| Literature DB >> 22272349 |
Shixia Xu1, Jianfeng Ju, Xuming Zhou, Lian Wang, Kaiya Zhou, Guang Yang.
Abstract
To further extend our understanding of the mechanism causing the current nearly extinct status of the baiji (Lipotes vexillifer), one of the most critically endangered species in the world, genetic diversity at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II DRB locus was investigated in the baiji. Nine highly divergent DRB alleles were identified in 17 samples, with an average of 28.4 (13.2%) nucleotide difference and 16.7 (23.5%) amino acid difference between alleles. The unexpectedly high levels of DRB allelic diversity in the baiji may partly be attributable to its evolutionary adaptations to the freshwater environment which is regarded to have a higher parasite diversity compared to the marine environment. In addition, balancing selection was found to be the main mechanisms in generating sequence diversity at baiji DRB gene. Considerable sequence variation at the adaptive MHC genes despite of significant loss of neutral genetic variation in baiji genome might suggest that intense selection has overpowered random genetic drift as the main evolutionary forces, which further suggested that the critically endangered or nearly extinct status of the baiji is not an outcome of genetic collapse.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22272349 PMCID: PMC3260281 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Historical distribution of the baiji in main Yangtze River and neighbouring water bodies.
The dot indicates baiji distribution by 1980s inferred from survey data (1979–1981) by Zhou [7]; the square indicates the remnant habitatof the baiji inferred from 1997 survey data by Zhang et al. [8].
Alignment of predicted amino acid sequences of baiji MHC DRB exon 2 and their allelic frequencies.
| + + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ ++ | Allelefrequency | |
| 1112222222 2223333333 3334444444 4445555555 5556666666 6667777777 7777888888 8 | ||
| 7890123456 7890123456 7890123456 7890123456 7890123456 7890123456 7890123456 7 | ||
|
| FSNGTERVRF VERHIYNREE YVRFDSDVGE YRAVTELGRR TAEYWNSQKD ILEQNQAALD TYCRHNYEAV E | 0.294 |
|
| ....M.Q… LA.YT..AQ. D.H....... F........P D…G.Q… FM..MR.KV. .V..S..WGI G | 0.177 |
|
| .......... .V.RT..... FL........ .....G.... …N...... L…E..KV. .......RV. . | 0.118 |
|
| .........L LVTN…G.. …Y...... H......... .......... L..RRR.EV. .V.....GVG . | 0.147 |
|
| .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... . | 0.059 |
|
| .........L LVTN…G.. …Y...... H........P D......... L..RRR.EV. .V.....GVG . | 0.059 |
|
| .......... .......... FLL....... ....AD.... .......... L..RRR.... .......GVG . | 0.088 |
|
| .........L LVTS…G.. …Y...... H......... .......... L..RRR.EV. .V.....GVG . | 0.029 |
|
| .......... .V.RT..... FL........ .......... …N...... L…E..KV. .......RV. . | 0.029 |
Dots indicate residues identical to the reference sequence of Live-DRB*01. Putative peptide binding sites according to the three dimensional structure of human HLA DRB molecules [27] are marked with ‘+’.
The estimated rates of nonsynonymous (d N) and synonymous (d S) substitutions for the peptide binding region (PBR) and other regions (non-PBR) and their ratio for DRB exon 2 sequences in the baiji.
| Positions | Codons |
|
|
|
|
| PBR | 19 | 0.196(0.059) | 0.054(0.028) | 3.630 | 0.009 |
| Non-PBR | 52 | 0.147(0.032) | 0.113(0.028) | 1.301 | 0.193 |
| All | 71 | 0.160(0.029) | 0.097(0.023) | 1.649 | 0.032 |
d N and d S were computed according to the Nei-Gojobori method [55], with standard errors obtained through 1,000 bootstrap replicates in parentheses, and P was the probability that d N and d S are different using a Z-test.
Results of maximum-likelihood models for exon 2 of the DRB gene in the baiji.
| Model code | P | Log-likelihood | ΔAIC | Parameter estimates | Positively selected sites |
| M0 (one ratio) | 1 | −684.029 | 22.788 | ω = 0.442, K = 2.268 | None |
| M1a (nearly neutral) | 1 | −663.348 | 2.107 | p0 = 0.455, p1 = 0.545, K = 2.704, ω0 = 0, ω1 = 1.0 | Not allowed |
| M2a (positive selection) | 3 | −661.388 | 0.147 | p0 = 0.450, p1 = 0.534, p2 = 0.016, K = 2.715, ω0 = 0, ω1 = 1, ω2 = 11.708 | 71N (0.958) |
| M3 (discrete) | 5 | −661.241 | Best | p0 = 0.455, p1 = 0.530, p2 = 0.016, K = 2.748, ω0 = 0, ω1 = 1.188, ω2 = 13.405 | Not allowed |
| M7 (beta) | 2 | −663.560 | 2.319 | p = 0.017, q = 0.016, K = 2.698 | Not allowed |
| M8 (beta and omega) | 4 | −663.062 | 1.821 | p0 = 0.461, p1 = 0.539, p2 = 0.005, q = 3.074, ω = 1.263, K = 2.753 | 30H(0.813), 57T(0.832),71N(0.980), 85A(0.822), 86Y(0.836) |
Analyses were completed using CodeML (included in the PAML 4 program suite). An alignment of 9 DRB sequences (213 bp) from the baiji was used as the input for CodeML. P is the number of parameters in the ω distribution, ω is the selection parameter (d N/d S), K estimated transition/transversion rate ratio, and pn proportion of sites that fall into the ωn site class. For models M7 and M8, p and q are the shape parameters of the β function. Positively selected sites were identified in models M2a and M8 by the Bayes empirical Bayes procedure [57]. Sites inferred to be under positive selection are given at the 80% confidence interval level and the levels are given in parentheses. See “Data analysis” and Yang et al. [58] for detailed method description.
