Gaiane M Rauch1, Basak E Dogan, Taletha B Smith, Ping Liu, Wei T Yang. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030, USA. gmrauch@mdanderson.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to correlate 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with surgical histologic findings to determine the upgrade rate and to correlate the frequency of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy cancer diagnosis with breast MRI indications and enhancement characteristics of targeted lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database search was performed of all MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed from January 1, 2005, to September 31, 2010. The breast MRI indications, history, age, risk factors, lesion size, enhancement characteristics, and pathologic diagnoses at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and at surgery were documented. Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 218 lesions underwent MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 197 women (mean age, 52 years; range, 28-76 years), of which 85 (39%) had surgical correlation. Of the 218 lesions, 48 (22%) were malignant, 133 (61%) were benign, and 37 (17%) were high risk according to MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Ten of 85 lesions (12%) were upgraded to malignancy at surgery, with a final malignancy rate of 25%. The frequency of malignancy was significantly higher in patients presenting for diagnostic (50/177 [28%]) versus screening (4/41 [10%]; p < 0.05) evaluation, patients with ipsilateral cancer (22/49 [45%]; p < 0.001), and lesions with washout kinetics (34/103 [33%]; p < 0.05) and was relatively higher in lesions with nonmasslike enhancement (26/76 [34%]; p = 0.07), which represented ductal carcinoma in situ in the majority of cases (17/26 [65%]; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients with ipsilateral cancer who have additional suspicious lesions identified on MRI require careful evaluation and biopsy to exclude additional sites of cancer that may impact surgical management.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to correlate 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with surgical histologic findings to determine the upgrade rate and to correlate the frequency of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy cancer diagnosis with breast MRI indications and enhancement characteristics of targeted lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database search was performed of all MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed from January 1, 2005, to September 31, 2010. The breast MRI indications, history, age, risk factors, lesion size, enhancement characteristics, and pathologic diagnoses at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and at surgery were documented. Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 218 lesions underwent MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 197 women (mean age, 52 years; range, 28-76 years), of which 85 (39%) had surgical correlation. Of the 218 lesions, 48 (22%) were malignant, 133 (61%) were benign, and 37 (17%) were high risk according to MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Ten of 85 lesions (12%) were upgraded to malignancy at surgery, with a final malignancy rate of 25%. The frequency of malignancy was significantly higher in patients presenting for diagnostic (50/177 [28%]) versus screening (4/41 [10%]; p < 0.05) evaluation, patients with ipsilateral cancer (22/49 [45%]; p < 0.001), and lesions with washout kinetics (34/103 [33%]; p < 0.05) and was relatively higher in lesions with nonmasslike enhancement (26/76 [34%]; p = 0.07), which represented ductal carcinoma in situ in the majority of cases (17/26 [65%]; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION:Patients with ipsilateral cancer who have additional suspicious lesions identified on MRI require careful evaluation and biopsy to exclude additional sites of cancer that may impact surgical management.
Authors: C Perlet; A Heinig; X Prat; J Casselman; L Baath; H Sittek; C Stets; J Lamarque; I Anderson; P Schneider; P Taourel; M Reiser; S H Heywang-Köbrunner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2002-04-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth R Deperi; Sue Peacock; Michelle D McDonough; Wendy B Demartini; Jennifer Shook Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: M L Luciani; F Pediconi; M Telesca; F Vasselli; V Casali; E Miglio; R Passariello; C Catalano Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Laura Liberman; Nanette Bracero; Elizabeth Morris; Cynthia Thornton; D David Dershaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C K Kuhl; R K Schmutzler; C C Leutner; A Kempe; E Wardelmann; A Hocke; M Maringa; U Pfeifer; D Krebs; H H Schild Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Steven G Lee; Susan G Orel; Irene J Woo; Eva Cruz-Jove; Mary E Putt; Lawrence J Solin; Brian J Czerniecki; Mitchell D Schnall Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-01-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Andrea F Abramson; Lee K Tan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Nour Sneige; Sung C Lim; Gary J Whitman; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Aysegul A Sahin; Terry L Smith; Carol B Stelling Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Cynthia M Thornton; Kimberly J Van Zee; Lee K Tan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Bethany L Niell; Sara C Gavenonis; Tina Motazedi; Jessica Cott Chubiz; Elkan P Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Janie M Lee Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Amy J Lilly; Meredith Johnson; Cherie M Kuzmiak; David W Ollila; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun Journal: Ann Diagn Pathol Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 2.090
Authors: Gustavo Moreno; Mariel Molina; Ruizhe Wu; Julie R Sullivan; Julie M Jorns Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ceren Yalnız; Juliana Rosenblat; David Spak; Wei Wei; Marion Scoggins; Carisa Le-Petross; Mark J Dryden; Beatriz Adrada; Başak E Doğan Journal: Eur J Breast Health Date: 2019-10-01
Authors: Megan E Speer; Monica L Huang; Basak E Dogan; Beatriz E Adrada; Rosalind P Candelaria; Kenneth R Hess; Palita Hansakul; Wei T Yang; Gaiane M Rauch Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.039