Literature DB >> 22287674

Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane-based diets.

R B A Hulshof1, A Berndt, W J J Gerrits, J Dijkstra, S M van Zijderveld, J R Newbold, H B Perdok.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of dietary nitrate on methane emission and rumen fermentation parameters in Nellore × Guzera (Bos indicus) beef cattle fed a sugarcane based diet. The experiment was conducted with 16 steers weighing 283 ± 49 kg (mean ± SD), 6 rumen cannulated and 10 intact steers, in a cross-over design. The animals were blocked according to BW and presence or absence of rumen cannula and randomly allocated to either the nitrate diet (22 g nitrate/kg DM) or the control diet made isonitrogenous by the addition of urea. The diets consisted of freshly chopped sugarcane and concentrate (60:40 on DM basis), fed as a mixed ration. A 16-d adaptation period was used to allow the rumen microbes to adapt to dietary nitrate. Methane emission was measured using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Dry matter intake (P = 0.09) tended to be less when nitrate was present in the diet compared with the control, 6.60 and 7.05 kg/d DMI, respectively. The daily methane production was reduced (P < 0.01) by 32% when steers were fed the nitrate diet (85 g/d) compared with the urea diet (125 g/d). Methane emission per kilogram DMI was 27% less (P < 0.01) on the nitrate diet (13.3 g methane/kg DMI) than on the control diet (18.2 g methane/kg DMI). Methane losses as a fraction of gross energy intake (GEI) were less (P < 0.01) on the nitrate diet (4.2% of GEI) than on the control diet (5.9% of GEI). Nitrate mitigated enteric methane production by 87% of the theoretical potential. The rumen fluid ammonia-nitrogen (NH(3)-N()) concentration was significantly greater (P < 0.05) for the nitrate diet. The total concentration of VFA was not affected (P = 0.61) by nitrate in the diet, while the proportion of acetic acid tended to be greater (P = 0.09), propionic acid less (P = 0.06) and acetate/propionate ratio tended to be greater (P = 0.06) for the nitrate diet. Dietary nitrate reduced enteric methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane based diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287674     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Targeting methanogenesis with a nitrooxypropanol bullet.

Authors:  Stephen W Ragsdale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of Hydrogen-Consuming Compounds on In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation, Fatty Acids Profile, and Microbial Community in Water Buffalo.

Authors:  Yanxia Guo; Faiz-Ul Hassan; Mengwei Li; Zhenhua Tang; Lijuan Peng; Kaiping Peng; Chengjian Yang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on enteric methane production, nutrient digestibility, and liver mineral concentration of beef cattle.

Authors:  Darren D Henry; Francine M Ciriaco; Rafael C Araujo; Pedro L P Fontes; Nicola Oosthuizen; Lautaro Rostoll-Cangiano; Carla D Sanford; Tessa M Schulmeister; Jose C B Dubeux; Graham Cliff Lamb; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed.

Authors:  Dieter Schrenk; Margherita Bignami; Laurent Bodin; James Kevin Chipman; Jesús Del Mazo; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom; Jean-Charles Leblanc; Carlo Stefano Nebbia; Elsa Nielsen; Evangelia Ntzani; Annette Petersen; Salomon Sand; Tanja Schwerdtle; Christiane Vleminckx; Heather Wallace; Vasileios Bampidis; Bruce Cottrill; Maria Jose Frutos; Peter Furst; Anthony Parker; Marco Binaglia; Anna Christodoulidou; Petra Gergelova; Irene Munoz Guajardo; Carina Wenger; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2020-11-04

5.  Effects of Nitrate Addition on Rumen Fermentation, Bacterial Biodiversity and Abundance.

Authors:  Liping Zhao; Qingxiang Meng; Liping Ren; Wei Liu; Xinzhuang Zhang; Yunlong Huo; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock.

Authors:  Chengjian Yang; John A Rooke; Irene Cabeza; Robert J Wallace
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The effect of feeding high fat diet to beef cattle on manure composition and gaseous emission from a feedlot pen surface.

Authors:  Dhan Prasad Gautam; Shafiqur Rahman; Md Saidul Borhan; Chanda Engel
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-10

8.  Effects of Adaptation of In vitro Rumen Culture to Garlic Oil, Nitrate, and Saponin and Their Combinations on Methanogenesis, Fermentation, and Abundances and Diversity of Microbial Populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows?

Authors:  Jolien B Veneman; Stefan Muetzel; Kenton J Hart; Catherine L Faulkner; Jon M Moorby; Hink B Perdok; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Insights on Alterations to the Rumen Ecosystem by Nitrate and Nitrocompounds.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Latham; Robin C Anderson; William E Pinchak; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.