Literature DB >> 22275687

Limit-push training reduces motor variability.

Ian Sharp1, James L Patton.   

Abstract

Variability in human motor control has been a long observed phenomenon, which has come to be known by some as repetition without repetition. There are several explanations for this. One such explanation asserts that many equally optimal solutions exist for accomplishing the same task that naturally allows choices in how it can be successfully executed. The aim of this study was to determine whether variability could be conditioned within an invisible subspace, using visual and force feedback. We utilized a novel haptic-graphic boundary-oriented environment to condition motor variability. Subjects reduced the variability of their movements, such that action predominated within a subspace determined apriori; while the untreated group did not. These results show encouraging preliminary evidence that neural rehabilitative haptic-graphic interfaces can condition human motor variability. This type of training may benefit neurologically impaired individuals, who exhibit the commonly seen motor deficits of large trial to trial variability, such as victims of stroke and traumatic brain injury.
© 2011 IEEE

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22275687      PMCID: PMC8734942          DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot        ISSN: 1945-7898


  17 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954.

Authors:  P M Fitts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-09

Review 3.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities.

Authors:  R Riener; T Nef; G Colombo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A central source of movement variability.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; Afsheen Afshar; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Regina Harbourne; James Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Charles G Burgar; Peggy C Shor; Matra Majmundar; Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Susan E Fasoli; Hermano I Krebs; Joel Stein; Walter R Frontera; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Medical treatment for stroke prevention.

Authors:  D B Matchar; D C McCrory; H J Barnett; J R Feussner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology.

Authors:  Sibylle B Thies; Phil A Tresadern; Laurence P Kenney; Joel Smith; David Howard; John Y Goulermas; Christine Smith; Julie Rigby
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Voluntary reduction of force variability via modulation of low-frequency oscillations.

Authors:  Seoung Hoon Park; Agostina Casamento-Moran; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual Limit-Push Training Alters Movement Variability.

Authors:  Eyad Hajissa; Amit Shah; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Effects of robot viscous forces on arm movements in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Yazan Abdel Majeed; Saria Awadalla; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Reshaping Movement Distributions With Limit-Push Robotic Training.

Authors:  Amit K Shah; Ian Sharp; Eyad Hajissa; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.802

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.