| Literature DB >> 27877762 |
Wei Yi, Igor A Presniakov1, Alexey V Sobolev1, Yana S Glazkova1, Yoshitaka Matsushita, Masahiko Tanaka2, Kosuke Kosuda3, Yoshihiro Tsujimoto4, Kazunari Yamaura5, Alexei A Belik6.
Abstract
We synthesize ScCoO3 perovskite and its solid solutions, ScCo1-x Fe x O3 and ScCo1-x Cr x O3, under high pressure (6 GPa) and high temperature (1570 K) conditions. We find noticeable shifts from the stoichiometric compositions, expressed as (Sc1-xMx )MO3 with x = 0.05-0.11 and M = Co, (Co, Fe) and (Co, Cr). The crystal structure of (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 is refined using synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction data: space group Pnma (No. 62), Z = 4 and lattice parameters a = 5.26766(1) Å, b = 7.14027(2) Å and c = 4.92231(1) Å. (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 crystallizes in the GdFeO3-type structure similar to other members of the perovskite cobaltite family, ACoO3 (A3+ = Y and Pr-Lu). There is evidence that (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 has non-magnetic low-spin Co3+ ions at the B site and paramagnetic high-spin Co3+ ions at the A site. In the iron-doped samples (Sc1-xMx )MO3 with M = (Co, Fe), Fe3+ ions have a strong preference to occupy the A site of such perovskites at small doping levels.Entities:
Keywords: cobaltites; high-pressure; low-spin Co3+ ions; perovskites
Year: 2015 PMID: 27877762 PMCID: PMC5036463 DOI: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/2/024801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Figure 1.(a) A portion of the experimental synchrotron XRPD pattern of ScCoO3. The bars show possible Bragg reflection positions for the perovskite phase and Sc2O3 impurity (from top to bottom); hkl indexes for some reflections are given. A star marks a reflection from Au (a contamination from an Au capsule). (b) Portions of experimental (black crosses), calculated (red line) and difference (black line) synchrotron XRPD patterns for (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3. The bars show possible Bragg reflection positions for the perovskite phase.
Structure parameters of (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 and (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 (M = Co0.75Cr0.25) at room temperature.
| Site | Wyckoff position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 | |||||
| Sc/Co | 4 | 0.07704(8) | 0.25 | 0.97603(12) | 0.333(9) |
| Co | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.158(7) |
| O1 | 4 | 0.4468(3) | 0.25 | 0.1313(3) | 0.16(3) |
| O2 | 8 | 0.3101(2) | 0.0631(2) | 0.6830(2) | 0.22(2) |
| (Sc0.95 | |||||
| Sc/ | 4 | 0.07621(8) | 0.25 | 0.97673(14) | 0.511(11) |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.311(8) | |
| O1 | 4 | 0.4465(3) | 0.25 | 0.1307(3) | 0.20(4) |
| O2 | 8 | 0.3101(3) | 0.06395(18) | 0.6838(3) | 0.35(3) |
The occupation factor of all sites is unity. Statistical distribution according to the compositions was assumed for the Sc/Co, Sc/M and M sites.
Space group Pnma (No 62); Z = 4.
(Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3: a = 5.26766(1) Å, b = 7.14027(2) Å, c = 4.92231(1) Å, and V = 185.141(1) Å3; Rwp = 3.72%, Rp = 2.43%, RB = 2.08%, and RF = 1.44%; ρcal = 5.474 g cm−3.
(Sc0.95M0.05)MO3: a = 5.29435(1) Å, b = 7.20430(2) Å, c = 4.95170(1) Å, and V = 188.868(1) Å3; Rwp = 3.04%, Rp = 2.17%, RB = 3.83%, and RF = 2.85%; ρcal = 5.296 g cm−3.
Selected bond lengths, l (Å) < 3.0 Å, bond angles (deg) and bond valence sums (BVS) in (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 and (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 (M = Co0.75Cr0.25).
| (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 | (Sc0.95 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sc—O1 | 2.051(2) | Sc—O1 | 2.061(2) |
| Sc—O2 | 2.091(1) × 2 | Sc—O2 | 2.101(1) × 2 |
| Sc—O1 | 2.093(2) | Sc—O1 | 2.104(2) |
| Sc—O2 | 2.317(1) × 2 | Sc—O2 | 2.331(1) × 2 |
| Sc—O2 | 2.528(1) × 2 | Sc—O2 | 2.555(1) × 2 |
| BVS(Sc3+) | 3.02 | BVS(Sc3+) | 2.92 |
| Co—O2 | 1.908(1) × 2 | 1.917(1) × 2 | |
| Co—O2 | 1.919(1) × 2 | 1.933(1) × 2 | |
| Co—O1 | 1.919(1) × 2 | 1.935(1) × 2 | |
| BVS(Co3+) | 3.35 | BVS(Co3+) | 3.24 |
| Co—O1—Co | 136.93(5) | 137.16(5) | |
| Co—O2—Co | 140.79(5) × 2 | 140.61(5) × 2 | |
BVS = ν = exp[(R0—l)/B], N is the coordination number, B = 0.37, R0(Sc3+) = 1.849, and R0(Co3+) = 1.70 [20].
