Literature DB >> 22264739

Towards optimizing perioperative colorectal care: outcomes for 1,000 consecutive laparoscopic colon procedures using enhanced recovery pathways.

Conor P Delaney1, Karen Brady, Donya Woconish, Stavan P Parmar, Bradley J Champagne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Learning curves and efficiency concerns have slowed the integration of laparoscopy into colorectal practice. We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic colorectal (LC) surgery using enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs).
METHODS: One thousand consecutive LC procedures performed by 2 surgeons over a 5-year period using previously published, standardized ERPs were assessed.
RESULTS: The mean age was 59, and the mean body mass index was 29.5. Procedures included segmental colectomy (54%), proctectomy (19%), total colectomy (11%), ostomy (5%), and other procedures (11%). Diagnoses included malignancy (41%), diverticulitis (16%), inflammatory bowel disease (13%), and other (30%). The mean operative time was 151 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 55 mL. Conversion to an open surgery occurred in 5.8%, whereas 2.3% were performed using a hand-assist procedure. The mean hospital stay was 4.1 days (median 3), with a 6% readmission rate. Complications (20%) included mortality (0.3%), wound infection (4%), and anastomotic leak (1.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: LC surgery with ERP offers excellent outcomes with efficient use of resources.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264739     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  30 in total

Review 1.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Anthony J Senagore; Justin K Lawrence; Brad J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predicting who will fail early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an established enhanced recovery pathway.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Blake Bankwitz; Donya Woconish; Bradley J Champagne; Harry L Reynolds; Sharon L Stein; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Chen; Z Zou; F Chen; Z Huang; G Li
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Health Care Policy and Outcomes after Colon and Rectal Surgery: What Is the Bigger Picture?-Cost Containment, Incentivizing Value, Transparency, and Centers of Excellence.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Stefan D Holubar; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

8.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  ERAS protocol validation in a propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Aaron C Spaulding; James M Naessens; Zhuo Li; Amit Merchea; Julia E Crook; David W Larson; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Sadaf Khan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.