Literature DB >> 22271377

Psychological distress with direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a case report of an unexpected BRCA positive test result.

Lindsay Dohany1, Shanna Gustafson, Whitney Ducaine, Dana Zakalik.   

Abstract

We report a case of a client who discovered she had a BRCA mutation following direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing in the absence of genetic counseling. After testing she presented for genetic counseling with anxiety, distress, and a deficit of knowledge about what the DTC genetic testing revealed. Genetic counseling helped alleviate distress while empowering the client to apply the results of testing to improve medical management. Despite recent studies demonstrating no negative psychological impact of DTC genetic testing on the consumer, this case illustrates that significant psychological distress and confusion can occur as a result of DTC genetic testing for highly penetrant single gene disorders. Pre- and post-test genetic counseling in conjunction with DTC genetic testing may alleviate consumers' distress and empower clients to proactively utilize their result information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22271377     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9475-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  9 in total

1.  Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing.

Authors:  S C Hull; K Prasad
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Sara Chandros Hull; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Errors in delivery of cancer genetics services: implications for practice.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle Campfield; Whitney Ducaine; Lindsay Dohany; Talia Donenberg; Kristen Shannon; Robin C Schwartz; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2010-08

4.  Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predisposition genetic testing for late-onset disorders in adults. A position paper of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  W C McKinnon; B J Baty; R L Bennett; M Magee; W A Neufeld-Kaiser; K F Peters; J C Sawyer; K A Schneider
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Joan H Marks; Jessica B Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Direct to confusion: lessons learned from marketing BRCA testing.

Authors:  Ellen Matloff; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 11.229

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Classifying married adults diagnosed with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency based on spousal communication patterns using latent class analysis: insights for intervention.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Sara E Wienke; Michelle K Baker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Brianne E Kirkpatrick; Misha D Rashkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

4.  Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling de Paor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk.

Authors:  K M Broady; K E Ormond; E J Topol; N J Schork; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-13

6.  Alpha-1 couples: interpersonal and intrapersonal predictors of spousal communication and stress.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Sara Wienke; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Adam Hudson Buchanan; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Janet L Williams
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing.

Authors:  Uta Francke; Cheri Dijamco; Amy K Kiefer; Nicholas Eriksson; Bianca Moiseff; Joyce Y Tung; Joanna L Mountain
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The 10th Oxbridge varsity medical ethics debate-should we fear the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing?

Authors:  Christian Michael Armstrong Holland; Edward Harry Arbe-Barnes; Euan Joseph McGivern; Ruairidh Mungo Connor Forgan
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.464

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.