Literature DB >> 22285571

QSAR studies for prediction of cross-β sheet aggregate binding affinity and selectivity.

Katryna Cisek1, Jeff Kuret.   

Abstract

Protein aggregates that accumulate in neurodegenerative diseases are important targets of radiotracer discovery efforts. Although multiple scaffold classes have been reported to bind cross-β sheet structure, their mechanism of binding and their ability to interact selectively with aggregates of varying protein composition are not well understood. Here we take a ligand-based quantitative structure-activity relationship approach to identify descriptors of binding affinity and selectivity for a series of 50 closely related benzothiazole derivatives reported to displace Thioflavin T fluorescent probe from synthetic aggregates composed of β-amyloid peptide and insulin. Using a two-step workflow involving both partial least squares and multiple linear regression methods, compound polarizability and hydrophobicity were identified as tunable mediators of binding selectivity. The correlations also revealed how polarizability could be modulated in neutral compounds having push-pull character. These data suggest that the relative affinity of small molecules for binding sites exposed on aggregate surfaces can be modulated by simple chemical design considerations that are compatible with multiple scaffolds.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285571      PMCID: PMC3276690          DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.12.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem        ISSN: 0968-0896            Impact factor:   3.641


  28 in total

1.  Virtual computational chemistry laboratory--design and description.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Johann Gasteiger; Roberto Todeschini; Andrea Mauri; David Livingstone; Peter Ertl; Vladimir A Palyulin; Eugene V Radchenko; Nikolay S Zefirov; Alexander S Makarenko; Vsevolod Yu Tanchuk; Volodymyr V Prokopenko
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Understanding adsorption phenomena: investigation of the dye-cellulose interaction.

Authors:  Jayne Bird; Neil Brough; Sarah Dixon; Stephen N Batchelor
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Evidence for the presence of three distinct binding sites for the thioflavin T class of Alzheimer's disease PET imaging agents on beta-amyloid peptide fibrils.

Authors:  Andrew Lockhart; Liang Ye; Duncan B Judd; Andy T Merritt; Peter N Lowe; Jennifer L Morgenstern; Guizhu Hong; Antony D Gee; John Brown
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  y-Randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR.

Authors:  Christoph Rücker; Gerta Rücker; Markus Meringer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Atomic structures of amyloid cross-beta spines reveal varied steric zippers.

Authors:  Michael R Sawaya; Shilpa Sambashivan; Rebecca Nelson; Magdalena I Ivanova; Stuart A Sievers; Marcin I Apostol; Michael J Thompson; Melinda Balbirnie; Jed J W Wiltzius; Heather T McFarlane; Anders Ø Madsen; Christian Riekel; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ligand polarizability contributes to tau fibril binding affinity.

Authors:  Jordan R Jensen; Katryna Cisek; Nicolette S Honson; Jeff Kuret
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Change correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  J G Topliss; R J Costello
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  On the origin of the stronger binding of PIB over thioflavin T to protofibrils of the Alzheimer amyloid-β peptide: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Chun Wu; Michael T Bowers; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Differentiating Alzheimer disease-associated aggregates with small molecules.

Authors:  Nicolette S Honson; Ronald L Johnson; Wenwei Huang; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin; Jeff Kuret
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Dissecting molecular mechanisms in the living brain of dementia patients.

Authors:  Jorge R Barrio; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Sung-Cheng Huang; Andrej Petric; Gary W Small; Vladimir Kepe
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  5 in total

1.  Structural determinants of Tau aggregation inhibitor potency.

Authors:  Kelsey N Schafer; Katryna Cisek; Carol J Huseby; Edward Chang; Jeff Kuret
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Ligand electronic properties modulate tau filament binding site density.

Authors:  Katryna Cisek; Jordan R Jensen; Nicolette S Honson; Kelsey N Schafer; Grace L Cooper; Jeff Kuret
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  What amyloid ligands can tell us about molecular polymorphism and disease.

Authors:  Harry LeVine; Lary C Walker
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Ruthenium red colorimetric and birefringent staining of amyloid-β aggregates in vitro and in Tg2576 mice.

Authors:  Nathan P Cook; Clarissa M Archer; Janelle N Fawver; Hayley E Schall; Jennifer Rodriguez-Rivera; Kelly T Dineley; Angel A Martí; Ian V J Murray
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 5.  Dye-binding assays for evaluation of the effects of small molecule inhibitors on amyloid (aβ) self-assembly.

Authors:  Laramie P Jameson; Nicholas W Smith; Sergei V Dzyuba
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.