PURPOSE: We evaluated four potential gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of myocardial perfusion in comparison with oxygen-15-labeled water ([15O]water) in healthy pigs. Four hexadentate salicylaldimine ligands derived from bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine (BAPEN) that showed promise in previous rat experiments were selected for this study. METHODS: Following an evaluation of myocardial blood flow with [15O]water PET, the pigs (total n=14) underwent a dynamic 90-min PET study with one of four 68Ga-labeled BAPEN derivatives (n=3-5 per tracer) either at rest or under adenosine stress. Serial arterial blood samples were collected during the imaging for the measurements of total radioactivity, radiometabolites, plasma protein binding and blood-to-plasma ratio for the 68Ga chelates. Time-activity curves of the left ventricular blood pool and myocardium were derived from PET images, and metabolite-corrected arterial input function was used for kinetic modeling. Also, ex vivo biodistribution of 68Ga radioactivity was analyzed. RESULTS: All four 68Ga tracers showed undesirably slow myocardial accumulation over time, but their in vivo stability, clearance from blood and the kinetics of the myocardium uptake varied. [68Ga][Ga-(sal)2BAPDMEN]1+ showed the highest myocardial uptake in PET images and tissue samples (myocardium-to-blood ratio 7.63±1.89, myocardium-to-lung ratio 3.03±0.33 and myocardium-to-liver ratio 1.80±0.82). However, there was no correlation between the myocardial perfusion measured with [15O]water and the net uptake rates or K1 values of the 68Ga chelates. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that myocardial accumulation of the 68Ga chelates proposed for myocardial perfusion imaging with PET was slow and not determined by myocardial perfusion in a large animal model. These findings suggest that the studied tracers are not suitable for clinical imaging of myocardial perfusion.
PURPOSE: We evaluated four potential gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of myocardial perfusion in comparison with oxygen-15-labeled water ([15O]water) in healthy pigs. Four hexadentate salicylaldimine ligands derived from bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine (BAPEN) that showed promise in previous rat experiments were selected for this study. METHODS: Following an evaluation of myocardial blood flow with [15O]water PET, the pigs (total n=14) underwent a dynamic 90-min PET study with one of four 68Ga-labeled BAPEN derivatives (n=3-5 per tracer) either at rest or under adenosine stress. Serial arterial blood samples were collected during the imaging for the measurements of total radioactivity, radiometabolites, plasma protein binding and blood-to-plasma ratio for the 68Ga chelates. Time-activity curves of the left ventricular blood pool and myocardium were derived from PET images, and metabolite-corrected arterial input function was used for kinetic modeling. Also, ex vivo biodistribution of 68Ga radioactivity was analyzed. RESULTS: All four 68Ga tracers showed undesirably slow myocardial accumulation over time, but their in vivo stability, clearance from blood and the kinetics of the myocardium uptake varied. [68Ga][Ga-(sal)2BAPDMEN]1+ showed the highest myocardial uptake in PET images and tissue samples (myocardium-to-blood ratio 7.63±1.89, myocardium-to-lung ratio 3.03±0.33 and myocardium-to-liver ratio 1.80±0.82). However, there was no correlation between the myocardial perfusion measured with [15O]water and the net uptake rates or K1 values of the 68Ga chelates. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that myocardial accumulation of the 68Ga chelates proposed for myocardial perfusion imaging with PET was slow and not determined by myocardial perfusion in a large animal model. These findings suggest that the studied tracers are not suitable for clinical imaging of myocardial perfusion.
Authors: Douglas S MacPherson; Kimberly Fung; Brendon E Cook; Lynn C Francesconi; Brian M Zeglis Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Izabela Tworowska; David Ranganathan; Sanjay Thamake; Ebrahim Delpassand; Alireza Mojtahedi; Michael K Schultz; Konstantin Zhernosekov; Sebastian Marx Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Vijay Sharma; Jothilingam Sivapackiam; Scott E Harpstrite; Julie L Prior; Hannah Gu; Nigam P Rath; David Piwnica-Worms Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria Grönman; Miikka Tarkia; Tuomas Kiviniemi; Paavo Halonen; Antti Kuivanen; Timo Savunen; Tuula Tolvanen; Jarmo Teuho; Meeri Käkelä; Olli Metsälä; Mikko Pietilä; Pekka Saukko; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Juhani Knuuti; Anne Roivainen; Antti Saraste Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 5.531