Literature DB >> 19569942

Outcome following decompressive surgery for different histological types of metastatic tumors causing epidural spinal cord compression. Clinical article.

Kaisorn L Chaichana1, Courtney Pendleton, Daniel M Sciubba, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L Gokaslan.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a relatively common and debilitating complication of metastatic disease that often results in neurological deficits. Recent studies have supported decompressive surgery over radiation therapy for patients who present with MESCC. These studies, however, have grouped all patients with different histological types of metastatic disease into the same study population. The differential outcomes for patients with different histological types of metastatic disease therefore remain unknown.
METHODS: An institutional database of patients undergoing decompressive surgery for MESCC at an academic tertiary-care institution between 1996 and 2006 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with primary lung, breast, prostate, kidney, or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer or melanoma were identified. Fisher exact and log-rank analyses were used to compare pre-, peri-, and postoperative variables and survival for patients with these different types of primary cancers.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with primary lung cancer, 26 with breast cancer, 20 with prostate cancer, 21 with kidney cancer, 13 with GI cancer, and 7 with melanoma were identified and categorized. All of these patients were followed up for a mean +/- SD of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months following surgery. Patients with primary lung and prostate cancers were typically older than patients with other types of primary cancers. Patients with prostate cancer had the shortest duration of symptoms and more commonly presented with motor deficits, while patients with breast cancer more commonly had cervical spine involvement and compression fractures. For all histological types, > 90% of patients retained the ability to ambulate following surgery. However, the group with the highest percentage of patients who regained ambulatory function after decompressive surgery was the lung cancer group. Patients with breast or kidney cancer and those with melanoma had the highest median duration of survival following decompressive surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies differences in presenting symptoms, operative course, perioperative complications, long-term ambulatory outcomes, and duration of survival for patients with lung, breast, prostate, kidney, and GI cancers and melanoma. This understanding may allow better risk stratification for patients with MESCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569942     DOI: 10.3171/2009.1.SPINE08657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of unplanned hospital readmissions up to 2-years after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Andrew Thomas; Sirisha Madhu; Miguel Rafael David Ramos; Liang Shen; Joel Yong Hao Tan; Andre Villanueva; Nivetha Ravikumar; Gabriel Liu; Hee Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease in patients with spinal cord compression (MSCC) from relatively radioresistant tumors.

Authors:  Katja Freundt; Thekla Meyners; Amira Bajrovic; Hiba Basic; Johann H Karstens; Irenaeus A Adamietz; Volker Rudat; Steven E Schild; Juergen Dunst; Dirk Rades
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer metastatic to the spine.

Authors:  Derek G Ju; Alp Yurter; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  Trends in survival after surgery for breast cancer metastatic to the brain and spinal column in medicare patients: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Kevin S Cahill; John H Chi; Art L Day; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Eduardo Santamaria Carvalhal Ribas; David Schiff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Surgical Decompression of High-Grade Spinal Cord Compression from Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Omar Chohan; Sweena Kahn; Gustav Cederquist; Anne S Reiner; Joseph Schwab; Ilya Laufer; Mark Bilsky
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Gustavo Telles da Silva; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Vertebral stability in management of spinal metastases. Criteria and strategies for operative interventions].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Möhlenbruch; S Hemmer; B Lehner; K Klöckner; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Is surgery for spine metastasis reasonable in patients older than 60 years?

Authors:  Tangzhao Liang; Yong Wan; Xuenong Zou; Xinsheng Peng; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metastatic spinal cord compression as a result of the unknown primary tumour.

Authors:  N A Quraishi; D Ramoutar; D Sureshkumar; S R Manoharan; A Spencer; G Arealis; K L Edwards; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.