Literature DB >> 2227319

Schatzki's ring: long-term results following dilation.

J L Groskreutz1, C H Kim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report long-term results of 61 patients with Schatzki's ring who were dilated for relief of dysphagia. The severity of Schatzki's ring was mild in 28 patients (46%), moderate in 26 (43%), severe in 5 (8%), and indeterminate in 2 (3%). Follow-up information was available in 56 of 61 patients (mean, 75 months). During follow-up, 35 patients (63%) developed recurrent dysphagia and required repeated dilations: 19 patients (34%) had one to two dilations, 9 patients (16%) had three to seven dilations, 6 patients (11%) had more than seven dilations; 1 patient underwent surgery for resection of the Schatzki's ring (2%). The mean (range) dilation-free interval was 50.1 months (11.8 to 100 months) in mild cases, 44.5 months (8.9 to 82 months) in moderate cases, and 28.6 months (9 to 76 months) in severe cases. There was no significant correlation between the severity of Schatzki's ring on initial presentation and the subsequent dilation-free interval. Our data indicate that recurrent dysphagia is common among patients with Schatzki's ring after a successful dilation, and that the severity of Schatzki's ring is not a good prognostic indicator of the need for subsequent dilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2227319     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(90)71119-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

1.  Long-term recurrence rates following dilation of symptomatic Schatzki rings.

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Ines Gockel; Jochem König; Kathrin Kuhr; Volker F Eckardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Diagnosis and management of esophageal rings and webs.

Authors:  Michael S Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-11

3.  Effectiveness of single dilation with Maloney dilator versus endoscopic rupture of Schatzki's ring using biopsy forceps.

Authors:  P Chotiprasidhi; A Minocha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Schatzki's rings do not protect against acid reflux and may decrease esophageal acid clearance.

Authors:  George R Winters; Corinne L Maydonovitch; Roy K H Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Schatzki's ring: to cut or break an unresolved problem.

Authors:  Abeer Ibrahim; Rhonda A Cole; Waqar A Qureshi; Ahmed Z Helaly; Ali Jamecci; David Y Graham; Kamran Ayub
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Might Induce Certain-Supposedly Adaptive-Changes in the Esophagus: A Hypothesis.

Authors:  Laura Bognár; András Vereczkei; András Papp; Gábor Jancsó; Örs Péter Horváth
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; Hasan N Haboubi; Yeng Ang; Philip Boger; Pradeep Bhandari; John de Caestecker; Helen Griffiths; Rehan Haidry; Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Praful Patel; Stuart Paterson; Krish Ragunath; Peter Watson; Peter D Siersema; Stephen E Attwood
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.