol Y Cheung, Arun Narayanaswamy, Sim-Heng Ong, Shamira A Perera, Mani Baskaran, Paul T Chew, David S Friedman, Tin Aung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the speed of pupil constriction (SPC) in response to a standardized change in illumination from dark to light using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in eyes with closed angles, compared to those with open angles.
METHODS: This was a prospective, comparative, observational study. Study subjects with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and/or primary angle-closure (PAC) were recruited along with a group of normal as controls. Videos of iris and anterior segment changes in response to illumination were captured with real-time video recording from AS-OCT and analysed frame by frame, beginning from a dilated to a constricted pupil. Customized software was used to measure speed of iris constriction, anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber width (ACW), iris thickness, and pupil diameter (PD). SPC was defined as the rate of pupil diameter change in response to illumination.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty three Chinese subjects were recruited in this study. A total of 137 of 163 eligible videos (82.5%) were available for analysis, comprising 87 subjects with closed angles (all had undergone laser peripheral iridotomies before) and 50 with open angles. SPC was less in eyes with closed angles (1.22 mm/sec vs 1.56 mm/sec, p<0.001), after adjusting for age and ACW, and was positively correlated with axial length, ACD, anterior chamber angle status, PD in the dark, and iris thickness in the dark, (all r>0.2, all p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, SPC was independently associated with anterior chamber angle status (closed angle vs open angle) (β=0.276, p=0.016) and PD in dark (β= 0.129, p=0.009), after adjusting for age, ACW, ACD, iris thickness and vertical cup-to-disc ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those with open angles, eyes with closed angles in Chinese subjects have slower speed of pupil constriction in response to dark-light change, even after adjusting for biometric factors associated with angle closure. The results suggest that differences in irido-pupillary dynamics may play a role in the pathogenesis of angle closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22290071     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-1934-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic analysis of iris configuration with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Carol Yim-lui Cheung; Shu Liu; Robert N Weinreb; Jing Liu; Haitao Li; Dexter Yu-lung Leung; Syril Dorairaj; Jeffrey Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam; Christopher Kai-shun Leung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Pupillographic measurements with pattern stimulation: the pupil's response in normal subjects and first measurements in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Anselm Jünemann; Rainer Rix; Otto Sembritzki; Alexander Brenning; Matthias Korth; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations.

Authors:  N G Congdon; Q Youlin; H Quigley; P T Hung; T H Wang; T C Ho; J M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Posterior corneal curvature. Correlations in normal eyes and in eyes involved with primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  R F Lowe; B A Clark
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Effect of brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% on pupil size in normal eyes under different luminance conditions.

Authors:  J E McDonald; A M El-Moatassem Kotb; B B Decker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects.

Authors:  C J Ellis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations.

Authors:  Tin Aung; Winifred P Nolan; David Machin; Steve K L Seah; Jamyanjav Baasanhu; Peng T Khaw; Gordon J Johnson; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04

8.  Angle-closure glaucoma-simpler answers to complex mechanisms: LXVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Determinants of angle closure in older Singaporeans.

Authors:  Raghavan Lavanya; Tien-Yin Wong; David S Friedman; Han T Aung; Tamuno Alfred; Hong Gao; Steve K Seah; Kenji Kashiwagi; Paul J Foster; Tin Aung
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-05

10.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  G Marchini; A Pagliarusco; A Toscano; R Tosi; C Brunelli; L Bonomi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Determinants of pupil diameters and pupil dynamics in an adult Chinese population.

Authors:  Ce Zheng; John Mark S de Leon; Carol Y Cheung; Arun K Narayanaswamy; Sim-Heng Ong; Clement W Tan; Paul T Chew; Shamira A Perera; Tien Y Wong; Tin Aung
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of dynamic changes in anterior ocular structures examined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography in a cohort of various origins.

Authors:  Fiona E Seager; Joan L Jefferys; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Distinct iris gene expression profiles of primary angle closure glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma and their interaction with ocular biometric parameters.

Authors:  Li-Fong Seet; Arun Narayanaswamy; Sharon N Finger; Hla M Htoon; Monisha E Nongpiur; Li Zhen Toh; Henrietta Ho; Shamira A Perera; Tina T Wong
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles.

Authors:  A V Rukmini; Raymond P Najjar; Eray Atalay; Sourabh Sharma; Jing Zhan Lock; Mani Baskaran; Monisha Nongpiur; Joshua J Gooley; Tin Aung; Dan Milea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Intradevice Repeatability and Interdevice Agreement of Ocular Biometric Measurements: A Comparison of Two Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Devices.

Authors:  Anmol A Pardeshi; Abe E Song; Naim Lazkani; Xiaobin Xie; Alex Huang; Benjamin Y Xu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.