Literature DB >> 22251462

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute leads to sufficient bone tissue formation already after 3 months: histological and histomorphometrical analysis 3 and 6 months following human sinus cavity augmentation.

Shahram Ghanaati1, Mike Barbeck, Ines Willershausen, Benjamin Thimm, Stefan Stuebinger, Tadas Korzinskas, Karina Obreja, Constantin Landes, Charles J Kirkpatrick, Robert A Sader.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study the de novo bone formation capacity of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute was assessed 3 and 6 months after its insertion into the human sinus cavity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sinus cavity augmentation was performed in a total of 14 patients (n = 7 implantation after 3 months; n = 7 implantation after 6 months) with severely atrophic maxillary bone. The specimens obtained after 3 and 6 months were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically with special focus on bone metabolism within the residual bone and the augmented region.
RESULTS: This study revealed that bone tissue formation started from the bone-biomaterial-interface and was directed into the most cranial parts of the augmented region. There was no statistically significant difference in new bone formation after 3 and 6 months (24.89 ± 10.22% vs 31.29 ± 2.29%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study and according to previously published data, implant insertion in regions augmented with this bone substitute material could be considered already after 3 months. Further clinical studies with bone substitute materials are necessary to validate these findings.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NanoBone; nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite; sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22251462     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00433.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  12 in total

1.  Development of a novel histological and histomorphometric evaluation protocol for a standardized description of the mid-palatal suture - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ines Willershausen; Christina Erbe; Sarah Al-Maawi; Anna Orlowska; Heiner Wehrbein; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data.

Authors:  Eleni Kapogianni; Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Daniel Rothamel; Ole Jung; Aylin Arslan; Lennart Kuhnel; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Reinhard E. Friedrich; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Allogeneic bone block for challenging augmentation-a clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical investigation of tissue reaction and new bone formation.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Alica Kubesch; Sarah Al-Maawi; Frank Schwarz; Robert A Sader; Markus Schlee; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Potential applications and human biosafety of nanomaterials used in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Hong Su; Yafei Wang; Yuanliang Gu; Linda Bowman; Jinshun Zhao; Min Ding
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Comparison of the Validity of Enzymatic and Immunohistochemical Detection of Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) in the Context of Biocompatibility Analyses of Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Anne-Kathrin Jung; Ole Jung; Said Alkildani; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Novel osteoconductive β-tricalcium phosphate/poly(L-lactide-co-e-caprolactone) scaffold for bone regeneration: a study in a rabbit calvarial defect.

Authors:  Hanna Pihlman; Pauli Keränen; Kaarlo Paakinaho; Jere Linden; Markus Hannula; Iida-Kaisa Manninen; Jari Hyttinen; Mikko Manninen; Outi Laitinen-Vapaavuori
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Synthetic bone substitute material comparable with xenogeneic material for bone tissue regeneration in oral cancer patients: First and preliminary histological, histomorphometrical and clinical results.

Authors:  Shahram Ghanaati; Mike Barbeck; Jonas Lorenz; Stefan Stuebinger; Oliver Seitz; Constantin Landes; Adorján F Kovács; Charles J Kirkpatrick; Robert A Sader
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07

8.  High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Cultured Autogenous Periosteal Cells in Sinus Lift Bone Grafting.

Authors:  Shin Ogawa; Hideyuki Hoshina; Koh Nakata; Kazuho Yamada; Kohya Uematsu; Tomoyuki Kawase; Ritsuo Takagi; Masaki Nagata
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Volumetric analysis of bone substitute material performance within the human sinus cavity of former head and neck cancer patients: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Kathrin Eichler; Mike Barbeck; Henriette Lerner; Stefan Stübinger; Catherine Seipel; Thomas J Vogl; Adorján F Kovács; Shahram Ghanaati; Robert A Sader
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

10.  Implantation of silicon dioxide-based nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and pure phase beta-tricalciumphosphate bone substitute granules in caprine muscle tissue does not induce new bone formation.

Authors:  Shahram Ghanaati; Samuel E Udeabor; Mike Barbeck; Ines Willershausen; Oliver Kuenzel; Robert A Sader; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.