Literature DB >> 10633895

Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan.

D J Bokor1, M D O'Sullivan, G J Hazan.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the variability of measurement that might occur with rotation of the scapula in the coronal plane when computed tomography scanning is used. Ten dry scapula specimens had 4 sets of computed tomography scans performed at +20 degrees, +10 degrees, neutral, and -10 degrees of scapula rotation. The angle of glenoid version was then measured according to the technique of Friedman. The measured value for glenoid version was noted to vary by as much as 10 degrees on the same specimen with minor rotation of the scapula. This result occurred because of differences in the curvature of the vertebral border of the scapula. The measured angle of glenoid version was most likely to vary with rotation of the scapula 10 degrees downward (i.e., glenoid articular surface facing 10 degrees upward). For accurate and reproducible measurement of the glenoid version, it is essential that in the scout view the glenoid orientation is neutral (i.e., glenoid surface is perpendicular to the plane of the computed tomography cut).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10633895     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90096-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  33 in total

1.  3D morphometric analysis of 43 scapulae.

Authors:  Xavier Ohl; Fabien Billuart; Pierre-Yves Lagacé; Olivier Gagey; Nicola Hagemeister; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Surgical management of the biconcave (B2) glenoid.

Authors:  Kenneth W Donohue; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Determination of a new computed tomography method for measuring the glenoid version and comparing with a reference method. Radio-anatomical and retrospective study.

Authors:  Julien Andrin; Charbel Macaron; Pierre Pottecher; Pierre Martz; Emmanuel Baulot; Pierre Trouilloud; Brice Viard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal humeral and glenoid geometry using MicroScribe 3D digitizer.

Authors:  Wejdan H Owaydhah; Mohammad A Alobaidy; Abdulrahman S Alraddadi; Roger W Soames
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Jakub Stefaniak; Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marcin Dzianach; Marcin Redman; Janusz Piontek; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Evaluation of three-dimensional glenoid structure using MRI.

Authors:  H Inui; K Sugamoto; T Miyamoto; A Machida; J Hashimoto; K Nobuhara
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Sughran Banerjee; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew L Wallace; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2008-04

9.  Three-dimensional humeral morphologic alterations and atrophy associated with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Sylvain Brochard; Abrahm J Behnam; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Is premorbid glenoid anatomy altered in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Michael D Hendel; David N Collins; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.