BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ADC histogram analysis can stratify outcomes in patients with GBM treated with bevacizumab. Therefore, we compared gene expression between high-versus-low ADC tumors to identify gene expression modules that could underlie this difference and impact patient prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Up-front bevacizumab-treated patients (N = 38) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were analyzed by using an ADC histogram approach based on enhancing tumor. Using microarrays, we compared gene expression in high-versus-low ADC tumors in patients subsequently treated with bevacizumab. Tissue sections from a subset of tumors were stained for collagen and collagen-binding proteins. Progression-free and overall survival was determined by using Cox proportional hazard ratios and the Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test. RESULTS: A total of 13 genes were expressed at 2-fold or greater levels in high- compared with low-ADC tumors at the P < .05 level. Of these, 6 encode for collagen or collagen-binding proteins. High gene expression for the collagen-binding protein decorin was associated with shorter survival (HR, 2.5; P = .03). The pattern and degree of collagen staining were highly variable in both high- and low-ADC tumors. CONCLUSIONS: High-ADC GBMs show greater levels of ECM protein gene expression compared with low-ADC GBMs. It is unclear whether this translates to the accumulation of higher levels of the encoded proteins. However, because ECM molecules could contribute to a proinvasive phenotype, this relationship merits further investigation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ADC histogram analysis can stratify outcomes in patients with GBM treated with bevacizumab. Therefore, we compared gene expression between high-versus-low ADC tumors to identify gene expression modules that could underlie this difference and impact patient prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Up-front bevacizumab-treated patients (N = 38) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were analyzed by using an ADC histogram approach based on enhancing tumor. Using microarrays, we compared gene expression in high-versus-low ADC tumors in patients subsequently treated with bevacizumab. Tissue sections from a subset of tumors were stained for collagen and collagen-binding proteins. Progression-free and overall survival was determined by using Cox proportional hazard ratios and the Kaplan-Meier method with the log rank test. RESULTS: A total of 13 genes were expressed at 2-fold or greater levels in high- compared with low-ADC tumors at the P < .05 level. Of these, 6 encode for collagen or collagen-binding proteins. High gene expression for the collagen-binding protein decorin was associated with shorter survival (HR, 2.5; P = .03). The pattern and degree of collagen staining were highly variable in both high- and low-ADC tumors. CONCLUSIONS: High-ADC GBMs show greater levels of ECM protein gene expression compared with low-ADC GBMs. It is unclear whether this translates to the accumulation of higher levels of the encoded proteins. However, because ECM molecules could contribute to a proinvasive phenotype, this relationship merits further investigation.
Authors: R K Gupta; K Nath; A Prasad; K N Prasad; M Husain; R K S Rathore; N Husain; C Srivastava; P Khetan; R Trivedi; P A Narayana Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Hyun J Kim; Jing Huo; Jeffry Alger; Matthew S Brown; David Gjertson; Victor Sai; Jonathan R Young; Leena Tekchandani; Timothy Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Jonathan Goldin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marc R J Carlson; Whitney B Pope; Steve Horvath; Jerome G Braunstein; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Cho-Lea Tso; Ingo Mellinghoff; Albert Lai; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Jun Dong; Stanley F Nelson; Timothy F Cloughesy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arvind Rao; Ganesh Rao; David A Gutman; Adam E Flanders; Scott N Hwang; Daniel L Rubin; Rivka R Colen; Pascal O Zinn; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Justin S Kirby; C Carl Jaffe; John Freymann Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: S Wang; S J Kim; H Poptani; J H Woo; S Mohan; R Jin; M R Voluck; D M O'Rourke; R L Wolf; E R Melhem; S Kim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nathan S White; Carrie McDonald; Carrie R McDonald; Niky Farid; Josh Kuperman; David Karow; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Hauke Bartsch; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Dominic Holland; Ahmed Shabaik; Atle Bjørnerud; Tuva Hope; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth; Michael Liss; J Kellogg Parsons; Clark C Chen; Steve Raman; Daniel Margolis; Robert E Reiter; Leonard Marks; Santosh Kesari; Arno J Mundt; Christopher J Kane; Christopher J Kaine; Bob S Carter; William G Bradley; Anders M Dale Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Fernando Vázquez-Villa; Marcos García-Ocaña; José A Galván; Jorge García-Martínez; Carmen García-Pravia; Primitiva Menéndez-Rodríguez; Carmen González-del Rey; Luis Barneo-Serra; Juan R de Los Toyos Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2015-03-12
Authors: Elizabeth R Gerstner; Zheng Zhang; James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Lucy Hanna; Erin Greco; Melissa Prah; Kathleen M Schmainda; Akiva Mintz; Lale Kostakoglu; Edward A Eikman; Benjamin M Ellingson; Eva-Maria Ratai; A Gregory Sorensen; Daniel P Barboriak; David A Mankoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 12.531