Literature DB >> 22266153

Physicians' undecided attitudes toward posthumous reproduction: fertility preservation in cancer patients with a poor prognosis.

Gwendolyn P Quinn1, Caprice A Knapp, Teri L Malo, Jessica McIntyre, Paul B Jacobsen, Susan T Vadaparampil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established guidelines for fertility preservation for cancer patients. In a national study of US oncologists, we examined attitudes toward the use of fertility preservation among patients with a poor prognosis, focusing on attitudes toward posthumous reproduction.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was administered via mail and Internet to a stratified random sample of US oncologists. The survey measured demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice behaviors regarding posthumous reproduction and fertility preservation with cancer patients of childbearing age.
RESULTS: Only 16.2% supported posthumous parenting, whereas the majority (51.5%) did not have an opinion. Analysis of variance indicated that attitudes toward posthumous reproduction were significantly related to physician practice behaviors and were dependent on oncologists' knowledge of ASCO guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician attitudes may conflict with the recommended guidelines and may reduce the likelihood that some patients will receive information about fertility preservation. Further education may raise physicians' awareness of poor-prognostic patients' interest in pursuing this technology.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266153      PMCID: PMC4533919          DOI: 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Support Oncol        ISSN: 1544-6794


  32 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives.

Authors:  Joscph G Schenker
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Sperm cryopreservation before cancer chemotherapy helps in the emotional battle against cancer.

Authors:  Kazuo Saito; Kotaro Suzuki; Akira Iwasaki; Yasushi Yumura; Yoshinobu Kubota
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.

Authors:  C Thorpe; B Ryan; S L McLean; A Burt; M Stewart; J B Brown; G J Reid; S Harris
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 4.  Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?

Authors:  W Hamish B Wallace; Richard A Anderson; D Stewart Irvine
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors' attitudes and experiences.

Authors:  L R Schover; L A Rybicki; B A Martin; K A Bringelsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Cancer and fertility: ethical and legal challenges.

Authors:  John A Robertson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

7.  ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 11: Posthumous assisted reproduction.

Authors:  G Pennings; G de Wert; F Shenfield; J Cohen; P Devroey; B Tarlatzis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Women's reproductive health: monotheistic religious perspectives.

Authors:  J G Schenker
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 9.  Sperm retrieval from terminally ill or recently deceased patients: a review.

Authors:  Andrew C Kramer
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.344

10.  Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists' views.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Clement K Gwede; Cheryl Miree; Lindsey M King; Heather B Clayton; Crystal Wilson; Pamela Munster
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.062

View more
  6 in total

1.  Patient-Physician Communication and Knowledge Regarding Fertility Issues from German Oncologists' Perspective-a Quantitative Survey.

Authors:  Dorit Buske; Annekathrin Sender; Diana Richter; Elmar Brähler; Kristina Geue
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Fertility Preservation for Prepubertal Girls: Update and Current Challenges.

Authors:  Nina Resetkova; Masanori Hayashi; Lisa A Kolp; Mindy S Christianson
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Fertility preservation practices in pediatric and adolescent cancer patients undergoing HSCT in Europe: a population-based survey.

Authors:  T Diesch; A Rovo; N von der Weid; M Faraci; M Pillon; A Dalissier; J-H Dalle; P Bader
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The effects of anticancer drugs TSA and GSK on spermatogenesis in male mice.

Authors:  Wen-Yan Song; Qing-Ling Yang; Wan-Li Zhao; Hai-Xia Jin; Gui-Dong Yao; Zhao-Feng Peng; Sen-Lin Shi; Hong-Yi Yang; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Perspectives of Young Women With Gynecologic Cancers on Fertility and Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vânia Gonçalves; Pedro L Ferreira; Mona Saleh; Christina Tamargo; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.