Literature DB >> 22266584

Risk factors for upper extremity venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.

Thomas Marnejon1, Debra Angelo, Ahmed Abu Abdou, David Gemmel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify clinically important risk factors associated with upper extremity venous thrombosis following peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC).
METHODS: A retrospective case control study of 400 consecutive patients with and without upper extremity venous thrombosis post-PICC insertion was performed. Patient data included demographics, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, site of insertion, size and lumen of catheter, internal length, infusate, and co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and renal failure. Additional risk factors analyzed were active cancer, any history of cancer, recent trauma, smoking, a history of prior deep vein thrombosis, and recent surgery, defined as surgery within three months prior to PICC insertion.
RESULTS: The prevalence of trauma, renal failure, and infusion with antibiotics and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was higher among patients exhibiting upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT), when compared to controls. Patients developing UEVT were also more likely to have PICC line placement in a basilic vein and less likely to have brachial vein placement (P<.001). Left-sided PICC line sites also posed a greater risk (P=.026). The rate of standard DVT prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin and the use of warfarin was similar in both groups. Average length of hospital stay was almost double among patients developing UEVT, 19.5 days, when compared to patients undergoing PICC line insertion without thrombosis, 10.8 days (t=6.98, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In multivariate analysis, trauma, renal failure, left-sided catheters, basilic placement, TPN, and infusion with antibiotics, specifically vancomycin, were significant risk factors for UEVT associated with PICC insertion. Prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin or use of warfarin did not prevent the development of venous thrombosis in patients with PICCs. Length of hospital stay and cost are markedly increased in patients who develop PICC-associated upper extremity venous thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266584     DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.

Authors:  G S Patel; K Jain; R Kumar; A H Strickland; L Pellegrini; J Slavotinek; M Eaton; W McLeay; T Price; M Ly; S Ullah; B Koczwara; G Kichenadasse; C S Karapetis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  A narrative review of long-term central venous access devices for the intensivist.

Authors:  David Moir; Andrew Bodenham
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-12-12

3.  Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case-control study in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Mireille El Ters; Gregory J Schears; Sandra J Taler; Amy W Williams; Robert C Albright; Bernice M Jenson; Amy L Mahon; Andrew H Stockland; Sanjay Misra; Scott L Nyberg; Andrew D Rule; Marie C Hogan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Peripherally inserted central catheters and other intravascular devices: how safe are they for hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Roman Shingarev; Michael Allon
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Large Cohort Study of Central Venous Catheter Thrombosis during Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy.

Authors:  Stéphanie Guillet; Valérie Zeller; Vincent Dubée; Françoise Ducroquet; Nicole Desplaces; Marie Hélène Horellou; Simon Marmor; Jean Marc Ziza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Shintaro Hashimoto; Ryota Otsubo; Masahiro Adachi; Ryoichiro Doi; Kenichiro Shibata; Isao Sano; Yoshihito Shibata; Takayuki Nakazaki; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Mary Hammes; Amishi Desai; Shravani Pasupneti; John Kress; Brian Funaki; Sydeaka Watson; Jean Herlitz; Jane Hines
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.975

8.  Nomogram predicted risk of peripherally inserted central catheter related thrombosis.

Authors:  Nan Hao; Xin Xie; Zhangjian Zhou; Jieqiong Li; Li Kang; Huili Wu; Pingli Guo; Chengxue Dang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  [The incidence and risk factors of catheter-related-thrombosis during induction chemotherapy in acute lymphocytic leukemia children].

Authors:  Y Y Wei; Y Y Zhang; Y Z Zhen; L Q Zhang; C G Jia; R D Zhang; H Y Zheng; X Y Wu; R H Wu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-04-14

10.  High risk of deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in lymphoma.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Jia-Jia Huang; Yi Xia; Chao-Feng Li; Yu Wang; Pan-Pan Liu; Xi-Wen Bi; Peng Sun; Tong-Yu Lin; Wen-Qi Jiang; Zhi-Ming Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.