| Literature DB >> 22275828 |
Jayaganesh V Natarajan1, Marcus Ang, Anastasia Darwitan, Sujay Chattopadhyay, Tina T Wong, Subbu S Venkatraman.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the development and therapeutic evaluation of a liposomal nanocarrier for sustained release of latanoprost, in the rabbit eye.Entities:
Keywords: EggPC; glaucoma; latanoprost; nanoliposomes; nanomedicine; sustained ocular delivery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22275828 PMCID: PMC3260956 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S25468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Size measurement of liposomes during storage at 4°C, 25°C and after drug release in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) at 37°C
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| EggPC liposome | 79.8 (.09) | 114.4 (0.19) | 180.3 (0.34) | 1200 (0.46) | NA | NA |
| Latanoprost loaded EggPC liposomes | 86.6 (0.17) | 83.91 (0.14) | 89.98 (0.14) | 86.38 (0.11) | 82.88 (0.18) | 82.02 (0.08) |
Abbreviations: EggPC, egg-phosphatidylcholine; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PDI, poly dispersity index.
Figure 1In vitro dialysis release study of latanoprost from egg-phosphatidylcholine (EggPC) liposomes obtained after extrusion. Cumulative latanoprost release (%) from EggPC liposomes is plotted against time (days) for a drug/lipid mole ratio of 0.181.
Notes: Each value is plotted as the average of the results obtained from three independent experiments. The standard deviation is plotted as error bars, which is less than 4%.
Figure 2In vitro latanoprost released per day from 100 μL of egg-phosphatidylcholine liposomes with a drug/lipid mole ratio of 0.181 (A) compared with 1 drop of once-daily topical latanoprost (1.5 μg/drop) (B). The amount released per day is reported based on average values of at least two batches and standard deviations are reported in error bars.
Figure 3In vivo intraocular pressure (IOP) recordings (reduction in intraocular pressure compared to baseline) comparing the latanoprost loaded liposome group to the control group (once-daily topical latanoprost). (A) Best-fit line for mean IOP reduction in latanoprost-loaded liposome group. (B) Best-fit line for mean IOP reduction in control group. There were significant differences between the two groups, in intraocular pressure readings throughout the 90-day study period.
Figure 4(A) Injection of subconjunctival liposome formulation. (B) Immediate post-injection of liposome formulation. A subconjunctival bleb is clearly seen where the liposomal formulation has been administered. (C) Slit-lamp photograph of eye post-injection at Day 90. The conjunctiva is white and the eye is quiet. There is no evidence of conjunctival hyperaemia, inflammation, or infection at the site of or surrounding the injection area. (D) Slit-lamp photographs of eye receiving one drop of topical latanoprost daily at Day 90.
Figure 5Anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirming the subconjunctival location of the liposome formulation immediate post-injection (A) and no evidence of scleral thinning or conjunctival scarring at Day 90 (B).