Combining long-range magnetic order with polarity in the same structure is a prerequisite for the design of (magnetoelectric) multiferroic materials. There are now several demonstrated strategies to achieve this goal, but retaining magnetic order above room temperature remains a difficult target. Iron oxides in the +3 oxidation state have high magnetic ordering temperatures due to the size of the coupled moments. Here we prepare and characterize ScFeO(3) (SFO), which under pressure and in strain-stabilized thin films adopts a polar variant of the corundum structure, one of the archetypal binary oxide structures. Polar corundum ScFeO(3) has a weak ferromagnetic ground state below 356 K-this is in contrast to the purely antiferromagnetic ground state adopted by the well-studied ferroelectric BiFeO(3).
Combining long-range magnetic order with polarity in the same structure is a prerequisite for the design of (magnetoelectric) multiferroic materials. There are now several demonstrated strategies to achieve this goal, but retaining magnetic order above room temperature remains a difficult target. Iron oxides in the +3 oxidation state have high magnetic ordering temperatures due to the size of the coupled moments. Here we prepare and characterize ScFeO(3) (SFO), which under pressure and in strain-stabilized thin films adopts a polar variant of the corundum structure, one of the archetypal binary oxide structures. Polar corundum ScFeO(3) has a weak ferromagnetic ground state below 356 K-this is in contrast to the purely antiferromagnetic ground state adopted by the well-studied ferroelectric BiFeO(3).
In recent years, multiferroic materials
(specifically materials
with permanent magnetization and electrical polarization) have attracted
great interest, as controlling the magnetic state through the application
of an electric field is an enabling feature for novel technologies.[1−5] However, materials with multiferroic order above room temperature
are rare due to the contraindicated nature of magnetism and polar
order.[6,7] The most studied systems currently have
very small polarizations (structurally undetectable) that are driven
by the onset of magnetic order, which lifts the centers of symmetry
present in the paramagnetic state.[1,4,5,7] In most of the observed
cases, the transitions occur well below room temperature, for room
temperature magnetoelectric phenomena, currently the best candidates
are the hexaferrites and related phases.[5,8,9] Many ferroelectrics are based on d0 structures
whereas magnetism clearly requires the presence of open shell cations.
BiFeO3 can be seen as an archetype for an alternative approach
where two sublattices are combined where one is ferroelectrically
active and the other magnetically, though in this case, at least near
room temperature, the system is purely antiferromagnetically ordered.[10] Given the higher ordering temperatures of antiferromagnets,
multiferroics with weak ferromagnetism would show promise in this
property control.[11,12] A two sublattice approach has
proved successful in EuTiO3[13] (where lattice strain in a thin film drives a quantum paraelectric
to a ferroelectric phase transition) with the magnetic ordering from
Eu2+ occurring at low temperature. High pressure has been
used to convert the layered ilmenite FeTiO3 into a polar
LiNbO3 polymorph which shows weak ferromagnetism well below
room temperature,[12] with AF order up to
270 K found in the partially ordered (In1–M)MO3 (M = Fe1/2Mn1/2; x = 0.143)[14,15] LiNbO3 phases.[14−16] Thus, new approaches are needed
to increase the temperature of coexistence. We present an alternative
approach to generating polarization and magnetization above room temperature
by preparing a new polar polymorph of ScFeO3 (SFO) using
high pressure synthesis and biaxial strain based on the corundum structure,
which exhibits weak ferromagnetism with an ordering temperature of
356 K. The reported SFO structure is in contrast to the perovskite-derived
ScCrO3[17] and ScVO3,[18] which are also formed at high pressure
for earlier first transition series cations.
Experimental Methods
ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0–1) was prepared
from stoichiometric mixtures of Sc2O3 (99.999%,
Sigma Aldrich), Fe2O3 (99.999%, Alpha Aesar),
and Cr2O3 (99.997%, Alpha Aesar) reacted at
1500 °C (x = 0), 1480 °C (x = 0.03), and 1450 °C (x = 0.10–1) at
6 GPa for 5 min in a Pt-lined Al2O3 crucible
within a cylindrical graphite furnace in a Walker-type multianvil
press and then quenched to room temperature by turning off the voltage
supply to the resistance furnace, which reduces the temperature from
1500 to 25 °C in ∼2 s. The pressure is maintained during
the temperature quenching.Thin films were grown using a Neocera
pulsed laser deposition (PLD)
chamber equipped with Staib RHEED. A stoichiometric ScFeO3 ceramic target, made by conventional solid state methods, was used
in the PLD at a laser energy of 252 mJ over a spot size of approximately
2–3 mm2. The films were grown in an oxygen partial
pressure of 2 mTorr. The substrate was held at the temperature 850
°C and the distance from the target 47 mm. A 30 kV electron beam
was used in the RHEED at a current of 1.55 A. During cooling, the
partial oxygen pressure was held at 150 Torr.(a) Sc2O3 (bixbyite, Ia3̅) viewed
along [100]; (b) α-Fe2O3 (corundum, R3̅c) structure,
viewed along [110].Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were recorded on instrument
ID31 (for x = 0 over a range of temperatures, λ
= 0.3999 Å) at ESRF, Grenoble. Anomalous scattering data were
collected on instrument I11 at Diamond Light Source (DLS). The sample
was loaded on the external surface of a quartz capillary (diameter
0.5 mm) to minimize absorption.[19] A monochromator
scan was used to measure the Fe K edge fluorescence spectrum. High
resolution X-ray diffraction patterns were then recorded for 2 h each
at six selected energies near the Fe K absorption edge: 7.050, 7.080,
7.112, 7.138, 7.165, and 7.190 keV. The six diffraction patterns
were fitted simultaneously using the TOPAS[20] software package. The peak shape parameters were constrained to
be the same for the six patterns during refinement. Sample absorption
was fitted using the Pitschke model[21−23] for surface roughness
in the TOPAS software package.Neutron powder diffraction (NPD)
data were collected on the POLARIS
instrument at the ISIS facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratories.
