PURPOSE: [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging may improve assessment of radiation response in patients with head and neck cancer, but it is not yet known for which patients this is most useful. We conducted a prospective trial to identify patient populations likely to benefit from the addition of functional imaging to the assessment of radiotherapy response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were prospectively enrolled and treated with primary radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Functional and anatomic imaging response was correlated with clinical and pathologic response. Imaging accuracy was then compared between imaging modalities. RESULTS: Although postradiation maximum standard uptake values were significantly higher in nonresponders compared with responders, the positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET/CT scanning were similar to those for CT alone in the unselected study population. Subset analyses revealed that FDG-PET/CT outperformed CT alone in response assessment for patients at high risk for treatment failure (those with human papillomavirus [HPV] -negative disease, nonoropharyngeal primaries, or history of tobacco use). No benefit to FDG-PET/CT was seen for low-risk patients lacking these features. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the broad application of FDG-PET/CT for radiation response assessment in unselected head and neck cancer patients. However, FDG-PET/CT may be the imaging modality of choice for patients with highest risk disease, particularly those with HPV-negative tumors. Optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiotherapy merits further investigation.
PURPOSE: [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging may improve assessment of radiation response in patients with head and neck cancer, but it is not yet known for which patients this is most useful. We conducted a prospective trial to identify patient populations likely to benefit from the addition of functional imaging to the assessment of radiotherapy response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were prospectively enrolled and treated with primary radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Functional and anatomic imaging response was correlated with clinical and pathologic response. Imaging accuracy was then compared between imaging modalities. RESULTS: Although postradiation maximum standard uptake values were significantly higher in nonresponders compared with responders, the positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET/CT scanning were similar to those for CT alone in the unselected study population. Subset analyses revealed that FDG-PET/CT outperformed CT alone in response assessment for patients at high risk for treatment failure (those with human papillomavirus [HPV] -negative disease, nonoropharyngeal primaries, or history of tobacco use). No benefit to FDG-PET/CT was seen for low-risk patients lacking these features. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the broad application of FDG-PET/CT for radiation response assessment in unselected head and neck cancerpatients. However, FDG-PET/CT may be the imaging modality of choice for patients with highest risk disease, particularly those with HPV-negative tumors. Optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiotherapy merits further investigation.
Authors: Regiane S Andrade; Dwight E Heron; Berna Degirmenci; Pedro A A Filho; Barton F Branstetter; Raja R Seethala; Robert L Ferris; Norbert Avril Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: B Jeremic; Y Shibamoto; B Milicic; N Nikolic; A Dagovic; J Aleksandrovic; Z Vaskovic; L Tadic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; Pei-Fong Wong; Sam S Tung; David I Rosenthal; Lei Dong; Brian Mason; George H Perkins; K Kian Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carole Fakhry; William H Westra; Sigui Li; Anthony Cmelak; John A Ridge; Harlan Pinto; Arlene Forastiere; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jayakar V Nayak; Rohan R Walvekar; Regiane S Andrade; Nicole Daamen; Stephen Y Lai; Athanassios Argiris; Ryan P Smith; Dwight E Heron; Robert L Ferris; Jonas T Johnson; Barton F Branstetter Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Min Yao; Pifu Luo; Henry T Hoffman; Kristi Chang; Michael M Graham; Yusuf Menda; Huaming Tan; John M Buatti Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: James D Murphy; Trang H La; Karen Chu; Andrew Quon; Nancy J Fischbein; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chad Tang; James D Murphy; Brian Khong; Trang H La; Christina Kong; Nancy J Fischbein; A Dimitrios Colevas; Andrei H Iagaru; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-01-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Juliette Thariat; K Kian Ang; Pamela K Allen; Anesa Ahamad; Michelle D Williams; Jeffrey N Myers; Adel K El-Naggar; Lawrence E Ginsberg; David I Rosenthal; Bonnie S Glisson; William H Morrison; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: S S Yom; A S Garden; G A Staerkel; L E Ginsberg; W H Morrison; E M Sturgis; D I Rosenthal; J N Myers; B S Edeiken-Monroe Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Bhupesh Parashar; A Gabriella Wernicke; Samuel Rice; Joseph Osborne; Prabhsimranjot Singh; Dattatreyudu Nori; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley Goldsmith; K S Clifford Chao Journal: Discov Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.970