Literature DB >> 24548328

The exception does not rule: attention constrains form preparation in word production.

Pádraig G O'Séaghdha1, Alexandra K Frazer1.   

Abstract

Form preparation in word production, the benefit of exploiting a useful common sound (such as the first phoneme) of iteratively spoken small groups of words, is notoriously fastidious, exhibiting a seemingly categorical, all-or-none character and a corresponding susceptibility to "killers" of preparation. In particular, the presence of a single exception item in a group of otherwise phonologically consistent words has been found to eliminate the benefit of knowing a majority characteristic. This has been interpreted to mean that form preparation amounts to partial production and thus provides a window on fundamental processes of phonological word encoding (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999). However, preparation of only fully distributed properties appears to be nonoptimal and is difficult to reconcile with the sensitivity of cognitive responses to probabilities in other domains. We show here that the all-or-none characteristic of form preparation is specific to task format. Preparation for sets that included an exception item occurred in ecologically valid production tasks, picture naming (Experiment 1), and word naming (Experiment 2). Preparation failed only in the commonly used, but indirect and resource-intensive, associative cuing task (Experiment 3). We outline an account of form preparation in which anticipation of word-initial phonological fragments uses a limited-capacity, sustained attentional capability that points to rather than enacts possibilities for imminent speech. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548328      PMCID: PMC4102258          DOI: 10.1037/a0035576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs; Harald Baayen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

3.  A working memory workout: how to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items in 10 hours or less.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella; Chandramallika Basak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

5.  The role of orthography in speech production revisited.

Authors:  F-X Alario; Laetitia Perre; Caroline Castel; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-03-20

6.  The contribution of orthography to spoken word production: evidence from Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yanchao Bi; Tao Wei; Niels Janssen; Zaizhu Han
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

7.  More attention when speaking: does it help or does it hurt?

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The sequential curing effect in speech production.

Authors:  C A Sevald; G S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Attention demands of spoken word planning: a review.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs; Vitória Piai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  The influence of orthographic experience on the development of phonological preparation in spoken word production.

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Min Wang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

2.  Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production.

Authors:  Bonnie Breining; Nazbanou Nozari; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Cognitive control during selection and repair in word production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Michael Freund; Bonnie Breining; Brenda Rapp; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production.

Authors:  Jenn-Yeu Chen; Pádraig G O'Séaghdha; Train-Min Chen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Behavioural evidence for segments as subordinate units in Chinese spoken word production: The form-preparation paradigm revisited.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Andus Wing-Kuen Wong; Yiu-Kei Tsang; Suiping Wang; Hsuan-Chih Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Metacognitive Treatment in Acquired Brain Injury and Its Applicability to Aphasia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amanda Wadams; Louisa Suting; André Lindsey; Jennifer Mozeiko
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Investigating the flow of information during speaking: the impact of morpho-phonological, associative, and categorical picture distractors on picture naming.

Authors:  Jens Bölte; Andrea Böhl; Christian Dobel; Pienie Zwitserlood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.