Diffraction data analysis was performed with the GSAS[24] suite of Rietveld analysis programs, using the EXPGUI[25] interface. Magnetic structures were modeled
using a P1 magnetic only phase:[26] atomic
positions and lattice tensors were fixed/constrained to maintain the
nuclear cell and symmetry. The magnetic models were constructed via
the representational analysis of the system using SARAh.[27] Structural figures were generated using VESTA.[28]Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED)
and energy dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were performed with a JEOL 2000FX electron
microscope. High angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron
microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images were recorded on a Tecnai G2 microscope
operated at 200 kV and on a Titan G3 80-300 microscope equipped with
the probe aberration corrector and operated at 300 kV. Calculated
HAADF-STEM images were obtained using the QSTEM software.[29] Imaging of ceramics used in PFM measurements
revealed no change in phase composition at the grain boundaries.Mössbauer data were obtained using a conventional constant
acceleration Mössbauer spectrometer incorporating a ∼25
mCi source of Co57 in a Rh matrix. Alternating current
and direct current magnetization measurements were carried out with
a commercial Quantum Design superconducting quantum interference device
(SQUID) magnetometer. We have measured the dielectric and ferroelectric
properties of the samples which were sandwiched between Ag paste deposited
electrodes, in parallel plate geometry. We used an Agilent E4980A
LCR Meter to measure the dielectric properties and a Radiant Precision
LC Ferroelectric Tester to measure the P-E loops.Piezoresponse
force microscopy was measured on a 6 × 6 μm2 scan area using a DCP-11 diamond coated tip (NT-MDT, Moscow,
Russia) while measuring amplitude and phase (R and
θ). It was undertaken on a Park XE-100 (Park Systems, Suwon,
South Korea) with a SR830 lock in amplifier (Stanford Research, CA,
USA) with a bias voltage of 5 V, a time constant of 1 ms, and a sensitivity
of 100 μV).All DFT calculations have been performed using
the CRYSTAL09 program.[30] We employed the
PBE0 hybrid exchange functional
that uses 25% Hartree–Fock exchange; reciprocal space sampling
has been performed for all structures using a Monkhorst-Pack grid
of 8 × 8 × 8 k-points for all structures. Standard all electron
basis sets from the CRYSTAL online database (www.crystal.unito.it) have been used for all elements (indicated by the following labels
online: Fe_86–411d41G_towler_1992a, Sc_864–11dG*_harrison_2006,
O_8–411d11G_valenzano_2006). Full geometry optimizations have
been performed for each structure, followed by a series of constant
volume optimizations to evaluate the phase diagrams. Enthalpies have
been derived from the energy-volume data, by fitting to the second
order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state.Monte Carlo
simulations have been performed using an extended Ising
model with coupling parameters fitted to a test set of different disordered
structures. Sampling has been performed on cells containing 5184 ion
pairs. For each temperature, 10000 sampling points, separated by 4
times the correlation length of the simulation, have been used.
Results and Discussion
Reaction of Sc2O3 with Fe2O3 at 1500 °C for 12 h
in air at ambient pressure yields
a material adopting the bixbyite structure of Sc2O3 (Figure 1a and Supporting Information Figure S1) which shows weak ferromagnetism
with a Tc of 39 K[31−33] (Figure S2). The bixbyite-type ScFeO3 is an anion vacancy-ordered derivative of fluorite with a disordered
distribution of Sc3+ and Fe3+. This type of
structure is a clear candidate for transition to a denser close-packed
structure under high pressure by elimination of anion vacancies. Indeed,
it has been previously demonstrated that several bixbyite systems
convert to corundum type phases at high pressure and temperature.[34,35] Reaction of stoichiometric mixtures of Sc2O3 and Fe2O3 at 6 GPa and 1500 °C afforded
a material (HP SFO) with a unit cell corresponding to the corundum
structure (a = 5.198(1) Å, c = 14.003(1) Å) adopted by α-Fe2O3 (Figure 1b); this hexagonal close-packed
structure has 2/3 of the octahedral voids filled
by metal cations, which can be considered as dimers of face-sharing
MO6 octahedra along the [001] direction of stacking of
the close-packed oxide layers, linked by corner-sharing into a three-dimensional
framework. Synthesis of the bulk material away from the 1:1 composition
in Sc1–Fe1+O3 (nonstoichiometric Sc1.024Fe0.976O3 (Sc-rich) and Sc0.976Fe1.024O3 (Fe-rich) were prepared under the same conditions as ScFeO3) does change the unit cell dimensions of the corundum–like
phase, but it produces Sc2O3 and Fe2O3 impurities even at minor deviations from the fully
stoichiometric structure (Figure 2a). The absence
of an extensive solid solution in SFO, in contrast to In2O3–Fe2O3 and Ga2O3–Fe2O3[34] is unexpected given the similar size (0.745 and 0.645 Å,
respectively[36]) and identical charge of
Sc3+ and Fe3+, and this indicates the likely
presence of short-range ordered structural motifs in SFO (as discussed
later).
Figure 1
(a) Sc2O3 (bixbyite, Ia3̅) viewed
along [100]; (b) α-Fe2O3 (corundum, R3̅c) structure,
viewed along [110].
Figure 2
(a) Room temperature XRD patterns for Sc1–Fe1+O3 (x = 0, ±0.024). Diamonds represent peaks for corundum impurities and dots bixbyite. (b)
Room temperature XRD patterns for ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.50, and 1). The resulting phases
for each composition are marked on the right side, where S stands
for a high pressure ScFeO3-type phase and G for a GdFeO3-type phase.
