Katherine A Moon1,2, Ana M Rule1, Hoda S Magid1, Jacqueline M Ferguson1, Jolie Susan1, Zhuolu Sun1, Christine Torrey1, Salahaddin Abubaker1, Vladimir Levshin3, Asli Çarkoglu4, Ghada Nasr Radwan5, Maha El-Rabbat4,5, Joanna E Cohen6, Paul Strickland1, Patrick N Breysse1, Ana Navas-Acien1,2,7. 1. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation. 4. Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. 6. Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 7. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.
Abstract
Background: Most smoke-free legislation to reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure exempts waterpipe (hookah) smoking venues. Few studies have examined SHS exposure in waterpipe venues and their employees. Methods: We surveyed 276 employees of 46 waterpipe tobacco venues in Istanbul, Moscow, and Cairo. We interviewed venue managers and employees and collected biological samples from employees to measure exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), hair nicotine, saliva cotinine, urine cotinine, urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), and urine 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide (1-OHPG). We estimated adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMR) of each SHS biomarker by employee characteristics and indoor air SHS measures. Results: There were 73 nonsmoking employees and 203 current smokers of cigarettes or waterpipe. In nonsmokers, the median (interquartile) range concentrations of SHS biomarkers were 1.1 (0.2, 40.9) µg/g creatinine urine cotinine, 5.5 (2, 15) ng/mL saliva cotinine, 0.95 (0.36, 5.02) ng/mg hair nicotine, 1.48 (0.98, 3.97) pg/mg creatinine urine NNAL, 0.54 (0.25, 0.97) pmol/mg creatinine urine 1-OHPG, and 1.67 (1.33, 2.33) ppm exhaled CO. An 8-hour increase in work hours was associated with higher urine cotinine (GMR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.37) and hair nicotine (GMR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.43). Lighting waterpipes was associated with higher saliva cotinine (GMR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.05, 7.62). Conclusions: Nonsmoking employees of waterpipe tobacco venues were exposed to high levels of SHS, including measurable levels of carcinogenic biomarkers (tobacco-specific nitrosamines and PAHs). Implications: Smoke-free regulation should be extended to waterpipe venues to protect nonsmoking employees and patrons from the adverse health effects of SHS.
Background: Most smoke-free legislation to reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure exempts waterpipe (hookah) smoking venues. Few studies have examined SHS exposure in waterpipe venues and their employees. Methods: We surveyed 276 employees of 46 waterpipe tobacco venues in Istanbul, Moscow, and Cairo. We interviewed venue managers and employees and collected biological samples from employees to measure exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), hair nicotine, saliva cotinine, urine cotinine, urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), and urine 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide (1-OHPG). We estimated adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMR) of each SHS biomarker by employee characteristics and indoor air SHS measures. Results: There were 73 nonsmoking employees and 203 current smokers of cigarettes or waterpipe. In nonsmokers, the median (interquartile) range concentrations of SHS biomarkers were 1.1 (0.2, 40.9) µg/g creatinine urine cotinine, 5.5 (2, 15) ng/mL saliva cotinine, 0.95 (0.36, 5.02) ng/mg hair nicotine, 1.48 (0.98, 3.97) pg/mg creatinine urine NNAL, 0.54 (0.25, 0.97) pmol/mg creatinine urine 1-OHPG, and 1.67 (1.33, 2.33) ppm exhaled CO. An 8-hour increase in work hours was associated with higher urine cotinine (GMR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.37) and hair nicotine (GMR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.43). Lighting waterpipes was associated with higher saliva cotinine (GMR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.05, 7.62). Conclusions: Nonsmoking employees of waterpipe tobacco venues were exposed to high levels of SHS, including measurable levels of carcinogenic biomarkers (tobacco-specific nitrosamines and PAHs). Implications: Smoke-free regulation should be extended to waterpipe venues to protect nonsmoking employees and patrons from the adverse health effects of SHS.
Authors: Daniel Menzies; Arun Nair; Peter A Williamson; Stuart Schembri; Mudher Z H Al-Khairalla; Martyn Barnes; Tom C Fardon; Lesley McFarlane; Gareth J Magee; Brian J Lipworth Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jens Schubert; Jürgen Hahn; Gerhard Dettbarn; Albrecht Seidel; Andreas Luch; Thomas G Schulz Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Radwan Al Ali; Samer Rastam; Iman Ibrahim; Asma Bazzi; Sanaa Fayad; Alan L Shihadeh; Ghazi S Zaatari; Wasim Maziak Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Ahmad H Abu Raddaha; Delia Dempsey; Christopher Havel; Margaret Peng; Lisa Yu; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Plernpit Suwan-ampai; Ana Navas-Acien; Paul T Strickland; Jacqueline Agnew Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christine M Torrey; Katherine A Moon; D' Ann L Williams; Tim Green; Joanna E Cohen; Ana Navas-Acien; Patrick N Breysse Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Wasim Maziak; Thomas Eissenberg; Kenneth D Ward; George Thurston; Brian A King; Erin L Sutfin; Caroline O Cobb; Merlyn Griffiths; Larry B Goldstein; Mary Rezk-Hanna Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bekir Kaplan; Thomas Sussan; Ana Rule; Katherine Moon; Maria Grau-Perez; Pablo Olmedo; Rui Chen; Asli Carkoglu; Vladimir Levshin; Lanqing Wang; Clifford Watson; Benjamin Blount; Antonia M Calafat; Jeffery Jarrett; Kathleen Caldwell; Yuesong Wang; Pattrick Breysse; Paul Strickland; Joanna Cohen; Shyam Biswal; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Maya Hassane; Zahraa Rahal; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Jiexin Zhang; Ansam Sinjab; Justin W Wong; Wei Lu; Paul Scheet; J Jack Lee; Maria Gabriela Raso; Luisa M Solis; Junya Fujimoto; Hassan Chami; Alan L Shihadeh; Humam Kadara Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Ahmed B Alarabi; Zubair A Karim; Jean E Montes Ramirez; Keziah R Hernandez; Patricia A Lozano; José O Rivera; Fatima Z Alshbool; Fadi T Khasawneh Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Sònia Torres; Carla Merino; Beatrix Paton; Xavier Correig; Noelia Ramírez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jenni Shearston; Lily Lee; James Eazor; Saher Meherally; Su Hyun Park; Mj Ruzmyn Vilcassim; Michael Weitzman; Terry Gordon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 2.692