| Literature DB >> 28629432 |
Maria Grönman1, Miikka Tarkia1, Tuomas Kiviniemi2, Paavo Halonen3, Antti Kuivanen3, Timo Savunen2,4, Tuula Tolvanen5,6, Jarmo Teuho5,6, Meeri Käkelä1, Olli Metsälä1, Mikko Pietilä2, Pekka Saukko7, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala3, Juhani Knuuti1,5, Anne Roivainen1,5,8, Antti Saraste9,10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiolabeled RGD peptides detect αvβ3 integrin expression associated with angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodeling after myocardial infarction. We studied whether cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) with [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD detects increased αvβ3 integrin expression after induction of flow-limiting coronary stenosis in pigs, and whether αvβ3 integrin is expressed in viable ischemic or injured myocardium.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Myocardial ischemia; Positron emission tomography; αvβ3 integrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28629432 PMCID: PMC5477135 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1245-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Co-registration of [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD and [15O]water PET images and definition of myocardial contours. a and f demonstrate [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD images during the first 2 min after injection of the tracer, b and g demonstrate the fusion of [15O]water PET images (c, h) and [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD images used in the co-registration (a, f). Yellow lines represent myocardial contours defined in [15O]water PET images and copied to the [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD images. d and i demonstrate the fusion of the [15O]water PET images (c, h) and [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD images during the last 20 min of the imaging session (e, j) that demonstrate higher activity in the ischemic area in the anteroseptal wall as compared with the remote myocardium in the inferoposterior wall
Fig. 2Cardiac [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD and [15O]water in vivo PET analyses. a and b demonstrate polar maps of MBF measured by [15O]water PET at rest and during adenosine stress, respectively. c and d show polar maps of [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake. Note the presence of increased [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake in c co-localizing with an area of reduced myocardial perfusion (asterisk in a, b) as compared with the remote area (arrowhead in a, b). Distribution of [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD is homogenous in the left ventricle of sham operated pig (d)
Cardiac [15O]water and [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD PET
| Animal | [15O]water PET | [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD PET | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ischemic area (% of the LV) | Remote SUVMean | Ischemic area SUVMean | Injured area SUVMax | |
| 1 | 19 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.95 |
| 2 | 17 | 0.37 | 0.56 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 35 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 1.11 |
| 4 | 32 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 19 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 36 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.94 |
| 7 | 37 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 43 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Mean |
|
|
|
|
| SD |
|
|
|
|
The size of ischemic area based on [15O]water PET during adenosine stress and myocardial [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake shown as standardized uptake value (SUV) in the remote myocardium, in the ischemic area and at the site of the highest uptake (Max) within the ischemic area
SUV standardized uptake value, LV left ventricle
* p = 0.0034 vs. remote
†p < 0.001 vs. remote
Fig. 3Myocardial histology. Left panel representative image of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. The arrows show the areas where the tissue samples of the injured area, viable ischemic area and remote area were collected. a–o demonstrate stainings of hematoxylin-eosin (a–c) and Masson’s trichrome (d–f), and immunohistochemical stainings of CD31 (g–i), αvβ3 integrin (j–l) and α-smooth muscle actin (m–o), and autoradiography (p–r) from the remote myocardium, from the viable ischemic area or injured myocardium based on TTC staining. Scale bar 50 µm
Fig. 4Immunohistochemistry of endothelial cells and αvβ3 integrin. The graphs in a and b show areal percentages of myocardium stained with CD31 antibodies (endothelial cells) and αvβ3 integrin antibodies, respectively. Integrin αvβ3 staining correlates with the [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake measured by autoradiography in the viable ischemic area, in the injured area and in the remote area (c)
Fig. 5Kinetics [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD. Mean (n = 8) time-activity curves of average [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake in the remote myocardium, in the ischemic area and in the blood from the whole imaging session (a) and from the end part of the imaging session (b)
Fig. 6Quantification of [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake. The graphs in a show [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake measured in PET images in the remote myocardium and in the ischemic area. b Shows [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake measured with a gamma counter (ex vivo biodistribution) in myocardial tissue samples obtained from the remote myocardium and from the viable ischemic area or injured myocardium based on TTC staining. c Shows [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD uptake by autoradiography in myocardial tissue sections in the remote myocardium, viable ischemic area or injured myocardium. n number, SUV standardized uptake value