(a) Room temperature XRD patterns for Sc1–Fe1+O3 (x = 0, ±0.024). Diamonds represent peaks for corundum impurities and dots bixbyite. (b)
Room temperature XRD patterns for ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.50, and 1). The resulting phases
for each composition are marked on the right side, where S stands
for a high pressure ScFeO3-type phase and G for a GdFeO3-type phase.Characterization data for thin films of ScFeO3 grown
on SrTiO3 (100) substrates. The epitaxial relationship
of the film to substrate was [2-21]SFO (cor)||[001]STO and (012)SFO (cor)|| (010)STO. (a)
out-of-plane X-ray diffraction scan indexed to the perovskite pseudocubic
cell (gray italic indices indicate a reflection from the substrate)
with lattice vector relations of [0 0 1]per ∥ [2
−2 1]corand (0 1 0)per ∥(0 1 2)cor. (b) Reciprocal space map about the (0–33) reflection
of the substrate showing coherent alignment of Fe2O3 (FO) with ScFeO3 (0 3 −12)SFO (cor)∥ (1 3 10)FO The ScFeO3 peak is indexed
to the perovskite pseudocubic cell. The breadth of the film peak is
assigned to strain gradients moving away from the substrate and the
domain structure within the film. (c) High resolution HAADF-STEM image
of the substrate film interface, the white arrow indicates a boundary
between two twin domains. This twinning is due to the rhombohedral
distortion having four possible orientations when growing on the cubic
SrTiO3 surface. (d) Schematic indicating the registry of
the ScFeO3 thin films (top) to the SrTiO3 substrate (bottom). The perovskite pseudocubic
cell is indicated and its relationship to the corundum cell. For clarity,
the Sc and Fe site are shown disordered with the Sc octahedra removed.
Perovskite cell highlighted with respect to the substrate (e) and
orientation of the rhombohedral cell with respect to the perovskite
cell. In the Figure the out-of-plane lattice parameter is that determined
experimentally and the in-plane is set equal to SrTiO3 with
γ = 90° rather than the bulk rhombohedral angle. The experimentally
determined γ = 89.2°.ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03,
0.10, 0.15, 0.20,
0.50, 1) solid solutions were also investigated with ScCrO3, which adopts the distorted perovskite GdFeO3 structure
at high pressure[17] (Figure 2b) The HP SFO corundum-like structure was retained for x ≤ 0.10 (reacted at 1500 °C (x = 0), 1480 °C (x = 0.03), and 1450 °C
(x = 0.10)). The HP SFO and GdFeO3-type
structures coexist for x = 0.15 and 0.2. At x ≥ 0.50, only the GdFeO3-type phase was
formed. For x = 0, the material starts to decompose
on heating; at about 200 °C, the peaks begin to broaden; and
by 500 °C, the material has decomposed into Sc2O3 and Fe2O3 (Figure
S3). Both x = 0.03 (Supporting
Information Figure S4) and x = 0.10 (Figure S5) are significantly more robust, not
decomposing below 800 °C.SFO thin films (∼25 nm
thick) were grown on SrTiO3 (001) substrates using pulsed
laser deposition (PLD, 850 °C
deposition temperature, oxygen partial pressure of 2 mTorr) with an
SrRuO3 buffer layer (typically 3–5 unit cell monolayers)
through substrate-imposed strain engineering[37] (Figure S6). The lattice mismatch of
2.7% between the pseudocubic perovskite cell of corundum ScFeO3 (ap = 3.802 Å, α =
86.2°; Figure 3d and e) and (001) SrTiO3 is less than that for the ambient pressure bixbyite structure
(14.7% in the 45° cube on cube configuration). The observed 3.806
Å out-of-plane lattice parameter (Figure 3a) is consistent with the high-pressure synthesized bulk material.
Figure 3
Characterization data for thin films of ScFeO3 grown
on SrTiO3 (100) substrates. The epitaxial relationship
of the film to substrate was [2–21]SFO (cor)||[001]STO and (012)SFO (cor)|| (010)STO. (a)
out-of-plane X-ray diffraction scan indexed to the perovskite pseudocubic
cell (gray italic indices indicate a reflection from the substrate)
with lattice vector relations of [0 0 1]per ∥ [2
−2 1]corand (0 1 0)per ∥(0 1 2)cor. (b) Reciprocal space map about the (0–33) reflection
of the substrate showing coherent alignment of Fe2O3 (FO) with ScFeO3 (0 3 −12)SFO (cor)∥ (1 3 10)FO The ScFeO3 peak is indexed
to the perovskite pseudocubic cell. The breadth of the film peak is
assigned to strain gradients moving away from the substrate and the
domain structure within the film. (c) High resolution HAADF-STEM image
of the substrate film interface, the white arrow indicates a boundary
between two twin domains. This twinning is due to the rhombohedral
distortion having four possible orientations when growing on the cubic
SrTiO3 surface. (d) Schematic indicating the registry of
the ScFeO3 thin films (top) to the SrTiO3 substrate (bottom). The perovskite pseudocubic
cell is indicated and its relationship to the corundum cell. For clarity,
the Sc and Fe site are shown disordered with the Sc octahedra removed.
Perovskite cell highlighted with respect to the substrate (e) and
orientation of the rhombohedral cell with respect to the perovskite
cell. In the Figure the out-of-plane lattice parameter is that determined
experimentally and the in-plane is set equal to SrTiO3 with
γ = 90° rather than the bulk rhombohedral angle. The experimentally
determined γ = 89.2°.
The cell is distorted from the bulk cell due to substrate strain
with α determined (Supporting Information
p S9) as 89.2° at the substrate film interface. Off-axis
reciprocal space maps (RSM) (Figure 3b) reveal
Fe2O3 coherently aligned with ScFeO3, consistent with EDX measurement of the film composition as Sc0.87Fe1.13O3, attributed to incomplete
stoichiometry transfer from the target and consistent with the restricted
compositional variation found in bulk high pressure synthesis. Vertical
twin planes separate the film into columnar domains, originating at
misfit dislocations that relax the epitaxial strain and are present
every 4–10 nm (Figure 3c).The
1:1 stoichiometric ratio of Sc and Fe observed in HP SFO suggests
ordering of these cations within the dimers of face-shared octahedra
of the corundum lattice. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations,
employing the PBE0 hybrid-exchange functional under periodic boundary
conditions, show that structures with only heteronuclear (Sc,Fe) dimers
are at least 1.0 eV per dimer more stable than structures with homonuclear
(2Fe or 2Sc) pairs. Homonuclear dimers are thus expected only in very
low concentration, which explains the lack of solid solutions away
from the 1:1 ratio. However, inverting the position of Sc and Fe ions
within a heteronuclear dimer has much smaller energetic cost (Supporting Information Table S2) and is likely
to occur extensively; we will henceforth refer to this defect as the antisite dimer.Ordered decoration of the corundum
lattice with the energetically
favored heteronuclear dimers affords two candidate structures. The
ilmenite structure (Figure 4a, left) arises
when the two cations form alternate layers perpendicular to c (space group R3̅). If instead the
dimers are arranged to avoid octahedral edge-sharing by like cations
(Figure 4a, right), we obtain the LiNbO3 structure with three-dimensional self-connectivity of each
cation (space group R3c). DFT calculations
(Supporting Information pp S11–12) show an energetic preference of 0.13 eV/formula unit (f.u.) for
the R3c variant.
