Literature DB >> 22276541

Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.

Kasey D Fowler-Finn1, Rafael L Rodríguez.   

Abstract

An individual's prior experience of sexual signals can result in variation in mate preferences, with important consequences for the course of sexual selection. We test two hypotheses about the evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance and mismating avoidance. We exposed female Enchenopa binotata treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) to treatments that varied their experience of signal frequency, the most divergent sexual signal trait in the E. binotata species complex. Treatments consisted of (1) signals matching the preferred frequency, (2-3) signals deviating either 100 Hz above or 100 Hz below the preferred frequency, and (4) no signals. Females experiencing preferred signals showed the greatest selectivity. However, experience had no effect on peak preference. These results support the hypothesis that selection has favored plasticity in mate preferences that ensures that mating takes place when preferred mates are rare or absent, while ensuring choice of preferred types when those are present. We consider how experience-mediated plasticity may influence selection on sexual advertisement signals, patterns of reproductive isolation, and the maintenance of genetic variation. We suggest that the plasticity we describe may increase the likelihood of successful colonization of a novel environment, where preferred mating types may be rare.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22276541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ).

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Contrast influences female attraction to performance-based sexual signals in a songbird.

Authors:  Susan M Lyons; Michaël Beaulieu; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Role of sexual imprinting in assortative mating and premating isolation in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Divergence in male cricket song and female preference functions in three allopatric sister species.

Authors:  Ralf Matthias Hennig; Thomas Blankers; David A Gray
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity.

Authors:  Judy A Stamps; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Janette W Boughman; David A Gray; Eileen A Hebets; Gerlinde Höbel; Laurel B Symes
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Joseph T Kilmer; Allysa C Hallett; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Flexible mate choice when mates are rare and time is short.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Emily G Weigel; Megan Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.