Literature DB >> 22259690

Efficacy of decompression and fixation for metastatic spinal cord compression: analysis of factors prognostic for survival and postoperative ambulation.

Jin Hoon Park1, Seung Chul Rhim, Sang Ryong Jeon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of surgical intervention for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are prolonging survival and improving quality of life. Non-ambulatory paraplegic patients, either at presentation or after treatment, have a much shorter life expectancy than ambulatory patients. We therefore analyzed prognostic factors for survival and postoperative ambulation in patients surgically treated for MSCC.
METHODS: We assessed 103 patients with surgically treated MSCC who presented with lower extremity weakness between January 2001 and December 2008. Factors prognostic for overall survival (OS) and postoperative ambulation, including surgical method, age, sex, primary tumor site, metastatic spinal site, surgical levels, Tokuhashi score, and treatment with chemo- or radiation therapy, were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Median OS was significantly longer in the postoperatively ambulatory group [11.0 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 9.29-12.71 months] than in the non-ambulatory group (5.0 months; 95% CI, 1.80-8.20 months) (p=0.035). When we compared median OS in patients with high (9-11) and low (0-8) Tokuhashi scores, they were significantly longer in the former (15.0 months; 95% CI, 9.29-20.71 months vs. 9.0 months; 95% CI, 7.48-10.52 months; p=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative ambulation with or without aid [odds ratio (OR) 5.35; 95% CI 1.57-18.17; p=0.007] and hip flexion power greater than grade III (OR 6.23; 95% CI, 1.29-7.35; p=0.038) were prognostic of postoperative ambulation.
CONCLUSION: We found that postoperative ambulation and preoperative high Tokuhashi score were significantly associated with longer patient survival. In addition, preoperative hip flexion power greater than grade III was critical for postoperative ambulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulation; Cord compression; Hip flexion; Prognostic factor; Spinal metastasis; Survival

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259690      PMCID: PMC3259463          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.5.434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  25 in total

1.  Matched pair analysis comparing surgery followed by radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Stefan Huttenlocher; Juergen Dunst; Amira Bajrovic; Johann H Karstens; Volker Rudat; Steven E Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Authors:  David Choi; A Crockard; C Bunger; J Harms; N Kawahara; C Mazel; R Melcher; K Tomita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Outcome following decompressive surgery for different histological types of metastatic tumors causing epidural spinal cord compression. Clinical article.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Courtney Pendleton; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-07

4.  A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Hiroshi Oda; Masashi Oshima; Junnosuke Ryu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  B Weigel; M Maghsudi; C Neumann; R Kretschmer; F J Müller; M Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Tokuhashi prognosis score: an important tool in prediction of the neurological outcome in metastatic spinal cord compression: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Cornelia Putz; Bernd Wiedenhöfer; Hans Jürgen Gerner; Carl Hans Fürstenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Changes in physical function after palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor: association of the revised Tokuhashi score with neurologic recovery.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamashita; Yoichi Aota; Kazuyoshi Kushida; Hitoshi Murayama; Toru Hiruma; Masanobu Takeyama; Yuichi Iwamura; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinical outcome and survival after palliative surgery for spinal metastases: palliative surgery in spinal metastases.

Authors:  Hiroki Hirabayashi; Sohei Ebara; Tetsuya Kinoshita; Yohei Yuzawa; Isao Nakamura; Jun Takahashi; Mikio Kamimura; Kuniyoshi Ohtsuka; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Outcome of treatment for spinal metastases using scoring system for preoperative evaluation of prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Yasumitsu Ajiro; Natsuki Umezawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  A systematic review of prognostic factors predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; W C H Jacobs; Y M Van der Linden; O Van der Hel; W Taal; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Which one is a valuable surrogate for predicting survival between Tomita and Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases? A meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy and individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Ki-jeong Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Sang Ryong Jeon; Ung-Kyu Chang; Sun-Ho Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Haroon Majeed; Dan Zhang; Gwenaelle Gravis; Christine Wibmer; Naresh Kumar; Kyung Yun Moon; Jin Hoon Park; Emeline Tabouret; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Preoperative prediction for regaining ambulatory ability in paretic non-ambulatory patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  M Ohashi; T Hirano; K Watanabe; K Katsumi; H Shoji; A Sano; H Tashi; I Takahashi; M Wakasugi; Y Shibuya; N Endo
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Søren Schmidt Morgen; Dennis Hallager Nielsen; Claus Falck Larsen; Rikke Søgaard; Svend Aage Engelholm; Benny Dahl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Surgical intervention for vertebral metastases may benefit lung cancer patients no less than other patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takashi Kobayashi; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Toshiki Abe; Eiji Abe; Kazuma Kikuchi; Yoichi Shimada; Seiko Matsumoto; Shin Fukui
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-04

6.  Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) treated with palliative decompression: Surgical timing and survival rate.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lo; Shu-Hua Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.

Authors:  Anick Nater; Allan R Martin; Arjun Sahgal; David Choi; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comprehensive surgical treatment strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Arthur Wagner; Elena Haag; Ann-Kathrin Joerger; Philipp Jost; Stephanie E Combs; Maria Wostrack; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Prognostic Factors for Bone Survival and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer Spine Metastases.

Authors:  Rui-Qi Qiao; Hao-Ran Zhang; Rong-Xing Ma; Rui-Feng Li; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

10.  Analysis of the predictive role and new proposal for surgical strategies based on the modified Tomita and Tokuhashi scoring systems for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Se-Jun Park; Sung-Soo Chung; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh; Chong-Suh Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.