Figure 4
(a) Polyhedral representation
of SFO slabs demonstrating the cation
order in ilmenite (left) and LiNbO3 (right). The black
circle indicates an antisite dimer defect in polar corundum SFO. (b)
[11̅0] zone axis noncentrosymmetric CBED pattern. A mirror plane
and two GjonnesMoodie (GM) lines parallel to it are highlighted which
correspond to the c glide plane. (c) The whole [11̅0]
zone axis CBED pattern showing a mirror plane. The five CBED patterns
shown here and in Supporting Information Figure
S5 are all collected from different crystallites. (d) TEM SAED
along the [11̅0] zone axis—the spots due to double diffraction
are marked by arrows. (e) [241] = ⟨100⟩p zone
axis HAADF-STEM image of ScFeO3. (f) [121̅] = ⟨110⟩p zone axis HAADF-STEM image of ScFeO3. The calculated
images for the ordered and disordered structure models are superimposed.
(a) Polyhedral representation
of SFO slabs demonstrating the cation
order in ilmenite (left) and LiNbO3 (right). The black
circle indicates an antisite dimer defect in polar corundum SFO. (b)
[11̅0] zone axis noncentrosymmetric CBED pattern. A mirror plane
and two GjonnesMoodie (GM) lines parallel to it are highlighted which
correspond to the c glide plane. (c) The whole [11̅0]
zone axis CBED pattern showing a mirror plane. The five CBED patterns
shown here and in Supporting Information Figure
S5 are all collected from different crystallites. (d) TEM SAED
along the [11̅0] zone axis—the spots due to double diffraction
are marked by arrows. (e) [241] = ⟨100⟩p zone
axis HAADF-STEM image of ScFeO3. (f) [121̅] = ⟨110⟩p zone axis HAADF-STEM image of ScFeO3. The calculated
images for the ordered and disordered structure models are superimposed.Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) allows
unique determination
of point groups and was thus applied to determine the presence or
absence of an inversion center.[38] CBED
on bulk ScFeO3 revealed the noncentrosymmetric 3m point group and the presence of c-glide
planes in the structure (Figure 4 and Supporting Information Figure S7)—the
(006) and (006̅) disks in the [11̅0] zone axis CBED pattern
(Figure 4b and c) have different structures,
reflected in other differences between (hkl) and
() disks, demonstrating the
absence of an inversion center. Together with the selected area electron
diffraction data (Figure 4d), the noncentrosymmetric
space group R3c was determined.
The space group and unit cell correspond to those of ferroelectric
LiNbO3 and multiferroic BiFeO3. These can be
described either as cation ordered corundums (see above) or alternatively
as a derivative of perovskite, where a combination of ferroelectric Γ4– (x,x,x shift)
cation displacement from the AO3 close-packed layer and
R4+ (a–a–a–) octahedral tilting leads to
the creation of an octahedral site for the initially 12 coordinate
perovskite A cation.[10,39] The polar nature of ScFeO3 thus suggests some Sc/Fe order in the corundum-like structure.
Assuming a completely cation-ordered LiNbO3-type structure,
one would expect the projected Sc and Fe columns to be imaged as dots
of different brightness on the high angle annular dark field scanning
transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images due to a difference
in the atomic number of Sc (Z = 21) and Fe (Z = 26). However, no noticeable difference in the brightness
of the dots associated with the Sc and Fe columns was observed on
the experimental images (Figure 4e and f),
indicating that the order of Sc and Fe in ScFeO3 is incomplete.The very similar X-ray and neutron scattering factors of Sc3+ and Fe3+ prevent unambiguous assignment of the
ordering extent, based purely on either neutron or nonresonant X-ray
diffraction (qualities of Rietveld fits were insensitive to occupancy).
Therefore, anomalous scattering diffraction data at the
Fe K edge were collected on the I11 instrument at the Diamond Light
Source at six energies near the Fe K absorption edge (Figure 5a). Anomalous scattering experiments exploit the
change in the X-ray scattering power of an element as the X-ray wavelength
moves through the absorption edge,[40] and
they are used here to increase the contrast between Sc and Fe by working
at the Fe K edge. The data were refined to a composition [Sc0.54(2)Fe0.46(2)] [Sc0.46(2)Fe0.54(2)]O3(Figure 5b), confirming that only a
small degree of order is observed (8(2)% defined as the difference
in occupancy), consistent with the polar symmetry observed in CBED,
but lack of observable cation order on the HAADF-STEM images due to
the negligibly small difference of the scattering power at these positions.
These cation site occupancies were then fixed in the refinement of
the neutron and nonresonant synchrotron powder diffraction data. The
refined structure and coordination environments are shown in Figure 5c–e with refined coordinates, bond lengths,
and angles given in Tables 1 and 2 and the cif file provided in the Supporting
Information (where the magnetic moments can be found in the
gsas .lst file). The Sc3+ site is larger (2.104 Å)
than the Fe3+ site (2.067 Å), as might be expected
from simple ionic radii arguments. This is consistent with the DFT-optimized
bond lengths (0 K) of 3 × 2.074 Å, 3 × 2.167 Å
(Sc–O) and 3 × 1.953 Å, 3 × 2.152 Å (Fe–O)
for a fully ordered structure (Supporting Information
Tables S3 and S4). The Sc3+ site is also more distorted
(3.49% vs 3.39%)—the refined bond lengths are thus consistent
with the identified polar order. The magnetic structure is that described
for α-Fe2O3 above the transition Morin
transition.[41] The observed reduced moment
is consistent with the mean field estimate for T/TN = 0.84 of 2.8 μB/Fe3+. The term “polar corundum” is therefore suggested
to reflect the combination of partial cation ordering resulting in
a noncentrosymmetric corundum-type structure. In polar corundum ScFeO3, the distinction between oxygen coordination of the two cation
sites is less pronounced than in LiNbO3 and BiFeO3, favoring incomplete cation order rather than a perovskite-based
description.
