Literature DB >> 17242397

Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma.

Malik E Juweid1, Sigrid Stroobants, Otto S Hoekstra, Felix M Mottaghy, Markus Dietlein, Ali Guermazi, Gregory A Wiseman, Lale Kostakoglu, Klemens Scheidhauer, Andreas Buck, Ralph Naumann, Karoline Spaepen, Rodney J Hicks, Wolfgang A Weber, Sven N Reske, Markus Schwaiger, Lawrence H Schwartz, Josee M Zijlstra, Barry A Siegel, Bruce D Cheson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines for performing and interpreting positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for treatment assessment in patients with lymphoma both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.
METHODS: An International Harmonization Project (IHP) was convened to discuss standardization of clinical trial parameters in lymphoma. An imaging subcommittee developed consensus recommendations based on published PET literature and the collective expertise of its members in the use of PET in lymphoma. Only recommendations subsequently endorsed by all IHP subcommittees were adopted. RECOMMENDATIONS: PET after completion of therapy should be performed at least 3 weeks, and preferably at 6 to 8 weeks, after chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, and 8 to 12 weeks after radiation or chemoradiotherapy. Visual assessment alone is adequate for interpreting PET findings as positive or negative when assessing response after completion of therapy. Mediastinal blood pool activity is recommended as the reference background activity to define PET positivity for a residual mass > or = 2 cm in greatest transverse diameter, regardless of its location. A smaller residual mass or a normal sized lymph node (ie, < or = 1 x 1 cm in diameter) should be considered positive if its activity is above that of the surrounding background. Specific criteria for defining PET positivity in the liver, spleen, lung, and bone marrow are also proposed. Use of attenuation-corrected PET is strongly encouraged. Use of PET for treatment monitoring during a course of therapy should only be done in a clinical trial or as part of a prospective registry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242397     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  355 in total

1.  High maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) on PET scan is associated with shorter survival in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Dai Chihara; Yasuhiro Oki; Hiroshi Onoda; Hirofumi Taji; Kazuhito Yamamoto; Tsuneo Tamaki; Yasuo Morishima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Stable isotope-resolved metabolomics and applications for drug development.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Katherine Sellers; Hunter N B Moseley; Richard M Higashi; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 3.  Burkitt lymphoma: staging and response evaluation.

Authors:  John T Sandlund
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Role of [18F]-FDG-PET/MDCT in evaluating early response in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; E Gaspari; F Della Gatta; R Danieli; F Bolacchi; C Ragano Caracciolo; A Mancini; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Phase 2 study of rituximab plus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Yasuhiro Oki; Peter McLaughlin; Amanda R Copeland; Andre Goy; Barbara Pro; Lei Feng; Ying Yuan; Hubert H Chuang; Homer A Macapinlac; Fredrick Hagemeister; Jorge Romaguera; Felipe Samaniego; Michelle A Fanale; Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja; Maria A Rodriguez; Nam Dang; Larry W Kwak; Sattva S Neelapu; Luis E Fayad
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Deep Auto-context Convolutional Neural Networks for Standard-Dose PET Image Estimation from Low-Dose PET/MRI.

Authors:  Lei Xiang; Yu Qiao; Dong Nie; Le An; Qian Wang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.719

8.  Predictive value of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Bing Bai; Hui-Qiang Huang; Qi-Chun Cai; Wei Fan; Xiao-Xiao Wang; Xu Zhang; Ze-Xiao Lin; Yan Gao; Yun-Fei Xia; Ying Guo; Qing-Qing Cai; Wen-Qi Jiang; Tong-Yu Lin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Dynamic changes of FDG uptake and clearance in normal tissues.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Abass Alavi; Esther Lim; Thomas J Werner; Catherine V Del Bello; Scott R Akers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  PET/CT assessment in follicular lymphoma using standardized criteria: central review in the PRIMA study.

Authors:  Christelle Tychyj-Pinel; Fabien Ricard; Michael Fulham; Marion Fournier; Michel Meignan; Thierry Lamy; Pierre Vera; Gilles Salles; Judith Trotman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.