PURPOSE: SPECT (e.g., with (99m)Tc-sestamibi) is routinely used for imaging myocardial damage, even though PET could offer a higher spatial resolution. Using the generator-gained isotope (68)Ga would allow a rapid supply of the tracer in the diagnostic unit. For this reason, the aim of the study was to develop (68)Ga-labeled PET tracers based on different Schiff base amines and to evaluate the cardiomyocyte uptake in vitro as well as the biodistribution of the tracers in vivo. PROCEDURES: Fifteen different Schiff bases (basing on 3 different backbones) were synthesized and labeled with (68)Ga. Lipophilicity varied between 0.87 ± 0.24 and 2.72 ± 0.14 (logD value). All tracers were positively charged and stable in plasma and apo-transferrin solution. In vitro uptake into cardiomyocytes was assessed in HL-1 cells in the absence and presence of the ionophor valinomycin. In vivo accumulation in the heart and in various organs was assessed by small animal PET imaging as well as by ex vivo biodistribution. The results were compared with (99m)Tc-sestamibi and (18)F-flurpiridaz. RESULTS: All cationic Schiff bases were taken up into cardiomyocytes but the amount varied by a factor of 10. When destroying the membrane potential, the cellular uptake was markedly reduced in most of the tracers, indicating the applicability of these tracers for identifying ischemic myocardium. PET imaging revealed that the in vivo myocardial uptake reached a constant value approximately 10 min after injection but the intracardial amount of the tracer varied profoundly (SUV 0.46 to 3.35). The most suitable tracers showed a myocardial uptake which was comparable to that of (99m)Tc-sestamibi. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-based Schiff bases appear suitable for myocardial PET images with uptake comparable to (99m)Tc-sestamibi but offering higher spatial resolution. By systematical variation of the backbone and the side chains, tracers with optimal properties can be identified for further clinical evaluation.
PURPOSE: SPECT (e.g., with (99m)Tc-sestamibi) is routinely used for imaging myocardial damage, even though PET could offer a higher spatial resolution. Using the generator-gained isotope (68)Ga would allow a rapid supply of the tracer in the diagnostic unit. For this reason, the aim of the study was to develop (68)Ga-labeled PET tracers based on different Schiff base amines and to evaluate the cardiomyocyte uptake in vitro as well as the biodistribution of the tracers in vivo. PROCEDURES: Fifteen different Schiff bases (basing on 3 different backbones) were synthesized and labeled with (68)Ga. Lipophilicity varied between 0.87 ± 0.24 and 2.72 ± 0.14 (logD value). All tracers were positively charged and stable in plasma and apo-transferrin solution. In vitro uptake into cardiomyocytes was assessed in HL-1 cells in the absence and presence of the ionophor valinomycin. In vivo accumulation in the heart and in various organs was assessed by small animal PET imaging as well as by ex vivo biodistribution. The results were compared with (99m)Tc-sestamibi and (18)F-flurpiridaz. RESULTS: All cationic Schiff bases were taken up into cardiomyocytes but the amount varied by a factor of 10. When destroying the membrane potential, the cellular uptake was markedly reduced in most of the tracers, indicating the applicability of these tracers for identifying ischemic myocardium. PET imaging revealed that the in vivo myocardial uptake reached a constant value approximately 10 min after injection but the intracardial amount of the tracer varied profoundly (SUV 0.46 to 3.35). The most suitable tracers showed a myocardial uptake which was comparable to that of (99m)Tc-sestamibi. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-based Schiff bases appear suitable for myocardial PET images with uptake comparable to (99m)Tc-sestamibi but offering higher spatial resolution. By systematical variation of the backbone and the side chains, tracers with optimal properties can be identified for further clinical evaluation.
Authors: Miikka Tarkia; Antti Saraste; Tiina Saanijoki; Vesa Oikonen; Tommi Vähäsilta; Marjatta Strandberg; Christoffer Stark; Tuula Tolvanen; Mika Teräs; Timo Savunen; Mark A Green; Juhani Knuuti; Anne Roivainen Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Padmaja Yalamanchili; Eric Wexler; Megan Hayes; Ming Yu; Jody Bozek; Mikhail Kagan; Heike S Radeke; Michael Azure; Ajay Purohit; David S Casebier; Simon P Robinson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 5.952