Figure 5
(a) Fluorescence intensity versus energy at the Fe K edge
for ScFeO3 on instrument I11 at DLS. The six selected energy
levels
(En = 7.050, 7.080, 7.112, 7.138, 7.165, and 7.190 keV for n = 1–6, respectively) used for diffraction studies
near the Fe K absorption edge were marked by arrows (↓) and
stars (☆). (b) Simultaneous
Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction data for ScFeO3 collected at six selected energy levels near the Fe K absorption
edge, giving a partially ordered composition of [Sc0.54(2)Fe0.46(2)] [Sc0.46(2)Fe0.54(2)]O3. The inset (38.6–39.8°) shows the peak evolution
and changes in diffraction intensity due to the energy variation of
resonant scattering. (c) Rietveld refinement of neutron powder diffraction
data (POLARIS 145° bank) for ScFeO3; black crosses
represent observed data, the red line the calculated fit, the blue
line the difference, upper black tick marks the allowed nuclear Bragg
peaks, and the lower ones the allowed magnetic peaks; the inset shows
longer d-spacing data from the 35° bank of POLARIS.
(d) Polyhedral representation of the final structure viewed along
[110]. Brown polyhedral are 54% Fe, 46% Sc, and purple
polyhedra are 54% Sc, 46% Fe. Arrows represent the refined magnetic
moment orientations. Local coordination environment of (e) the scandium
rich site Sc2 and the iron rich site Fe2 viewed perpendicular to the c axis.
Table 1
Refined Structural Parameters for
Polar Corundum ScFeO3 (R3c, a = 5.202475(4) Å, c = 14.01449(10)
Å, V = 328.4944(25) Å3, χ2 = 1.047, Rwp = 6.1%)a
x
Y
z
100Ui/Ue
M (μB)
Sc1
0
0
0.04769(5)
0.378(5)
Fe1
0
0
0.257903b
0.510(5)
2.72(4)
O1
0.3424(2)
–0.0260 (1)
0.8176(2)
0.482(5)
Fe2
0
0
0.04769(5)
0.378(5)
2.72(4)
Sc2
0
0
0.257903b
0.510(5)
Further details of the refinement
can be found in the cif file. Sc1 and Fe2 are 46% occupied whilst
Sc2 and Fe1 are 54% occupied as determined from the anomalous scattering
experiment.
Fixed to
fix the origin.
Table 2
Refined Bond Lengths for Polar Corundum
ScFeO3
Fe2|Sc1
O1
3×
1.9948(20) Å
O1
3×
2.1391(27) Å
Sc2|Fe1
O1
3×
2.0324(17) Å
O1
3×
2.1752(27) Å
(a) Fluorescence intensity versus energy at the Fe K edge
for ScFeO3 on instrument I11 at DLS. The six selected energy
levels
(En = 7.050, 7.080, 7.112, 7.138, 7.165, and 7.190 keV for n = 1–6, respectively) used for diffraction studies
near the Fe K absorption edge were marked by arrows (↓) and
stars (☆). (b) Simultaneous
Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction data for ScFeO3 collected at six selected energy levels near the Fe K absorption
edge, giving a partially ordered composition of [Sc0.54(2)Fe0.46(2)] [Sc0.46(2)Fe0.54(2)]O3. The inset (38.6–39.8°) shows the peak evolution
and changes in diffraction intensity due to the energy variation of
resonant scattering. (c) Rietveld refinement of neutron powder diffraction
data (POLARIS 145° bank) for ScFeO3; black crosses
represent observed data, the red line the calculated fit, the blue
line the difference, upper black tick marks the allowed nuclear Bragg
peaks, and the lower ones the allowed magnetic peaks; the inset shows
longer d-spacing data from the 35° bank of POLARIS.
(d) Polyhedral representation of the final structure viewed along
[110]. Brown polyhedral are 54% Fe, 46% Sc, and purple
polyhedra are 54% Sc, 46% Fe. Arrows represent the refined magnetic
moment orientations. Local coordination environment of (e) the scandium
rich site Sc2 and the iron rich site Fe2 viewed perpendicular to the c axis.Further details of the refinement
can be found in the cif file. Sc1 and Fe2 are 46% occupied whilst
Sc2 and Fe1 are 54% occupied as determined from the anomalous scattering
experiment.Fixed to
fix the origin.The isolation of polar corundum SFO under high P/T reaction conditions can be understood
by DFT
calculations of the enthalpies of competing structure types (perovskite,
ilmenite, polar corundum, postperovskite (CaIrO3), and
YMnO3) in comparison with a mixture of the binary oxides
at up to 40 GPa (Figure 6). Ferro- (FM) and
antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases have been considered for all structures.
Taking only 0 K effects into account (upper diagram), the polar corundum
structure is predicted not to form a stable phase. Instead, the mixture
of AFMbinary oxides is stable up to 10.5 GPa, when it transforms
into an AFMperovskite, which finally converts into the CaIrO3 postperovskite structure at pressures above 41 GPa. Temperature
effects on the phase stability arise from configurational and magnetic
terms. The enthalpy of the paramagnetic phase is approximated as the
mean of the AFM and FM enthalpies of each polymorph. Configurational
effects are not important for polymorphs where Fe and Sc are in substantially
different environments (perovskite, postperovskite, and YMnO3).
Figure 6
Calculated enthalpies as a function of pressure for ScFeO3 polymorphs: polar corundum (blue), perovskite (black), YMnO3 (purple), ilmenite (red), and postperovskite (green) relative
to the binary oxides (yellow). Upper plot: 0 K results, for FM (solid
lines) and AFM (dashed lined) phases. Mid plot: 1773 K results, for
the paramagnetic phase, where the blue area represents the contribution
of the configurational entropy to the polar corundum, with the lower
bound shown representing the maximum possible stabilizing contribtion.