Figure 2.57Fe Mössbauer spectra at 300 K and fitting results for (a) (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 ( and (b) (Sc0.89M0.11)MO3 (M = Co0.6Fe0.4). The difference between the experimental and calculated spectra is shown at the bottom. (c) Distribution functions p(ΔFe1) of the quadrupole splitting ΔFe1 for the Fe1 subspectrum in (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 ( (green crosses) and (Sc0.89M0.11)MO3 (M = Co0.6Fe0.4) (red squares).
Hyperfine parameters of the 57Fe Mössbauer spectra of (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 ( and (Sc0.89M0.11)MO3 (M = Co0.6Fe0.4) at 300 K.
| Sample | Sites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Sc0.95 | Fe1 | 0.32(1) | 0.42(1) | 0.31(2) | 69(1) |
| ( | Fe2 | 0.45(2) | 1.26(2) | 0.34(1) | 31(2) |
| (Sc0.89 | Fe1 | 0.33(2) | 0.55(3) | 0.25(2) | 88(2) |
| ( | Fe2 | 0.43(2) | 1.30(2) | 0.28(1) | 12(2) |
These are the average 〈δFe1〉 and 〈ΔFe1〉 values obtained from the distribution functions p(δFe1) and p(ΔFe1).
δ is an isomer shift, Δ is quadrupole splitting, W is linewidth, and I is a relative intensity.
Figure 3.ZFC (filled symbols) and FCC (empty symbols) uncorrected magnetic susceptibility (χ = M/H) curves at 100 Oe and 70 kOe for (a) (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 and (b) (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 ( The right-hand axes give inverse FCC curves (χ−1 versus T) at 70 kOe. Parameters (μeff and θ) of the Curie–Weiss fits (bold lines) between 300 and 400 K are given. The thin lines show the same FCC χ−1 versus T curves at 70 kOe corrected for contributions from diamagnetic sample holders and core diamagnetism.
Figure 4.(a) Uncorrected M versus H curves of (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 at 2 K and 300 K (symbols with the line). The line shows the Brillouin function with g = 2 and S = 2 at 2 K, multiplied by 0.028. (b) M versus H curves of (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 ( at 2 K and 300 K (symbols with the line). The line shows the Brillouin function with g = 2 and S = 5/2 at 2 K, multiplied by 0.036. Broken lines show M versus H curves corrected for diamagnetic sample holders and core diamagnetism.
Figure 5.Specific heat data of (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 (powder was washed from KCl and then pressed into pellets at 3 GPa) at a zero magnetic field (white circles) and 90 kOe (blue diamonds) plotted as Cp/T versus T. The inset shows the details below 40 K; the red line is the fit with the equation Cp/T = γ + β1T2 between 9 and 31 K.
Figure 6.Schematic presentations of the energy diagrams for the Co3+ ion in the idealized A site with the D4 symmetry and in the idealized B site with the O symmetry in (Sc0.95Co0.05)CoO3 (where α0 and α4 are radial integrals, JH is the intra-atomic Hund energy).
Figure 7.Portions of XRPD patterns of samples with the total composition of Sc0.9Co1−FeO2.85 with x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8. The bars show possible Bragg reflection positions for the perovskite phase and Sc2O3 impurity (from top to bottom) on a–c. A star marks a reflection from KCl in unwashed samples. On d, the bars show possible Bragg reflection positions for the perovskite phase and ScFeO3 impurity (from top to bottom).
Figure 8.Lattice parameters versus the composition for Sc0.9Co1− CrO2.85 (x = 0, 0.25 and 0.5) and ScCrO3 [36] (empty symbols) and Sc0.9Co1−FeO2.85 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) (filled symbols).
Figure 9.Uncorrected inverse FCC magnetic susceptibility curves (χ−1 versus T) of (Sc0.95M0.05)MO3 (M = Co1−Cr with x = 0.25 and 0.5) at 100 Oe and 10 kOe. Parameters (μeff and θ) of the Curie–Weiss fits (lines) are given.