Literature DB >> 22259426

6-Chloro-1-methyl-indoline-2,3-dione.

Hua Quan Liu1, Wei Tang, De Cai Wang, Ping Kai Ou-Yang.   

Abstract

The title mol-ecule, C(9)H(6)ClNO(2), is essentially planar: the maximum deviation from the mean plane of the indoline ring is 0.020 (2) Å and the substituents do not deviate by more than 0.053 (2) Å from this plane. C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds help to consolidate the crystal structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259426      PMCID: PMC3254355          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

The title compound is a halogenated derivative of isatin. For the cytotoxic and anti­neoplastic activity of halogenated isatin deriv­atives, see: Vine et al. (2007 ▶); Matesic et al. (2008 ▶). For the preparation of the title compound, see: Bouhfid et al. (2005 ▶). For a related structure, see: Wu et al. (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H6ClNO2 M = 195.60 Monoclinic, a = 13.077 (3) Å b = 7.9390 (16) Å c = 16.673 (3) Å β = 101.95 (3)° V = 1693.5 (6) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.41 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.887, T max = 0.960 3124 measured reflections 1557 independent reflections 1250 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.118 S = 1.00 1557 reflections 119 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051294/pv2487sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051294/pv2487Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811051294/pv2487Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H6ClNO2F(000) = 800
Mr = 195.60Dx = 1.534 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 13.077 (3) Åθ = 9–13°
b = 7.9390 (16) ŵ = 0.41 mm1
c = 16.673 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 101.95 (3)°Block, yellow
V = 1693.5 (6) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 8
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1250 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.031
graphiteθmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.5°
ω/2θ scansh = 0→15
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.887, Tmax = 0.960l = −20→20
3124 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1557 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.118H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.080P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1557 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
119 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl0.44670 (4)0.16058 (8)0.34958 (3)0.0700 (3)
N0.64277 (11)0.39456 (19)0.62790 (9)0.0490 (4)
C10.62506 (13)0.3717 (2)0.54308 (11)0.0427 (4)
O10.84333 (11)0.63253 (19)0.57603 (13)0.0790 (5)
C20.54622 (13)0.2784 (2)0.49497 (11)0.0441 (4)
H2A0.49610.22250.51720.053*
O20.76431 (12)0.5344 (2)0.72436 (10)0.0801 (5)
C30.54593 (14)0.2728 (2)0.41247 (12)0.0492 (5)
C40.62028 (16)0.3525 (2)0.37645 (13)0.0552 (5)
H4A0.61800.34240.32050.066*
C50.69747 (15)0.4469 (2)0.42582 (13)0.0554 (5)
H5A0.74720.50330.40330.067*
C60.69983 (13)0.4564 (2)0.50844 (12)0.0484 (5)
C70.76899 (14)0.5415 (2)0.57711 (15)0.0579 (5)
C80.72891 (14)0.4939 (2)0.65333 (14)0.0579 (5)
C90.58013 (17)0.3220 (3)0.68150 (14)0.0608 (5)
H9A0.60960.35210.73730.091*
H9B0.57940.20160.67610.091*
H9C0.51000.36430.66660.091*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl0.0696 (4)0.0753 (4)0.0577 (4)−0.0114 (3)−0.0042 (3)−0.0050 (2)
N0.0434 (9)0.0508 (9)0.0522 (9)−0.0023 (7)0.0088 (7)−0.0046 (7)
C10.0372 (9)0.0385 (8)0.0526 (10)0.0041 (7)0.0095 (7)0.0015 (7)