Recombinant sequences at the baiji DRB exon 2.
| Recombinant sequence | Breakpoint positions | Potential Parent Sequence | Method(Average P-value) | |||
| Begin | End | Length | MAXCHI | SISCAN | ||
|
| 83 | 198 | 115 |
| 6.172*10−1 | 8.928*10−3 |
|
| 146 | 189 | 43 |
| 6.172*10−1 | 8.928*10−3 |
|
| 83 | 198 | 115 |
| 6.172*10−1 | 8.928*10−3 |
|
| 83 | 198 | 115 |
| 6.172*10−1 | 8.928*10−3 |
Minor parental sequence: Parent contributing the smaller fraction of sequence, Major parental sequence: Parent contributing the larger fraction of sequence. Unknown: means uncertain parent sequences.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationships of the baiji MHC II DRB alleles (grey frame) with a representative set of other cetacean alleles.
Bootstrap values above 50% (from the neighbour-joining analysis) are shown above respective branches, whereas Bayesian posterior probabilities above 70% are shown below branches. Trees were rooted using Bison bison, Bibi-DRB (DQ354665) and Hippopotamus amphibious, Hiam-DRB (EF017820) sequences. Other allelic sequences downloaded from GenBank were included in the analyses, they are: Balaenoptera musculus (Bamu94001-DRB*3c: DQ354666; Bamu94003-DRB*1-2: DQ354667-DQ354668); Balaena mysticetus (Bamy92005-DRB*1c: DQ354669; Bamy92005-DRB*2c: DQ354671); B. physalus (BaphM02-DRB*1c: DQ354672; BaphM02-DRB*2: DQ354673; BaphM08-DRB*3: DQ354674); C. hectori (CeheBP18-DRB: DQ354675); Eubalaena australis (EuauWA9511-DRB2*1c: DQ354676); Eschrichtius robustus (EsroWa408-DRB*1c: DQ354678); Hyperoodon ampullatus (HyamIC454-DRB: DQ354679); Mesoplodon carlhubbsi (MecaSW1563-DRB: DQ354680); Delphinapterus leucas (Dele-DRB1*0101-0501: AF012930-AF012937); Monodon monoceros (Momo-DRB*0101-0103: AF012939-AF012941); P. sinus (Phsi-DRB*0101-0102: DQ914413-DQ914414); P. spinipinnis (Phsp-DRB*0101-0103: DQ914415-DQ914417); N. phocaenoides (Neph-DRB*01-14: FJ416157–FJ416170).
Genetic variation at the DRB exon 2 of some endangered or near threatened species.
| Species | Status | Locations | sample size | Number of alleles | Observed heterozygosity | %N | %A | Reference |
| Baiji, | Critically Endangered | The Yangtze River, China | 17 | 9 (215) | 0.71 | 12.2 (1–57) | 23.9 (0–30) | This study |
| Vaquita, | Critically Endangered | Upper Gulf of California | 29 | 2 (210) | 0.37 | 0.5(1) | 1.5(1) |
|
| San Nicolas Island fox | Critically Endangered | California Channel Island | 152 | 3(267) | 0.36 | 7.5 (13–24) | 12.7 (9–14) |
|
| Giant panda | Endangered | Sichuan and Shanxi, China | 60 | 7 (282) | 0.62 | 10.6(7–47) | 16.8(4–25) |
|
| Beluga | Near Threatened | St. Lawrence Estuary, Bering Sea,Hudson Strait, Baffin Bay | 313 | 8(238) | NA | 7.2(1–25) | 17.5(1–19) |
|
| North American bison | Near Threatened | South Dakota and Montana | 20 | 9(250) | NA | 8.55(NA) | 13.22(3–19) |
|
| European mink | Endangered | Estonian, Russia | 20 | 9(229) | NA | 6.2(4–25) | 5.4(2–11) |
|
The information on all studies derived from DRB sequence analysis includes sample size, number of alleles, length in base pairs (bp) of the DNA fragment analysed in parentheses, observed heterozygosity, average percentage nucleotide (%N) and amino acid (%A) divergence between alleles. In parentheses are the minimum and maximum number of nucleotide (or amino acid, respectively) differences observed between pairs of alleles.