Literature DB >> 12365961

Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.

Sarah E Gollust1, Sara Chandros Hull, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Although direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements for pharmaceuticals have been appearing in the mass media for 20 years, DTC advertisements for genetic testing have only recently appeared. Advertisements for genetic testing can provide both consumers and physicians with information about test availability in an expanding market. However, 3 factors limit the value and appropriateness of advertisements: complex information, a complicated social context surrounding genetics, and a lack of consensus about the clinical utility of some tests. Consideration of several advertisements suggests that they overstate the value of genetic testing for consumers' clinical care. Furthermore, advertisements may provide misinformation about genetics, exaggerate consumers' risks, endorse a deterministic relationship between genes and disease, and reinforce associations between diseases and ethnic groups. Advertising motivated by factors other than evidence of the clinical value of genetic tests can manipulate consumers' behavior by exploiting their fears and worries. At this time, DTC advertisements are inappropriate, given the public's limited sophistication regarding genetics and the lack of comprehensive premarket review of tests or oversight of advertisement content. Existing Federal Trade Commission and Food and Drug Administration regulations for other types of health-related advertising should be applied to advertisements for genetic tests.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365961     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  47 in total

1.  Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Psychological distress with direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a case report of an unexpected BRCA positive test result.

Authors:  Lindsay Dohany; Shanna Gustafson; Whitney Ducaine; Dana Zakalik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling and the ethical issues around direct to consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins; Anita Ho
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Kandamurugu Manickam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Ethics and neuropsychiatric genetics: a review of major issues.

Authors:  Steven K Hoge; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.