Both magnetic and configurational terms are essential for the polar
corundum to become the stable phase between 0 and 12 GPa. Bottom diagram:
temperature dependence of cation order in polar corundum SFO from
MC simulations, showing a transition from a mainly ordered to a mainly
disordered structure between 1300 and 1450 K.
Calculated enthalpies as a function of pressure for ScFeO3 polymorphs: polar corundum (blue), perovskite (black), YMnO3 (purple), ilmenite (red), and postperovskite (green) relative
to the binary oxides (yellow). Upper plot: 0 K results, for FM (solid
lines) and AFM (dashed lined) phases. Mid plot: 1773 K results, for
the paramagnetic phase, where the blue area represents the contribution
of the configurational entropy to the polar corundum, with the lower
bound shown representing the maximum possible stabilizing contribtion.
Both magnetic and configurational terms are essential for the polar
corundum to become the stable phase between 0 and 12 GPa. Bottom diagram:
temperature dependence of cation order in polar corundum SFO from
MC simulations, showing a transition from a mainly ordered to a mainly
disordered structure between 1300 and 1450 K.For ilmenite and polar corundum, the results above
show that antisite
disorder is important. A first order approximation of the entropy
can be obtained by describing the material as a solid solution AB(1–O3 of the Fe–Sc dimers, where A and B correspond
to the two possible orientations of each dimer. This entropy leads
to a stabilization of 0.105 eV/f.u. at 1773 K for ilmenite and polar
corundum. Taking configurational and magnetic terms into account stabilizes
the polar corundum structure at modest pressures with respect to the
binary oxides (Figure 6).Antisite disorder
in the polar corundum structure has been quantified
by a series of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Interaction parameters
are based on an extended Ising model and have been chosen to reproduce
the relative energy of different magnetic phases and antisite defects
from the DFT calculations (reported in Supporting
Information Table S2). The temperature dependence of antisite
disorder with respect to the R3c structure (Figure 6) shows a sharp drop in
cation order from 0.82 to 0.54 between 1300 and 1450 K. At the synthesis
temperature, the MC model predicts the material to be paramagnetic
(neither short nor long-range magnetic order remains appreciable in
the magnetic RDF) and gives a composition of [Sc0.515Fe0.485][Sc0.485Fe0.515]O3,
in good agreement with experiment. This indicates that increased cation
order can be obtained by annealing the material below 1300 K, but
the reduced configurational entropy under these conditions provides
insufficient stabilization of the polar corundum structure with respect
to the binary oxides.Having ascertained the structural details
of SFO as a polar partially
disordered phase compatible with ferroic behavior, we measured its
functional response to applied electric and magnetic fields. The polarization
of the ideal crystal structure was computed using a Wannier function
approach. The same inversion mechanism was found as in LiNbO3[42] via a migration of an octahedral ion
through the face of the octahedron perpendicular to the c-axis (barriers are discussed in Supporting Information Figures S11 and S12). For the fully ordered R3c ScFeO3 structure, the polarization was computed
as 3.3 μC cm–2. This small value originates
from the relative polarity of Fe–O and Sc–O bonds and
the difference in the off-center displacements of Sc3+ and
Fe3+, where Fe3+ is more able than most magnetic
transition metal cations to tolerate irregular environments due to
its spherically symmetric d5 high spin (HS) configuration.
The ionic contribution to the polarization was calculated as 4.0 μC
cm–2 with a formal point charge model at the geometry
found in the DFT calculations using the program PSEUDO.[43] Experimental measurements made use of piezoresponse
force microscopy (PFM).[44,45] The combination of
a high level of structural disorder and small polarization even within
a fully ordered ScFeO3 makes PFM observation of polar domains
difficult, and in general, no response was observed. In some regions
of the ceramic, however, clear 180° domains were seen in the
PFM phase image (Figure 7, Figure S11), showing equal amplitude domains separated by
a zero amplitude domain wall. The small effective d33 of
∼0.1 pm V–1 in the ceramic (estimated from
a comparison with periodically poled LiNbO3) reinforces
the difficulty of observing the polar domains. PFM spectroscopy was
performed on a thin film sample where the PFM amplitude was measured
as a function of the ac voltage applied at a single point. The response
is ∼5 pm V–1 and is linear, as would be expected
from a piezoelectric material, as opposed to a quadratic response
characteristic of electrostriction that occurs in all materials.
Figure 7
Piezoresponse
force microscopy of ScFeO3. (a) Topography.
(b) Vertical PFM phase. (c) Point spectroscopy of the vertical piezoresponse
amplitude as a function of ac drive amplitude. (d) Vertical PFM amplitude.
PFM images a,b, and d were measured on a ceramic sample;
PFM spectroscopy c was measured on a thin film sample. White circles
highlight two domains of equal amplitude but opposite phase and are
separated by a domain wall of zero amplitude.
Piezoresponse
force microscopy of ScFeO3. (a) Topography.
(b) Vertical PFM phase. (c) Point spectroscopy of the vertical piezoresponse
amplitude as a function of ac drive amplitude. (d) Vertical PFM amplitude.
