Literature DB >> 22268177

CT screening for lung cancer: implication of lung biopsy recommendations.

Ute Wagnetz1, Ravi J Menezes, Scott Boerner, Narinder S Paul, Dirk Wagnetz, Shaf Keshavjee, Heidi C Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to address the implications of invasive diagnostic procedures recommended by a lung cancer screening protocol. In particular, we assess how many invasive procedures were recommended for benign nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2009, 4782 high-risk current and former smokers were enrolled in a lung cancer screening study. A helical low-dose CT of the chest was performed. Morphologic features targeted were parenchymal nodules. The indication for biopsy was made according to the diagnostic algorithm provided by the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program. We recorded the time points of biopsy recommendation; shape, size, and growth of nodules; types of diagnostic procedures; complication rates; and final pathologic diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 128 diagnostic biopsies were recommended for suspicious nodules, and 127 biopsies were performed, including 110 percutaneous CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs), nine video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resections, seven bronchoscopies, and one ultrasound-guided biopsy of a lymph node. Of 110 FNABs, 24 had unsatisfactory results, 13 of which were referred for secondary diagnostic VATS resection. The indication for biopsy was made on the basis of shape in 48% of cases (62/128), growth on follow-up in 40% of cases (51/128), and the appearance of new nodules in 12% of cases (15/128). In total, 104 of 124 biopsies (84%) were correctly indicated (true-positive recommendation) for malignancy, 20 were benign (false-positive) (16%), and final results are pending for four cases. The overall false-positive recommendation rate was 0.42% (20/4782); 11.6% of FNABs (16/128) and 3.6% of VATS (5/128) revealed benign nodules, corresponding to an overall false-positive rate of 0.33% for FNAB (16/4782) and 0.10% for VATS (5/4782).
CONCLUSION: The recommended biopsy procedures for screen-detected suspicious pulmonary nodules resulted in a low intervention rate for benign nodules. This rate is minimal when we followed a research protocol that relies on shape and growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268177     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Rapid needle-out patient-rollover approach after CT-guided lung biopsy: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Ailbhe C O'Neill; Neasa Ní Mhuircheartaigh; Jonathan D Dodd
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  eComment. Positron emission tomography reduces the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions in lung cancer screening programmes.

Authors:  Paolo Scanagatta; Stefano Sestini
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12

Review 3.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status.

Authors:  Henry M Marshall; Rayleen V Bowman; Ian A Yang; Kwun M Fong; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  CT-guided fine-needle ago-biopsy of pulmonary nodules: predictive factors for diagnosis and pneumothorax occurrence.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Francesco Rosella; Valentina Dall'armi; Leda Marina Pomes; Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella; Dania Nachira; Tommaso Pirronti; Stefano Margaritora; Pierluigi Granone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Clinical analysis of non-AIDS patients pathologically diagnosed with pulmonary cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Kaixiong Liu; Haibo Ding; Bing Xu; Ruixiong You; Zhen Xing; Jianfeng Chen; Qichang Lin; Jieming Qu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Patient-specific image denoising for ultra-low-dose CT-guided lung biopsies.

Authors:  Michael Green; Edith M Marom; Eli Konen; Nahum Kiryati; Arnaldo Mayer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening guidelines: common ground and differences.

Authors:  Swati Gulati; James L Mulshine
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06

8.  Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.

Authors:  Nikki M Carroll; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Caroline A Joyce; William Kinnard; Eric J Harker; Virginia Hall; Julie S Steiner; Erica Blum-Barnett; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Risk factors for hemoptysis complicating 17-18 gauge CT-guided transthoracic needle core biopsy: multivariate analysis of 249 procedures.

Authors:  Guillaume Chassagnon; Jules Gregory; Marc Al Ahmar; Pierre Magdeleinat; Paul Legmann; Joel Coste; Marie Pierre Revel
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Clinical Implications of "Atypia" on Biopsy: Possible Precursor to Lung Cancer?

Authors:  Denise Albano; Lee Ann Santore; Thomas Bilfinger; Melissa Feraca; Samantha Novotny; Barbara Nemesure
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.