Literature DB >> 25319818

Contrast influences female attraction to performance-based sexual signals in a songbird.

Susan M Lyons1, Michaël Beaulieu2, Keith W Sockman3.   

Abstract

Animals do not make decisions in a bubble but often refer to previous experience when discriminating between options. Contrast effects occur when the value of a stimulus affects the response to another value of the stimulus, and the changes in value and response are in the same direction. Although contrast effects appear irrational, they could benefit decision makers when there is spatial or temporal variation and autocorrelation in the value of stimuli that elicit decisions. Here, we examined whether contrasts influence female evaluation of male performance-based sexual signals. We exposed female Lincoln's sparrows (Melospiza lincolnii) to one week of songs that we had experimentally reduced or elevated in performance, followed by a novel song of intermediate performance. We found that high-performance songs were more attractive to females than low-performance songs. Moreover, the intermediate songs were more attractive following exposure to low- than to high-performance songs. These results indicate that contrast can influence evaluation of performance-based sexual stimuli. By examining contrast effects in the ecologically relevant context of mate choice for performance, we can better understand both the adaptive value of comparative evaluation as well as the mechanisms that underlie variation in mate choice and sexual selection.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lincoln's sparrow (Melospiza lincolnii); birdsong; comparative evaluation; contrast effect; mate choice; trill performance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319818      PMCID: PMC4272206          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

1.  An adaptive response to uncertainty generates positive and negative contrast effects.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Tim W Fawcett; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  How do animals choose their mates?

Authors:  R M Gibson; T A Langen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Song in the cold is 'hot': memory of and preference for sexual signals perceived under thermal challenge.

Authors:  Michaël Beaulieu; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  The incentive salience of courtship vocalizations: hormone-mediated 'wanting' in the auditory system.

Authors:  Donna L Maney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Uneven sampling and the analysis of vocal performance constraints.

Authors:  David R Wilson; Pierre-Paul Bitton; Jeffrey Podos; Daniel J Mennill
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  The evolution of decision rules in complex environments.

Authors:  Tim W Fawcett; Benja Fallenstein; Andrew D Higginson; Alasdair I Houston; Dave E W Mallpress; Pete C Trimmer; John M McNamara
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Photorefractoriness in birds and comparison with mammals.

Authors:  T J Nicholls; A R Goldsmith; A Dawson
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Female choice for male motor skills.

Authors:  Julia Barske; Barney A Schlinger; Martin Wikelski; Leonida Fusani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Annual variation in vocal performance and its relationship with bill morphology in Lincoln's sparrows.

Authors:  Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Recent experience modulates forebrain gene-expression in response to mate-choice cues in European starlings.

Authors:  Keith W Sockman; Timothy Q Gentner; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oviposition drives hatching order and developmental disparities with brood mates.

Authors:  Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.703

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.