PFM images a,b, and d were measured on a ceramic sample;
PFM spectroscopy c was measured on a thin film sample. White circles
highlight two domains of equal amplitude but opposite phase and are
separated by a domain wall of zero amplitude.Polar corundum structured ScFeO3 itself
displays poor
dielectric characteristics with large and frequency-dependent relative
permittivity and loss (Figure S8(a)), together
with “dead short” P(E) behavior.[46] Annealing to reduce the oxygen vacancy content proposed
as the origin of the high loss is not possible due to the decomposition
of SFO. Substitution of Fe3+ by Cr3+ in ScFe1–CrO3 is possible up to x = 0.1 (Figure 2b) and increases the ambient pressure thermal stability,
permitting annealing at 750 °C in oxygen for 6 h (Figure S4). This decreases the dielectric loss
significantly (tan δ < 0.1 at 1 kHz), and the (relative)
dielectric permittivity attains a frequency-independent high frequency
limit of 60 above 1 kHz (Figure 8b), within
the range reported for BiFeO3[10,47,48]—this value is suggested to be intrinsic. The
divergence of the dielectric constant and dielectric loss at low frequency
is ascribed to hopping conductivity,[49] which
is also common for BiFeO3.[50,51] Cole–Cole
plots for ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0 and 0.1) are
shown and discussed in the Supporting Information
on page S15. P(E) loops close
at high frequencies, suggesting removal of the influence of extrinsic
charge carriers, but they do not saturate, reaching 1.4 μC/cm2 at 50 kV/cm and 100 Hz (Figure S9 is consistent with alignment of the intrinsic polarization without
sufficient field being applied to switch it. Nonsaturated P(E) loops are common in polycrystalline
BiFeO3 and explained in terms of high conductivity or large
coercive fields due to pinned domain walls.[52−55] Ferroelectricity is not demonstrated
by these measurements.)
Figure 8
Frequency dependent dielectric constant and
dielectric loss of
(a) ScFeO3 and (b) ScFe0.9Cr0.1O3.
Frequency dependent dielectric constant and
dielectric loss of
(a) ScFeO3 and (b) ScFe0.9Cr0.1O3.Neutron powder diffraction (NPD) shows that polar
corundum ScFeO3 is magnetically ordered at 300 K, adopting
a G-type antiferromagnetic
(AFM) structure with antiparallel spins for all nearest neighbors:
the observed moment orientation within the close-packed layers is
the same as that found in the high temperature phase of α-Fe2O3: this orientation permits a weak ferromagnetic
(WFM) canting.[56] Alternating current susceptibility
measurements on ScFeO3 in a 5 Oe magnetic field reveal
a cusp at 356 K consistent with the onset of antiferromagnetic order
(Figure 9; for Cr doped samples, see Figure 10 and Table 3). Below this
temperature, the FC and ZFC DC magnetization data measured at 1000
Oe diverge, and hysteresis is observed in M(H) loops (Ms reaching 0.0106 μB/formula unit at
5 K—this small moment canting would not be directly detectable
in the NPD measurement), consistent with weak ferromagnetism occurring
simultaneously with the antiferromagnetic order. Similar ordering
temperatures and magnetization values were obtained in three distinct
samples. The bulk nature of the antiferromagnetic order and coupled
WFM is proved by Mössbauer spectroscopy (Figure 9c), which reveals TN = 360 ±
5 K, consistent with the magnetization data. Mössbauer spectroscopy
is a local probe of the magnetic field sensed by each iron nucleus
and is thus the technique of choice to avoid confusion by small quantities
of highly magnetic impurities, which is a potential problem with bulk
magnetization measurements used in isolation. The isomer shift indicates
Fe3+, and the observation of a quadrupole splitting is
consistent with the observed distorted octahedral environment. The
absence of a center of symmetry on the Fe–O–Fe exchange
path allows weak ferromagnetism via the Dzialoshinskii–Moriya
interaction. The antisite defects create local FM moments associated
with the ilmenite-like environment.
Figure 9
Magnetic behavior of high pressure ScFeO3. (a) Temperature
dependence of the ZFC and FC dc susceptibility measured at 1000 Oe,
and the real part of the ac susceptibility measured at 5 Oe. (b) Temperature
dependence of the saturation magnetization, extracted from the M–H
curves, by extrapolating the high-field magnetization. The inset shows
a magnified version of 5 and 300 K M(H) data; M(H) measurements at
other temperatures, used to construct the Msat vs T plot, are given in Figure
S8. (c) Mössbauer spectra recorded at four different
temperatures. The green and red subspectra at 350 K represent fits
to the ordered and nonordered components, respectively, while the
solid lines are guides to the eye.
Figure 10
(a) Temperature dependence of the ZFC and FC dc magnetic
susceptibility
of ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, and 0.10), measured
at 1000 Oe. Open and closed symbols represent ZFC and FC data, respectively.
(b) Temperature dependence of the real part of the ac susceptibility
of ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, and 0.10), measured
at 5 Oe.
Table 3
Change of Ordering Temperature in
ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, and 0.10)
composition
TN (K)
ScFeO3
356
ScFe0.97Cr0.03O3
340
ScFe0.9Cr0.1O3
336
Magnetic behavior of high pressure ScFeO3. (a) Temperature
dependence of the ZFC and FC dc susceptibility measured at 1000 Oe,
and the real part of the ac susceptibility measured at 5 Oe. (b) Temperature
dependence of the saturation magnetization, extracted from the M–H
curves, by extrapolating the high-field magnetization. The inset shows
a magnified version of 5 and 300 K M(H) data; M(H) measurements at
other temperatures, used to construct the Msat vs T plot, are given in Figure
S8. (c) Mössbauer spectra recorded at four different
temperatures. The green and red subspectra at 350 K represent fits
to the ordered and nonordered components, respectively, while the
solid lines are guides to the eye.(a) Temperature dependence of the ZFC and FC dc magnetic
susceptibility
of ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, and 0.10), measured
at 1000 Oe. Open and closed symbols represent ZFC and FC data, respectively.
(b) Temperature dependence of the real part of the ac susceptibility
of ScFe1–CrO3 (x = 0, 0.03, and 0.10), measured
at 5 Oe.The simultaneous appearance of WFM with the main AFM
order (Figure 9) confirms that WFM is an intrinsic
property of
SFO. The ordering temperature is an order of magnitude higher than
that found in the bixbyite polymorph of ScFeO3 because
of the more favorable Fe–O–Fe angles that allow the
extremely strong d5–d5 AFM superexchange
to operate. The dilution of Fe3+ with nonmagnetic Sc3+ reduces the magnetic ordering temperature from 948 K in
the nonpolar R3̅c corundum
α-Fe2O3 to ∼360 K in ScFeO3, but the strength of the exchange interaction and retention
of the 3D network of Fe3+ connectivity in the polar corundum
still places the ordering above room temperature. Unlike the case
of α-Fe2O3 (where canting disappears below
the 260 K Morin spin reorientation transition due to changes in the
anisotropy aligning the moments along the c-axis),
WFM in SFO persists to 5 K. The Cr3+-doped compounds on
which the permittivity measurements were performed display WFM order
above room temperature with coupled TN and Tc demonstrated by ac and dc magnetization
measurements, with both Ms (judged by
the low T temperature invariant FC magnetization)
and TN decreasing as the Cr3+ content increases (Figure 10, Table 3).
