Literature DB >> 22264454

Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program.

Kunj R Sheth1, Vidit Sharma, Brian T Helfand, John Cashy, Kristin Smith, Jason C Hedges, Tobias S Köhler, Teresa K Woodruff, Robert E Brannigan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Survival to reproductive age among men with cancer has steadily increased and yet cancer therapy and cancer itself may carry the risk of infertility. Since 2006, we have used a formalized fertility preservation program with expedited fertility care at our institution. We assessed the impact of this program by comparing the frequency of sperm cryopreservation and patient characteristics before and after its implementation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 18 to 55 years old diagnosed with cancer at our institution from 2002 to 2010 were included in our study. We retrospectively reviewed patient charts to identify those who were offered and subsequently used fertility preservation services before and after program formalization.
RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010 at our institution 4,818 men 18 to 55 years old were diagnosed with cancer, of whom 411 were offered fertility preservation consultation and 249 underwent sperm cryopreservation. Since program implementation, the annual number of men receiving fertility preservation consultation and undergoing sperm cryopreservation increased by 2.4 and 2.7-fold, respectively, while the total number diagnosed with cancer remained fairly constant. Upon substratifying patients into the more conventional reproductive age range of 18 to 40 years 23.4% of all men with cancer in this group were offered consultation before formalization vs 43.3% after formalization (p <0.05). The overall sperm use and discard rates were 8.4% and 14.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A formalized institutional fertility preservation program significantly increased the overall number and percent of male patients with cancer who received fertility preservation consultation and pursued sperm cryopreservation. These increases were seen in men with all types of cancer and across all demographics assessed at our institution.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264454     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  Fertility Preservation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Adolescents', Parents', and Providers' Perspectives, Experiences, and Preferences.

Authors:  Julia F Taylor; Mary A Ott
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 2.  Male Fertility Preservation.

Authors:  J Abram McBride; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Do Patient Characteristics Decide if Young Adult Cancer Patients Undergo Fertility Preservation?

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Nicholas D Yeager; Sarah H O'Brien; Stacy Whiteside; Anthony Audino; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium.

Authors:  Molly B Moravek; Leslie C Appiah; Antoinette Anazodo; Karen C Burns; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Holly R Hoefgen; Olivia Jaworek Frias; Monica M Laronda; Jennifer Levine; Lillian R Meacham; Mary Ellen Pavone; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Erin E Rowell; Andrew C Strine; Teresa K Woodruff; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 6.  Fertility considerations in men with testicular cancer.

Authors:  Neel V Parekh; Scott D Lundy; Sarah C Vij
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

7.  Oncofertility in Canada: an overview of Canadian practice and suggested action plan.

Authors:  R Ronn; H E G Holzer
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  A Review of the Oncology Patient's Challenges for Utilizing Fertility Preservation Services.

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Oncofertility program implementation increases access to fertility preservation options and assisted reproductive procedures for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Natalia C Llarena; Samantha L Estevez; Molly B Moravek; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Future Directions in Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation: A Report from the 2011 Oncofertility Consortium Conference.

Authors:  Kate E Waimey; Francesca E Duncan; H Irene Su; Kristin Smith; Harlan Wallach; Kemi Jona; Christos Coutifaris; Clarisa R Gracia; Lonnie D Shea; Robert E Brannigan; R Jeffrey Chang; Mary B Zelinski; Richard L Stouffer; Robert L Taylor; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.