Literature DB >> 17032910

Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis.

Shuichi Higano1, Xia Yun, Toshihiro Kumabe, Mika Watanabe, Shunji Mugikura, Atsushi Umetsu, Akihiro Sato, Takayuki Yamada, Shoki Takahashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prediction of malignancy and prognosis of malignant astrocytic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study and did not require patient informed consent. Findings from 37 consecutive patients (21 men, 16 women; mean age, 43 years) with pathologically proved malignant astrocytic tumors that included 22 glioblastomas (GBMs) and 15 anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs) were retrospectively evaluated. The minimum ADC value of each tumor was preoperatively determined from several regions of interest defined in the tumor, preferably with avoidance of cystic or necrotic components, on ADC maps derived from isotropic diffusion-weighted images. Surgical intervention, followed by radiation therapy, was undertaken in all cases according to hospital protocol. Immunohistologically, Ki-67 labeling index (LI), indicating cell proliferation, was also determined. The patients were classified into two groups, progressive and stable, according to the 2-year observation after the initial treatment. Correlation analysis (Pearson product moment correlation), Student t test, Welch test, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test were used for statistical evaluation.
RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between minimum ADC and Ki-67 LI (r = -0.562, P < .001). The mean minimum ADC (0.834 x 10(-3) mm2 x sec(-1)) of GBM was significantly lower than that (1.06 x 10(-3) mm2 x sec(-1)) of AA (P < .001, Student t test). The mean minimum ADC (0.80 x 10(-3) mm2 x sec(-1)) of the progressive group was significantly lower than that (1.037 x 10(-3) mm2 x sec(-1)) of the stable group (P < .001). The cutoff value of 0.90 x 10(-3) mm2 x sec(-1) for minimum ADC for differentiation of patients with a favorable prognosis from those with a poor prognosis provided the best combination of sensitivity (79%) and specificity (81%) (receiver operating characteristic analysis). The significant difference in the prognosis between two groups classified by using this cutoff value of minimum ADC was noted (P = .002, log-rank test).
CONCLUSION: The minimum ADC of malignant astrocytomas can provide additional information about their clinical malignancy related to posttreatment prognosis. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032910     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  139 in total

1.  Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Keiichiro Nakamura; Ikuo Joja; Junichi Kodama; Atsushi Hongo; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T1 , T2 , and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking.

Authors:  Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hyeyeol Bae; Soichiro Yoshida; Yoh Matsuoka; Hiroshi Nakajima; Eisaku Ito; Hiroshi Tanaka; Miyako Oya; Takayuki Nakayama; Hideki Takeshita; Toshiki Kijima; Junichiro Ishioka; Noboru Numao; Fumitaka Koga; Kazutaka Saito; Takumi Akashi; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Prognostic Value of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Glioblastomas.

Authors:  G Çoban; S Mohan; F Kural; S Wang; D M O'Rourke; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  MR Imaging-Based Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Estimation of IDH1 Mutation Status.

Authors:  K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Radiogenomics correlation between MR imaging features and major genetic profiles in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Hong; Seung Hong Choi; Dong Jae Shin; Sang Won Jo; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Sung-Hye Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Tae Min Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Il Han Kim; Soon Tae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Imaging of central nervous system tumors in children: advances and limitations.

Authors:  Louis-Gilbert Vézina
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  A tool for improving the longitudinal imaging characterization for neuro-oncology cases.

Authors:  Ricky K Taira; Ricky Taira; Alex Bui; Alex At Bui; William Hsu; Vijayaraghavan Bashyam; Shishir Dube; Emily Watt; Lewellyn Andrada; Suzie El-Saden; Timothy Cloughesy; Hooshang Kangarloo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.