PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance characteristics of computed tomography (CT) for determining union of scaphoid waist fractures. METHODS: A total of 59 orthopedic and trauma surgeons rated for union a set of 30 sagittal CT scans of 30 scaphoid waist fractures. Of these fractures, 20 were treated nonoperatively, were imaged between 6 and 10 weeks after injury, and were known to have eventually achieved union. Ten were operatively confirmed to be ununited. We rated each scan as united or ununited using a Web-based rating application. We assessed interobserver reliability using Siegel's multirater Kappa. We calculated diagnostic performance characteristics using Bayesian formulas. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement among 59 raters was substantial. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing union of scaphoid waist fractures on sagittal CT scans were 78%, 96%, and 84%, respectively. Assuming a 90% prevalence of fracture union of the scaphoid, the positive predictive value of a diagnosis of union on sagittal CT scan was 0.99 and the negative predictive value was 0.41. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CT scans are accurate and reliable for diagnosis of union but inadequate for ruling out nonunion of scaphoid waist fractures between 6 and 10 weeks after injury. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.
PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance characteristics of computed tomography (CT) for determining union of scaphoid waist fractures. METHODS: A total of 59 orthopedic and trauma surgeons rated for union a set of 30 sagittal CT scans of 30 scaphoid waist fractures. Of these fractures, 20 were treated nonoperatively, were imaged between 6 and 10 weeks after injury, and were known to have eventually achieved union. Ten were operatively confirmed to be ununited. We rated each scan as united or ununited using a Web-based rating application. We assessed interobserver reliability using Siegel's multirater Kappa. We calculated diagnostic performance characteristics using Bayesian formulas. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement among 59 raters was substantial. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing union of scaphoid waist fractures on sagittal CT scans were 78%, 96%, and 84%, respectively. Assuming a 90% prevalence of fracture union of the scaphoid, the positive predictive value of a diagnosis of union on sagittal CT scan was 0.99 and the negative predictive value was 0.41. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CT scans are accurate and reliable for diagnosis of union but inadequate for ruling out nonunion of scaphoid waist fractures between 6 and 10 weeks after injury. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.
Authors: Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Jay Toor; Christian Amaechi; Mario Maas; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman; Peter Kloen Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2016-10
Authors: P F W Hannemann; L Brouwers; D van der Zee; A Stadler; K W A Gottgens; R Weijers; M Poeze; P R G Brink Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Jos J Mellema; Wouter H Mallee; Thierry G Guitton; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring; Job N Doornberg Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Lucia Calisto Farracho; Berenice Moutinot; Angeliki Neroladaki; Marion Hamard; Karel Gorican; Pierre Alexandre Poletti; Jean Yves Beaulieu; Cindy Bouvet; Sana Boudabbous Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2020-09-02