INTRODUCTION: Although physician discussion with patients regarding fertility preservation (FP) options prior to cancer treatment can provide important information for survivors concerning their future fertility, little is known about the extent to which physicians discuss FP with patients. This qualitative study sought to identify current physician FP communication practices and determine factors that may impact communication efforts regarding FP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using semi structured interviews with 16 physicians practicing at a major cancer center in the South. RESULTS: All providers were board certified in medical oncology, radiation oncology or surgical oncology. The main factors that emerged from qualitative analysis included distinct variations in quality of discussion about FP, knowledge of FP resources, attitudes, practice behaviors and perceptions of patient characteristics. DISCUSSION: While most physicians discussed potential fertility loss as a side effect of cancer treatment, few provided information to patients about preserving fertility. Patient characteristics such as gender and cancer site may impact the discussion, as well as system factors such as costs of procedures and access to FP resources. Education and training for physicians about FP options for cancer patients, particularly females, may promote discussion of FP. In addition, system barriers related to availability and affordability of FP resources must also be addressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Physicians should consider providing patients with timely, understandable information related to their FP options, prior to the administration of treatment. Such discussions may lead to improved quality of life for individuals as they transition from patients to survivors.
INTRODUCTION: Although physician discussion with patients regarding fertility preservation (FP) options prior to cancer treatment can provide important information for survivors concerning their future fertility, little is known about the extent to which physicians discuss FP with patients. This qualitative study sought to identify current physician FP communication practices and determine factors that may impact communication efforts regarding FP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using semi structured interviews with 16 physicians practicing at a major cancer center in the South. RESULTS: All providers were board certified in medical oncology, radiation oncology or surgical oncology. The main factors that emerged from qualitative analysis included distinct variations in quality of discussion about FP, knowledge of FP resources, attitudes, practice behaviors and perceptions of patient characteristics. DISCUSSION: While most physicians discussed potential fertility loss as a side effect of cancer treatment, few provided information to patients about preserving fertility. Patient characteristics such as gender and cancer site may impact the discussion, as well as system factors such as costs of procedures and access to FP resources. Education and training for physicians about FP options for cancer patients, particularly females, may promote discussion of FP. In addition, system barriers related to availability and affordability of FP resources must also be addressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Physicians should consider providing patients with timely, understandable information related to their FP options, prior to the administration of treatment. Such discussions may lead to improved quality of life for individuals as they transition from patients to survivors.
Authors: Tress Goodwin; B Elizabeth Oosterhuis; Michaela Kiernan; Melissa M Hudson; Gary V Dahl Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Stephanie J Lee; Leslie R Schover; Ann H Partridge; Pasquale Patrizio; W Hamish Wallace; Karen Hagerty; Lindsay N Beck; Lawrence V Brennan; Kutluk Oktay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giselle K Perez; John M Salsman; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Elyse R Park; Abby R Rosenberg Journal: Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Date: 2020-03
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Teri Malo; Joyce Reinecke; Bethanne Bower; Terrance Albrecht; Marla L Clayman Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jeremy Lewin; Justin Ming Zheng Ma; Laura Mitchell; Seline Tam; Natasha Puri; Derek Stephens; Amirrtha Srikanthan; Philippe Bedard; Albiruni Razak; Michael Crump; David Warr; Meredith Giuliani; Abha Gupta Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Katrina F Trivers; Aliza K Fink; Ann H Partridge; Kutluk Oktay; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Chunyu Li; Lori A Pollack Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Patricia E Hershberger; Lorna Finnegan; Susan Altfeld; Sara Lake; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron Journal: Res Theory Nurs Pract Date: 2013 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: John M Salsman; Betina Yanez; Kristin N Smith; Jennifer L Beaumont; Mallory A Snyder; Khouri Barnes; Marla L Clayman Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 11.908