Conclusions
Corundum is an archetypal oxide structure,
and the observation
of a polar variant in SFO is unexpected. CBED unambiguously demonstrates
the polar nature of high pressure ScFeO3, accounted for
by partial Sc/Fe order over the two distinct octahedral cation sites.
The extent of the cation site order observed is quantitatively consistent
with DFT calculations of antisite dimer defect creation enthalpies.
The absence of extensive solid solution in both bulk and thin film
is consistent with each dimer containing one Sc and one Fe—the
small degree of ordering can then be assigned to disorder in the orientation
of these dimers—which agrees with the high energy of homoatomic
occupation of the face-sharing octahedral dimers in DFT calculations.
The resulting heteroatomic dimers have two possible polar orientations,
so the observed antisite disorder entropically stabilizes the polar
corundum structure and is intrinsic to its formation. The combination
of high pressure (to eliminate vacancies in the bixbyite structure
where face-sharing octahedra are absent) and high temperature (to
generate sufficient though not complete antisite disorder) is thus
required to stabilize the polar corundum structure. In contrast to
the high pressure LiNbO3 polymorph of FeTiO3[12] and both ordered and corrundum type
(In1–M)MO3 (M = Fe1/2Mn1/2; x = 0.143),[14,15] weak ferromagnetism persists
above room temperature and polar distortions are maintained at high
levels of disorder. The calculated theoretical electrical polarization
value is smaller than that of BiFeO3 (60 μC/cm2)[52] while it is 3 orders of magnitude
larger than those of multiferroics where a spin spiral breaks the
inversion symmetry.[1,4,5] The
observed Ms at 5 K (0.01 μB/f.u.) is of the same magnitude (0.008 μB/f.u) as
the Ms measured for high pressure FeTiO3 at 100 K.[12]The difference
in polarity of the Sc–O and Fe–O bonds,
and between Sc3+ and Fe3+ off-center displacements,
thus creates the observed polarization, assigned to the different
bonding preferences of d0 Sc3+ and d5 Fe3+. The Fe3+ 3d5 electrons are
connected three-dimensionally in the polar corundum, resulting in
magnetic order above room temperature. Calculations show antisite
defects to have FM nature, and as in α-Fe2O3 the absence of an inversion center in the Fe–O–Fe
superexchange pathway allows weak ferromagnetism to occur simultaneously
with the antiferromagnetic long-range order. Unlike corundum-structured
α-Fe2O3, weak ferromagnetism in polar
corundum ScFeO3 persists to 5 K, consistent with different
local environments of the Fe3+ moments in the two materials.
Polar corundum is thus a platform for the wide-temperature coexistence
of polarity and ferromagnetism, as, in contrast to other mechanisms
for combining polarity and permanent magnetization above room temperature,[8,9] it does not rely on symmetry breaking associated with magnetic order,
resulting in a polar distortion detectable by both structural and
functional (piezoresponse force microscopy) measurements. Further
modification of the polar corundum structure based on SFO is required
to permit switching of the polarization.
Authors: June Hyuk Lee; Lei Fang; Eftihia Vlahos; Xianglin Ke; Young Woo Jung; Lena Fitting Kourkoutis; Jong-Woo Kim; Philip J Ryan; Tassilo Heeg; Martin Roeckerath; Veronica Goian; Margitta Bernhagen; Reinhard Uecker; P Chris Hammel; Karin M Rabe; Stanislav Kamba; Jürgen Schubert; John W Freeland; David A Muller; Craig J Fennie; Peter Schiffer; Venkatraman Gopalan; Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin; Darrell G Schlom Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: T Varga; A Kumar; E Vlahos; S Denev; M Park; S Hong; T Sanehira; Y Wang; C J Fennie; S K Streiffer; X Ke; P Schiffer; V Gopalan; J F Mitchell Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2009-07-24 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Elizabeth Castillo-Martínez; Mario Bieringer; Shahid P Shafi; Lachlan M D Cranswick; Miguel Ángel Alario-Franco Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: J T Heron; J L Bosse; Q He; Y Gao; M Trassin; L Ye; J D Clarkson; C Wang; Jian Liu; S Salahuddin; D C Ralph; D G Schlom; J Iñiguez; B D Huey; R Ramesh Journal: Nature Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Julia A Mundy; Charles M Brooks; Megan E Holtz; Jarrett A Moyer; Hena Das; Alejandro F Rébola; John T Heron; James D Clarkson; Steven M Disseler; Zhiqi Liu; Alan Farhan; Rainer Held; Robert Hovden; Elliot Padgett; Qingyun Mao; Hanjong Paik; Rajiv Misra; Lena F Kourkoutis; Elke Arenholz; Andreas Scholl; Julie A Borchers; William D Ratcliff; Ramamoorthy Ramesh; Craig J Fennie; Peter Schiffer; David A Muller; Darrell G Schlom Journal: Nature Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Man-Rong Li; Emma E McCabe; Peter W Stephens; Mark Croft; Liam Collins; Sergei V Kalinin; Zheng Deng; Maria Retuerto; Arnab Sen Gupta; Haricharan Padmanabhan; Venkatraman Gopalan; Christoph P Grams; Joachim Hemberger; Fabio Orlandi; Pascal Manuel; Wen-Min Li; Chang-Qing Jin; David Walker; Martha Greenblatt Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Wei Yi; Igor A Presniakov; Alexey V Sobolev; Yana S Glazkova; Yoshitaka Matsushita; Masahiko Tanaka; Kosuke Kosuda; Yoshihiro Tsujimoto; Kazunari Yamaura; Alexei A Belik Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 8.090