O10.0522 (9)0.0643 (9)0.1197 (15)−0.0190 (8)0.0158 (9)−0.0066 (9)
C20.0394 (9)0.0423 (9)0.0509 (10)−0.0021 (7)0.0100 (7)0.0035 (7)
O20.0701 (10)0.0856 (11)0.0755 (12)−0.0061 (8)−0.0060 (8)−0.0214 (9)
C30.0455 (10)0.0446 (10)0.0544 (11)0.0033 (8)0.0031 (8)0.0022 (8)
C40.0631 (12)0.0558 (12)0.0481 (11)0.0060 (9)0.0143 (9)0.0089 (8)
C50.0535 (11)0.0511 (11)0.0673 (13)0.0018 (9)0.0253 (9)0.0131 (9)
C60.0384 (9)0.0385 (9)0.0690 (13)0.0007 (7)0.0126 (8)0.0029 (8)
C70.0377 (10)0.0444 (10)0.0900 (16)−0.0023 (8)0.0098 (9)−0.0042 (9)
C80.0433 (10)0.0534 (11)0.0715 (14)0.0020 (8)−0.0009 (9)−0.0132 (9)
C90.0596 (12)0.0710 (14)0.0530 (12)0.0004 (10)0.0141 (9)0.0037 (10)
Cl—C31.7361 (19)C3—C41.396 (3)
N—C81.369 (2)C4—C51.383 (3)
N—C11.397 (2)C4—H4A0.9300
N—C91.451 (3)C5—C61.373 (3)
C1—C21.383 (2)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—C61.406 (2)C6—C71.468 (3)
O1—C71.215 (2)C7—C81.519 (3)
C2—C31.376 (3)C9—H9A0.9600
C2—H2A0.9300C9—H9B0.9600
O2—C81.222 (3)C9—H9C0.9600
C8—N—C1109.98 (16)C4—C5—H5A120.4
C8—N—C9124.86 (18)C5—C6—C1120.85 (18)
C1—N—C9125.16 (15)C5—C6—C7133.59 (17)
C2—C1—N127.17 (16)C1—C6—C7105.55 (17)
C2—C1—C6121.09 (17)O1—C7—C6128.9 (2)
N—C1—C6111.74 (16)O1—C7—C8125.2 (2)
C3—C2—C1116.40 (16)C6—C7—C8105.93 (16)
C3—C2—H2A121.8O2—C8—N125.0 (2)
C1—C2—H2A121.8O2—C8—C7128.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4123.89 (18)N—C8—C7106.77 (17)
C2—C3—Cl117.88 (14)N—C9—H9A109.5
C4—C3—Cl118.23 (15)N—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—C3118.50 (19)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—H4A120.8N—C9—H9C109.5
C3—C4—H4A120.8H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C5—C4119.24 (17)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C5—H5A120.4
C8—N—C1—C2179.45 (16)C2—C1—C6—C7179.49 (15)
C9—N—C1—C20.2 (3)N—C1—C6—C7−0.97 (19)
C8—N—C1—C60.0 (2)C5—C6—C7—O12.2 (4)
C9—N—C1—C6−179.27 (17)C1—C6—C7—O1−178.19 (19)
N—C1—C2—C3−179.06 (16)C5—C6—C7—C8−178.04 (19)
C6—C1—C2—C30.4 (2)C1—C6—C7—C81.52 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C41.0 (3)C1—N—C8—O2−179.21 (19)
C1—C2—C3—Cl−178.72 (13)C9—N—C8—O20.0 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.9 (3)C1—N—C8—C71.0 (2)
Cl—C3—C4—C5177.82 (14)C9—N—C8—C7−179.76 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C61.3 (3)O1—C7—C8—O2−1.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C10.0 (3)C6—C7—C8—O2178.7 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7179.48 (19)O1—C7—C8—N178.14 (18)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.9 (3)C6—C7—C8—N−1.6 (2)
N—C1—C6—C5178.65 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2A···O1i0.932.503.419 (2)168
C9—H9A···O20.962.532.906 (3)103
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C2—H2A⋯O1i0.932.503.419 (2)168

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of some substituted isatin derivatives.

Authors:  Kara L Vine; Julie M Locke; Marie Ranson; Kirsten Benkendorff; Stephen G Pyne; John B Bremner
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  N-phenethyl and N-naphthylmethyl isatins and analogues as in vitro cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Lidia Matesic; Julie M Locke; John B Bremner; Stephen G Pyne; Danielle Skropeta; Marie Ranson; Kara L Vine
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  5-Chloro-1-(4-meth-oxy-benz-yl)indoline-2,3-dione.

Authors:  Weiyao Wu; Tingting Zheng; Shengli Cao; Zhichang Xiao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-01-08

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.