Literature DB >> 29562835

A Guide for Using Mechanical Stimulation to Enhance Tissue-Engineered Articular Cartilage Properties.

Evelia Y Salinas1, Jerry C Hu1, Kyriacos Athanasiou1.   

Abstract

The use of tissue-engineered articular cartilage (TEAC) constructs has the potential to become a powerful treatment option for cartilage lesions resulting from trauma or early stages of pathology. Although fundamental tissue-engineering strategies based on the use of scaffolds, cells, and signals have been developed, techniques that lead to biomimetic AC constructs that can be translated to in vivo use are yet to be fully confirmed. Mechanical stimulation during tissue culture can be an effective strategy to enhance the mechanical, structural, and cellular properties of tissue-engineered constructs toward mimicking those of native AC. This review focuses on the use of mechanical stimulation to attain and enhance the properties of AC constructs needed to translate these implants to the clinic. In vivo, mechanical loading at maximal and supramaximal physiological levels has been shown to be detrimental to AC through the development of degenerative changes. In contrast, multiple studies have revealed that during culture, mechanical stimulation within narrow ranges of magnitude and duration can produce anisotropic, mechanically robust AC constructs with high cellular viability. Significant progress has been made in evaluating a variety of mechanical stimulation techniques on TEAC, either alone or in combination with other stimuli. These advancements include determining and optimizing efficacious loading parameters (e.g., duration and frequency) to yield improvements in construct design criteria, such as collagen II content, compressive stiffness, cell viability, and fiber organization. With the advancement of mechanical stimulation as a potent strategy in AC tissue engineering, a compendium detailing the results achievable by various stimulus regimens would be of great use for researchers in academia and industry. The objective is to list the qualitative and quantitative effects that can be attained when direct compression, hydrostatic pressure, shear, and tensile loading are used to tissue-engineer AC. Our goal is to provide a practical guide to their use and optimization of loading parameters. For each loading condition, we will also present and discuss benefits and limitations of bioreactor configurations that have been used. The intent is for this review to serve as a reference for including mechanical stimulation strategies as part of AC construct culture regimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  articular cartilage; compression; hydrostatic pressure; mechanical stimulation; shear; tension

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29562835      PMCID: PMC6199627          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  101 in total

1.  Effect of a mechanical stimulation bioreactor on tissue engineered, scaffold-free cartilage.

Authors:  Scott C Tran; Avery J Cooley; Steven H Elder
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The role of collagen in bone strength.

Authors:  S Viguet-Carrin; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) of glycosaminoglycans.

Authors:  A Calabro; R Midura; A Wang; L West; A Plaas; V C Hascall
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Paralysis and growth of the musculoskeletal system in the embryonic chick.

Authors:  B K Hall; S W Herring
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  The effect of intermittent static biaxial tensile strains on tissue engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Jackie C Y Fan; Stephen D Waldman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Cross-linking of collagen. Location of pyridinoline in bovine articular cartilage at two sites of the molecule.

Authors:  S P Robins; A Duncan
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1983-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Articular chondrocytes derived from distinct tissue zones differentially respond to in vitro oscillatory tensile loading.

Authors:  E J Vanderploeg; C G Wilson; M E Levenston
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Effects of temporal hydrostatic pressure on tissue-engineered bovine articular cartilage constructs.

Authors:  Benjamin D Elder; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Tension stimulation drives tissue formation in scaffold-free systems.

Authors:  Jennifer K Lee; Le W Huwe; Nikolaos Paschos; Ashkan Aryaei; Courtney A Gegg; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  22 in total

1.  Considerations for translation of tissue engineered fibrocartilage from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ryan P Donahue; Erik A Gonzalez-Leon; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Shear stress induced by fluid flow produces improvements in tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  E Y Salinas; A Aryaei; N Paschos; E Berson; H Kwon; J C Hu; K A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 9.954

3.  Collagen: quantification, biomechanics, and role of minor subtypes in cartilage.

Authors:  Benjamin J Bielajew; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 66.308

4.  The functionality and translatability of neocartilage constructs are improved with the combination of fluid-induced shear stress and bioactive factors.

Authors:  Evelia Y Salinas; Ryan P Donahue; Jessica M Herrera; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.834

Review 5.  Ontogeny informs regeneration: explant models to investigate the role of the extracellular matrix in cartilage tissue assembly and development.

Authors:  Kaitlin P McCreery; Sarah Calve; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.417

6.  Research progress on tissue engineering in repairing tempomandibular joint.

Authors:  Chenyu Wang; Yingnan Wang; Cunyi Wang; Jiejun Shi; Huiming Wang
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-04-25

7.  Intracellular Calcium and Sodium Modulation of Self-Assembled Neocartilage Using Costal Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Gaston A Otarola; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.080

8.  Chitosan-cartilage extracellular matrix hybrid scaffold induces chondrogenic differentiation to adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  I-Chan Lin; Tsung-Jen Wang; Chien-Liang Wu; Dai-Hua Lu; Yi-Ru Chen; Kai-Chiang Yang
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.419

9.  Cartilage Assessment Requires a Surface Characterization Protocol: Roughness, Friction, and Function.

Authors:  M Gabriela Espinosa; Gaston A Otarola; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.056

10.  Numerical Simulation of Electroactive Hydrogels for Cartilage-Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Abdul Razzaq Farooqi; Julius Zimmermann; Rainer Bader; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.