Literature DB >> 25318371

A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies.

Imad Ismail1, Sandrine Wolff, Agnes Gronfier, Didier Mutter, Lee L Swanström, Lee L Swantröm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create and validate a micro-costing methodology that surgeons and hospital administrators can use to evaluate the cost of implementing innovative surgical technologies.
METHODS: Our analysis is broken down into several elements of fixed and variable costs which are used to effectively and easily calculate the cost of surgical operations. As an example of application, we use data from 86 robot assisted gastric bypass operations made in our hospital. To validate our methodology, we discuss the cost reporting approaches used in 16 surgical publications with respect to 7 predefined criteria.
RESULTS: Four formulas are created which allow users to import data from their health system or particular situation and derive the total cost. We have established that the robotic surgical system represents 97.53 % of our operating room's medical device costs which amounts to $4320.11. With a mean surgery time of 303 min, personnel cost per operation amounts to $1244.73, whereas reusable instruments and disposable costs are, respectively, $1539.69 and $3629.55 per case. The literature survey demonstrates that the cost of surgery is rarely reported or emphasized, and authors who do cover this concept do so with variable methodologies which make their findings difficult to interpret.
CONCLUSION: Using a micro-costing methodology, it is possible to identify the cost of any new surgical procedure/technology using formulas that can be adapted to a variety of operations and healthcare systems. We hope that this paper will provide guidance for decision makers and a means for surgeons to harmonise cost reporting in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25318371     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3929-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

1.  The Leipzig experience with robotic valve surgery.

Authors:  R Autschbach; J F Onnasch; V Falk; T Walther; M Krüger; L O Schilling; F W Mohr
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. 1963.

Authors:  Kenneth J Arrow
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Robotic fundoplication: from theoretic advantages to real problems.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Jacques Himpens; Jean Bruyns; Guy Bernard Cadière
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?

Authors:  Chan W Park; Edward C F Lam; Teresa M Walsh; Maxine Karimoto; Adrienne T Ma; Matthew Koo; Chet Hammill; Kenric Murayama; Cedric S F Lorenzo; Racquel Bueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].

Authors:  T Dennis; C de Mendonça; J Phalippou; P Collinet; L Boulanger; F Weingertner; E Leblanc; F Narducci
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2012-01-16

9.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures?

Authors:  Peter van Dam; Jan Hauspy; Luc Verkinderen; Xuan Bich Trinh; Pieter-Jan van Dam; Luc Van Looy; Luc Dirix
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-09-18
View more
  13 in total

1.  Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?

Authors:  S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.

Authors:  Walaa F Abdelmoaty; Christy M Dunst; Chris Neighorn; Lee L Swanstrom; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Should total thyroidectomies be performed by high-volume endocrine surgeons? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Anagnostis; Ioannis Pliakos; Stavros Panidis; Angeliki Chorti; Veronika Stelmach; Antonios Michalopoulos; Theodosios S Papavramidis
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Point-of-care diagnostics for niche applications.

Authors:  Brian M Cummins; Frances S Ligler; Glenn M Walker
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 14.227

6.  Multi-Centre Micro-Costing of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy and Adjustable Gastric Banding Procedures for the Treatment of Severe, Complex Obesity.

Authors:  Brett Doble; Richard Welbourn; Nicholas Carter; James Byrne; Chris A Rogers; Jane M Blazeby; Sarah Wordsworth
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  A micro-costing evaluation of lobectomy by thoracotomy versus thoracoscopy.

Authors:  Maud Charvin; Hans Martin Späth; Alain Bernard; Anne-Claire Bertaux
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  What Are the Real Procedural Costs of Bariatric Surgery? A Systematic Literature Review of Published Cost Analyses.

Authors:  Brett Doble; Sarah Wordsworth; Chris A Rogers; Richard Welbourn; James Byrne; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  A feasibility study investigating the acceptability and design of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's contractures of the fingers (HAND-1): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleanor Harrison; Wei Tan; Nicola Mills; Alexia Karantana; Kirsty Sprange; Lelia Duley; Daisy Elliott; Jane Blazeby; William Hollingworth; Alan A Montgomery; Tim Davis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Procedure costs associated with the use of Harmonic devices compared to conventional techniques in various surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Rana A Qadeer; Nicole Ferko; Behnam Sadeghirad; Chris G Cameron; Joseph F Amaral
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.